Azerbaijan - Premyer LiqasıZirə qəsəbə stadionuData current as of 03 November 2026

Zira vs Qabala: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Zira vs Qabala: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zira play Qabala in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match date is 7 November 2026. Venue: Zirə qəsəbə stadionu.

Current form

Zira: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Qabala: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zira scores 1.40 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Qabala scores 0.50 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zira 60%, Qabala 30%. Over 2.5: Zira 40%, Qabala 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Zira has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.15. Zira: 9.6 shots per match, Qabala: 9.8.

Match halves

Zira: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.90. Qabala: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.20.

Goals by minute

Zira: 76-90+ (5 goals). Qabala: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premyer Liqası: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-0. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match0.5
ZiraQabala
1.4Goals conceded / match1.6
ZiraQabala
57%Average possession47%
ZiraQabala
4.3Shots on target / match2.8
ZiraQabala

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.6Shots per match9.8
ZiraQabala
4.3Shots on target2.8
ZiraQabala
14.6%Shot conversion5.1%
ZiraQabala
57%Possession47%
ZiraQabala
1.36xG for1.15
ZiraQabala
1.28xG against1.48
ZiraQabala

Shooting quality

Zira: Efficient finishingQabala: Balanced
ZiraQabala
Accuracy (shots on target)45%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zira is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Zira · 0.8 pts / match - Qabala

Zira
LDDWD
Season result split
40% W40% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-2
1.60 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Qabala
LLLWD
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-6
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 away
1-0-3
LLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zira is 180% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Zira · 0.5 goals / match - Qabala

Zira is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - Zira · 1.6 goals / match - Qabala

Zira scoring profile: very strong

Zira scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Qabala keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).

Qabala scoring profile: mixed

Qabala scores in 30% of matches (3 of 10 matches), while Zira keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).

14Goals scored (season)5
ZiraQabala
14Goals conceded (season)16
ZiraQabala
2.8Average goals in match2.1
ZiraQabala
7Goals scored (last 5)3
ZiraQabala
7Goals conceded (last 5)12
ZiraQabala

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal30%
ZiraQabala
40%2 goals20%
ZiraQabala
20%3 goals0%
ZiraQabala
0%4 goals0%
ZiraQabala

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
ZiraQabala
30%2 goals30%
ZiraQabala
10%3 goals30%
ZiraQabala
10%4 goals20%
ZiraQabala

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time30%
ZiraQabala
10%BTTS in both halves0%
ZiraQabala
30%Scored in both halves20%
ZiraQabala

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
ZiraQabala
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
ZiraQabala
80%BTTS - last 540%
ZiraQabala

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
ZiraQabala
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
ZiraQabala
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
ZiraQabala

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
ZiraQabala
70%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
ZiraQabala
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
ZiraQabala

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zira is 167% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Zira · 0.6 pts / match - Qabala

Zira - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Qabala - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)0.6
ZiraQabala
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.3
ZiraQabala
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
ZiraQabala
1Average goals (1st half)1.1
ZiraQabala
70%Clean sheet before half-time40%
ZiraQabala
60%No goal before half-time70%
ZiraQabala

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)0.9
ZiraQabala
0.9Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
ZiraQabala
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
ZiraQabala
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1
ZiraQabala
20%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ZiraQabala
30%No goal after half-time80%
ZiraQabala

Zira - second-half results

30% W50% D20% L
16
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qabala - second-half results

20% W30% D50% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Zira - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Qabala - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zira
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
5
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Qabala
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
4
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
4
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zira

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Qabala

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

ZiraLigaQabala
Average goals in match▲ 2.802.60▼ 2.10
Both teams scored▲ 60%52%▼ 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 40%48%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 20%29%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%66%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 90%79%▼ 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Zira 3 - 0 - 0 Qabala. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

When do Zira and Qabala play?

Zira face Qabala on 7 November 2026 in Premyer Liqası at Zirə qəsəbə stadionu. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Zira and Qabala?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Zira won 3, Qabala won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Zira vs Qabala?

Zira score 1.40 goals per game on average and Qabala 0.50. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Zira's matches and 30% of Qabala's.

What form are Zira and Qabala in?

Over the last 5 games Zira have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Qabala 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zira vs Qabala?

The statistical background for Zira vs Qabala — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.