Saudi Arabia - First DivisionPrince Mohammed bin Abdul Aziz StadiumData current as of 16 October 2026

Al Ula vs Al Raed: match statistics

Al Ula crest
Al Ula
2 : 0half-time 2:0
Al Raed crest
Al Raed

Al Ula vs Al Raed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Ula played Al Raed in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 2 September 2026. Venue: Prince Mohammed bin Abdul Aziz Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Al Ula: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Al Raed: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Ula scores 2.00 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Al Raed scores 1.50 and concedes 1.50. League average: 1.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Ula 50%, Al Raed 50%. Over 2.5: Al Ula 50%, Al Raed 50%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 27%.

xG, shots and style

Al Ula has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.01. Al Ula: 15.0 shots per match, Al Raed: 8.5.

Match halves

Al Ula: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. Al Raed: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Al Ula: 0-15 (1 goals). Al Raed: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 1.92 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 27%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Ula sit in 2nd place, having won both of their league matches so far, and boast a perfect home record, averaging 3 goals scored per game. The hosts create significantly more danger, averaging 13 shots and 7 on target, compared with Al Raed’s 8 attempts and just 1 shot on target, while their xG stands at 1.61 versus 0.82 for the visitors. Al Raed kept a clean sheet away from home and won their only match, but they allow opponents an average of 1.70 xG, which is a significant warning sign given Al Ula’s attacking potential. Recent form also favours the hosts, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in the process, while the visitors’ record stands at 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats. The possession advantage, 60% to 37%, should help Al Ula control the tempo and tilt the result in their favour.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The recent form of both teams points towards goals at both ends: Al Ula have recorded BTTS in 60% of their last five matches, identical to Al Raed. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while the visitors scored 2.0 and allowed their opponents 1.6 goals on average. Al Ula have a 0% clean-sheet rate, while the average xG against both teams is high and similar, standing at 1.64 for the hosts and 1.66 for the visitors. A note of caution is Al Raed’s lower seasonal xG of 0.82 and their 39% BTTS rate in the league, but the visitors’ current attacking output supports the expectation that they will score. The most likely scenario is therefore that both teams will score at least one goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Al Ula’s last five matches produced an average of 1.8 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while Al Raed averaged 2.0 goals per game during this period, conceding 1.6. Their attacking potential is reflected in the xG figures: 1.41 for the hosts and 1.03 for the visitors, alongside elevated xG allowed by both teams, at 1.64 and 1.66 respectively. The 2.5 line was surpassed in 80% of Al Ula’s last five matches and in 60% of Al Raed’s games, although the low league average of 2.0 goals calls for caution with higher lines. The strongest pick is therefore Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 2.63 goals and the current output of both teams clearly support a scenario featuring at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is for Al Ula to lead at the break and for the home side to win, although the edge is not decisive. In their last five matches, Al Ula won 60% of games and scored an average of 1.8 goals, while Al Raed won 40% and conceded an average of 1.6 goals. The hosts also have a more favourable chance-creation profile: their average xG stands at 1.21 compared with 0.82 for the visitors, while they average 3 shots on target per goal against just 1 for Al Raed. In the first halves of their last five matches, both teams took the lead in 60% of games, but Al Ula conceded only 0.4 goals per match during those periods, compared with 0.8 for their opponents. The hosts have performed better on average after the break, while Al Raed lost the second half in 60% of their last five appearances, supporting the expectation that the home advantage will be maintained until full time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Al UlaAl Raed
18Shots6
Al UlaAl Raed
5Shots on target2
Al UlaAl Raed
1.84xG0.8
Al UlaAl Raed
5Corners1
Al UlaAl Raed
48Dangerous attacks37
Al UlaAl Raed
8Fouls7
Al UlaAl Raed
1Cards2
Al UlaAl Raed

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.5
Al UlaAl Raed
0.5Goals conceded / match1.5
Al UlaAl Raed
60%Average possession55%
Al UlaAl Raed
7Shots on target / match2
Al UlaAl Raed

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15Shots per match8.5
Al UlaAl Raed
7Shots on target2
Al UlaAl Raed
13.3%Shot conversion17.6%
Al UlaAl Raed
60%Possession55%
Al UlaAl Raed
1.83xG for1.01
Al UlaAl Raed
1.1xG against1.61
Al UlaAl Raed

Shooting quality

Al Ula: DominantAl Raed: Efficient finishing
Al UlaAl Raed
Accuracy (shots on target)47%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.75

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Ula is 100% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Al Ula · 1.5 pts / match - Al Raed

Al Ula
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Al Raed
WL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.01Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Ula is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Al Ula · 1.5 goals / match - Al Raed

Al Ula is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.5 goals / match - Al Ula · 1.5 goals / match - Al Raed

Al Ula scoring profile: very strong

Al Ula scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Al Raed keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Al Raed scoring profile: very strong

Al Raed scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Al Ula keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

4Goals scored (season)3
Al UlaAl Raed
1Goals conceded (season)3
Al UlaAl Raed
2.5Average goals in match3
Al UlaAl Raed
4Goals scored (last 5)3
Al UlaAl Raed
1Goals conceded (last 5)3
Al UlaAl Raed

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Al UlaAl Raed
50%2 goals50%
Al UlaAl Raed
50%3 goals0%
Al UlaAl Raed
0%4 goals0%
Al UlaAl Raed

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
Al UlaAl Raed
0%2 goals50%
Al UlaAl Raed
0%3 goals50%
Al UlaAl Raed
0%4 goals0%
Al UlaAl Raed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
Al UlaAl Raed
0%BTTS in both halves50%
Al UlaAl Raed
50%Scored in both halves50%
Al UlaAl Raed

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Al UlaAl Raed
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Al UlaAl Raed
50%BTTS - last 550%
Al UlaAl Raed

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Al UlaAl Raed
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Al UlaAl Raed
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Al UlaAl Raed

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Al UlaAl Raed
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Al UlaAl Raed
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Al UlaAl Raed

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Ula - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Al Raed - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)2
Al UlaAl Raed
1Goals scored (1st half)1
Al UlaAl Raed
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Al UlaAl Raed
1Average goals (1st half)1.5
Al UlaAl Raed
100%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Al UlaAl Raed
50%No goal before half-time0%
Al UlaAl Raed

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)0.5
Al UlaAl Raed
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Al UlaAl Raed
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Al UlaAl Raed
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Al UlaAl Raed
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Al UlaAl Raed
0%No goal after half-time50%
Al UlaAl Raed

Al Ula - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Raed - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Ula - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match1.01.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Al Raed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.50
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.51.0
Average goals in match1.51.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Ula
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Raed
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
143%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Ula

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
235%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Al Raed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
176%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 67% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

Al UlaLigaAl Raed
Average goals in match▲ 2.501.92▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 50%46%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%27%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%38%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%58%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%69%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.92
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.85
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+-21%
Home attack advantage
+-27%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Al UlaGoalSylla Sow
  2. Al RaedYellow cardYousef Saad Al Harbi
  3. Al RaedSubstitutionOn: Mohammed Al SufyaniOff: Yousef Saad Al Harbi
  4. Al UlaYellow cardSylla Sow
  5. Al UlaSubstitutionOn: Abdulfattah Mohamed AdamOff: Sylla Sow
  6. Al RaedYellow cardMohammed Al Sufyani

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Al Ula 1 - 0 - 1 Al Raed. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Al Ula vs Al Raed?

The First Division match finished Al Ula 2:0 Al Raed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Al Ula and Al Raed?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Ula won 1, Al Raed won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Ula vs Al Raed?

Al Ula score 2.00 goals per game on average and Al Raed 1.50. The First Division average is 1.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Al Ula's matches and 50% of Al Raed's.

What form are Al Ula and Al Raed in?

Over the last 5 games Al Ula have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Al Raed 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ula vs Al Raed?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.