Lithuania - A LygaVilniaus LFF stadionasData current as of 07 September 2026

Žalgiris vs TransINVEST Vilnius: match statistics

Žalgiris vs TransINVEST Vilnius: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Žalgiris played TransINVEST Vilnius in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 19 July 2026. Venue: Vilniaus LFF stadionas. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Žalgiris: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. TransINVEST Vilnius: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Žalgiris scores 1.43 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.71 and concedes 1.19. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Žalgiris 43%, TransINVEST Vilnius 62%. Over 2.5: Žalgiris 57%, TransINVEST Vilnius 71%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Žalgiris has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.43. Žalgiris: 14.2 shots per match, TransINVEST Vilnius: 12.4.

Match halves

Žalgiris: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.71. TransINVEST Vilnius: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

Žalgiris: 31-45+ (8 goals). TransINVEST Vilnius: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Žalgiris has the advantage in form and game control: in the last 5 matches the home side won 3, drew 1 and lost 1, averaging 2 points per game, while TransINVEST in their last five have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, averaging 1 point per game. At home Žalgiris holds 58% possession, has average xG of 1.55 and scores 1.9 goals per game with 13.7 shots and 4.4 shots on target on average. TransINVEST away averages 12.36 shots, 4.91 on target and a higher shot conversion rate of 17% (versus Žalgiris’ 14%), translating to 2.09 goals per game. Defensively the visitors are slightly more compact on the road (1.27 conceded and xG against 1.25) than Žalgiris at home (1.6 conceded and xG against 1.41), and the overall goals average is 3.5 for the hosts and 3.36 for the visitors, which points to an open game. Considering Žalgiris’ superior form and control but also TransINVEST’s shooting efficiency, I tip a home win; I assess the probabilities as 50% for Žalgiris, 25% for a draw and 25% for TransINVEST.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show high season BTTS rates: Žalgiris 60% and TransINVEST 64%, both above the league average 49%, which increases the likelihood of both sides scoring. TransINVEST is more productive offensively — averaging 2.09 goals per match vs 1.3 for Žalgiris — and also has higher shot conversion (17% vs 10%) and more shots on target (4.91 vs 3.4), boosting the probability of their goal. Bilateral xG are very close (1.42 for Žalgiris vs 1.45 for TransINVEST), with xG against 1.22 vs 1.25, so both teams create and concede chances at a similar level. Although Žalgiris has more clean sheets (40% vs 27%) and concedes 1.0 goal on average in the last 5 matches, the visitors’ last 5 matches ended BTTS in 80% of cases versus 40% for the home side, therefore the edge is with BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Estimated xG (attack average and opponent xG) gives 1.34 for Žalgiris ((1.42+1.25)/2) and 1.34 for TransINVEST ((1.45+1.22)/2), totaling ~2.68 expected goals. Both teams show strong signals for Over 1.5: Žalgiris has seasonOver15 70%, TransINVEST 91%, and in the last 5 matches Žalgiris scored on average 1.6 and conceded 1.0, while TransINVEST scored 1.2 and conceded 1.4. TransINVEST has a season goals average of 2.09, higher shot efficiency (conversion 17% vs 10%) and more shots on target (4.91 vs 3.4), and both teams have BTTS at 60% and 64% respectively, increasing the likelihood of additional goals. Considering the expected 2.68 goals, the high Over 1.5 percentages (70%/91%) and recent Over 2.5 runs (last5: 80% for Žalgiris, 60% for TransINVEST), I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal; Over 2.5 also makes sense (~72%), while Over 3.5 remains risky (~38%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a TransINVEST win at full-time (X/2) — in the last 5 matches for both teams a half-time draw occurred in 80% of cases (last 5 matches: 80% for home side and 80% for away). TransINVEST has better full-match metrics: 55% wins this season and on average 2.09 goals scored per game versus Žalgiris’s 1.3, more shots on target (4.91 vs 3.4) and a higher conversion rate of 17% versus 10%. After the break TransINVEST also dominates — on average scoring 1.09 goals in the second half compared to the home side’s 0.5 and with 36% second-half wins versus Žalgiris’s 20%, which suggests a turnaround after half-time. The xG of both teams is similar (1.42 for Žalgiris and 1.45 for TransINVEST), so the visitors’ advantage is mainly due to higher efficiency and greater activity after the break; additionally Žalgiris have 80% clean sheets at half-time, which explains the high likelihood of an HT draw.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
8Shots17
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
5Shots on target5
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
1.34xG2.2
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
5Corners10
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
66Dangerous attacks107
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
11Fouls12
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
3Cards1
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
1.43Goals scored / match1.71
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
1.1Goals conceded / match1.19
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
57%Average possession48%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
4.24Shots on target / match4.19
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.24Shots per match12.38
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
4.24Shots on target4.19
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
10%Shot conversion13.8%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
57%Possession48%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
1.59xG for1.43
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
1.28xG against1.24
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

Shooting quality

Žalgiris: DominantTransINVEST Vilnius: Efficient finishing
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
Accuracy (shots on target)30%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Žalgiris is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Žalgiris · 1.4 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius

Žalgiris
WWLDW
Season result split
43% W24% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-7
1.52 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%
TransINVEST Vilnius
WLWDL
Season result split
48% W24% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-6
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.43 goals / match - Žalgiris · 1.71 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius

Žalgiris is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.1 goals / match - Žalgiris · 1.19 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius

Žalgiris scoring profile: strong

Žalgiris scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

TransINVEST Vilnius scoring profile: strong

TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Žalgiris keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

30Goals scored (season)36
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
23Goals conceded (season)25
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
2.52Average goals in match2.9
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
9Goals scored (last 5)7
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal86%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
38%2 goals52%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
29%3 goals19%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
5%4 goals10%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal67%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
33%2 goals38%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
19%3 goals14%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
0%4 goals0%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
TransINVEST Vilnius - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 21 matches
48%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time29%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
5%BTTS in both halves5%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
24%Scored in both halves38%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
24%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
20%BTTS - last 580%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Žalgiris · 1.81 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius

Žalgiris - half-time state
33% leading43% draw24% trailing
TransINVEST Vilnius - half-time state
48% leading38% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.81
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.9
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.33
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
62%Clean sheet before half-time62%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
48%No goal before half-time29%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.14
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.57
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
57%Clean sheet after half-time48%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius
57%No goal after half-time48%
ŽalgirisTransINVEST Vilnius

Žalgiris - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
30
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results

29% W29% R43% P
38
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Žalgiris - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
TransINVEST Vilnius - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Žalgiris
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
5
31-45
6
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

TransINVEST Vilnius
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
8
5
31-45
6
3
46-60
7
5
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Žalgiris

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

TransINVEST Vilnius

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

ŽalgirisLigaTransINVEST Vilnius
Average goals in match 2.522.58 2.90
Both teams scored 43%48% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%54% 71%
Clean sheets 43%32% 33%
Goal before half-time 71%68% 81%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ŽalgirisGoalStanislav Bilenkiy
  2. ŽalgirisYellow cardStanislav Bilenkiy
  3. ŽalgirisGoalNikola PetkovićAssist: Dominik Franke
  4. ŽalgirisGoalNikola PetkovićAssist: Ivan Lytvynenko
  5. TransINVEST VilniusGoalStefan MiloševićAssist: Mykola Musolitin
  6. ŽalgirisSubstitutionOn: Saba MamatsashviliOff: Dominik Franke
  7. ŽalgirisYellow cardDanny Koy Lupano
  8. ŽalgirisSubstitutionOn: Liviu Ion AntalOff: Nikola Petković
  9. TransINVEST VilniusSubstitutionOn: Nojus PetkusOff: Yehor Hlushach
  10. ŽalgirisYellow cardStanislav Bilenkiy

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Žalgiris 0 - 0 - 2 TransINVEST Vilnius. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Žalgiris vs TransINVEST Vilnius?

The A Lyga match finished Žalgiris 3:1 TransINVEST Vilnius. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Žalgiris and TransINVEST Vilnius?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Žalgiris won 0, TransINVEST Vilnius won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Žalgiris vs TransINVEST Vilnius?

Žalgiris score 1.43 goals per game on average and TransINVEST Vilnius 1.71. The A Lyga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Žalgiris's matches and 62% of TransINVEST Vilnius's.

What form are Žalgiris and TransINVEST Vilnius in?

Over the last 5 games Žalgiris have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and TransINVEST Vilnius 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Žalgiris vs TransINVEST Vilnius?

The statistical background for Žalgiris vs TransINVEST Vilnius — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.