Indonesia - Liga 1Stadion KanjuruhanData current as of 19 September 2026

Arema vs Persik Kediri: match statistics

Arema crest
Arema
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Persik Kediri crest
Persik Kediri

Arema vs Persik Kediri: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arema played Persik Kediri in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 18 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Kanjuruhan. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Arema: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Persik Kediri: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arema scores 3.50 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Persik Kediri scores 1.00 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arema 50%, Persik Kediri 0%. Over 2.5: Arema 100%, Persik Kediri 0%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Persik Kediri has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.08. Arema: 3.5 shots per match, Persik Kediri: 8.0.

Match halves

Arema: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00. Persik Kediri: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Arema: 0-15 (2 goals). Persik Kediri: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Arema sit higher in the table, in 4th place compared with Persik Kediri in 8th, and have scored 7 goals while conceding just 3 in their three matches so far. The hosts won their only home game by an emphatic 4:0 scoreline, collecting all three points and keeping a clean sheet, which significantly strengthens their home advantage. In their last five matches, Arema have scored 10 goals, while Persik have netted 6 and conceded as many as 9; their record over this period stands at 2 wins and 3 defeats. Persik won their only away match 2:0, but an average xG of 0,86 against 1,24 xG conceded suggests they create fewer high-quality chances than they allow their opponents. Arema’s attacking edge and very strong opening home performance point towards a home win, although the limited sample size increases the risk of a closely contested match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as the share of matches in which both teams scored stands at 0% for both sides in the available league data, while Persik Kediri has kept a clean sheet in 100% of its matches. Arema has yet to score in this dataset, despite averaging 1.83 xG and 4 shots on target per match, which indicates a clear finishing problem. Persik averages 2.0 goals, but its lower xG of 0.86 and just 4 shots per match reduce confidence that both teams will score. The last five matches provide slightly more support for goals, with Arema recording BTTS in 40% of matches and Persik in 20%; however, both figures are clearly below the league average of 61%. A scenario in which at least one team fails to score is therefore more likely than a goal exchange.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest form of both teams points to an open game: in their last five matches, Arema averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while Persik Kediri scored 1.2 and allowed opponents to score 1.8 goals. In the same sample, 60% of each team’s matches went over 2.5 goals, clearly supporting at least two goals in the game. Arema’s attacking potential is further confirmed by an average of 12 shots and 4 shots on target, while Persik allows opponents an xG of 1.24. On the other hand, the current season data is very limited, and all previous matches involving both teams stayed under 2.5 goals, meaning the edge for Over 2.5 is only marginal. The strongest pick remains Over 1.5, as the projected total of 2.65 goals provides a clear margin above this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Arema have shown a clearly stronger profile in the first halves of their last five matches: they led at the break in 60% of those games, scoring an average of 1.6 goals and conceding just 0.6. Over the same period, Persik Kediri scored only 0.6 goals before half-time, were behind at the break in 40% of their matches, and conceded an average of 0.8 goals. The hosts also create more chances, recording an xG of 1.83 and 12 shots per match, compared with the visitors’ xG of 0.86 and four shots. Across their last five matches, Arema have averaged 2.0 goals scored, while Persik have conceded 1.8, further supporting the scenario of the hosts maintaining their advantage after the interval. Although Persik won the only match included in the current sample 2-0, Arema’s superior current attacking output and first-half form make the HT/FT 1/1 outcome—Arema leading at the break and winning the match—the most likely scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
AremaPersik Kediri
11Shots8
AremaPersik Kediri
4Shots on target2
AremaPersik Kediri
1.41xG1.12
AremaPersik Kediri
7Corners6
AremaPersik Kediri
61Dangerous attacks65
AremaPersik Kediri
-1Fouls-1
AremaPersik Kediri
2Cards3
AremaPersik Kediri

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3.5Goals scored / match1
AremaPersik Kediri
1.5Goals conceded / match0.5
AremaPersik Kediri
45%Average possession58%
AremaPersik Kediri
2Shots on target / match3.5
AremaPersik Kediri

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.5Shots per match8
AremaPersik Kediri
2Shots on target3.5
AremaPersik Kediri
100%Shot conversion12.5%
AremaPersik Kediri
45%Possession58%
AremaPersik Kediri
1.08xG for1.35
AremaPersik Kediri
2.65xG against1.26
AremaPersik Kediri

Shooting quality

Arema: Counter-attackingPersik Kediri: Balanced
AremaPersik Kediri
Accuracy (shots on target)57%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.310.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.750.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Arema is 33% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Arema · 1.5 pts / match - Persik Kediri

Arema
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 2.65BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 100%
Persik Kediri
LW
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 250% better for: goals scored per match.

3.5 goals / match - Arema · 1 goals / match - Persik Kediri

Persik Kediri is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Arema · 0.5 goals / match - Persik Kediri

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Persik Kediri keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Persik Kediri scoring profile: mixed

Persik Kediri scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

7Goals scored (season)2
AremaPersik Kediri
3Goals conceded (season)1
AremaPersik Kediri
5Average goals in match1.5
AremaPersik Kediri
7Goals scored (last 5)2
AremaPersik Kediri
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
AremaPersik Kediri

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
AremaPersik Kediri
100%2 goals50%
AremaPersik Kediri
100%3 goals0%
AremaPersik Kediri
50%4 goals0%
AremaPersik Kediri

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
AremaPersik Kediri
50%2 goals0%
AremaPersik Kediri
50%3 goals0%
AremaPersik Kediri
0%4 goals0%
AremaPersik Kediri

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
AremaPersik Kediri
50%BTTS in both halves0%
AremaPersik Kediri
100%Scored in both halves50%
AremaPersik Kediri

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
AremaPersik Kediri
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AremaPersik Kediri
50%BTTS - last 50%
AremaPersik Kediri

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
AremaPersik Kediri
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
AremaPersik Kediri
100%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AremaPersik Kediri

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
AremaPersik Kediri
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
AremaPersik Kediri
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
AremaPersik Kediri

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arema is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / match - Arema · 1.5 pts / match - Persik Kediri

Arema - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
Persik Kediri - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)1.5
AremaPersik Kediri
2.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AremaPersik Kediri
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
AremaPersik Kediri
3Average goals (1st half)1
AremaPersik Kediri
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
AremaPersik Kediri
0%No goal before half-time50%
AremaPersik Kediri

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)2
AremaPersik Kediri
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
AremaPersik Kediri
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0
AremaPersik Kediri
2Average goals (2nd half)0.5
AremaPersik Kediri
50%Clean sheet after half-time100%
AremaPersik Kediri
0%No goal after half-time50%
AremaPersik Kediri

Arema - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
6
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persik Kediri - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Arema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.50
Goals scored / match2.51.0
Goals conceded / match0.51.0
Average goals in match3.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%50%
3 goals100%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 5
Persik Kediri - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.502.00
Goals scored / match0.50.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match1.00.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arema
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Persik Kediri
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+3.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+2.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
215%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.5
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Persik Kediri

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.76
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
31%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

AremaLigaPersik Kediri
Average goals in match 5.002.95 1.50
Both teams scored 50%63% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%53% 0%
Clean sheets 50%18% 50%
Goal before half-time 100%84% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%84% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Persik KediriGoalZanadin Fariz
  2. Persik KediriYellow cardFrancisco Pereira Carneiro
  3. AremaSubstitutionOn: Leo GuntaraOff: Johan Ahmad Farisi
  4. AremaSubstitutionOn: Alfeandra DewanggaOff: Arkhan Fikri
  5. AremaYellow cardAlfeandra Dewangga
  6. Persik KediriYellow cardMuhammad Daffa Salman Zahran Sidik
  7. Persik KediriYellow cardMarcelo Amado Djaló Taritolay
  8. Persik KediriSubstitutionOn: Adi Eko JayantoOff: Krisna Bayu Otto Kartika

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Arema 1 - 0 - 1 Persik Kediri. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Arema vs Persik Kediri?

The Liga 1 match finished Arema 1:1 Persik Kediri. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Arema and Persik Kediri?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Arema won 1, Persik Kediri won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs Persik Kediri?

Arema score 3.50 goals per game on average and Persik Kediri 1.00. The Liga 1 average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Arema's matches and 0% of Persik Kediri's.

What form are Arema and Persik Kediri in?

Over the last 5 games Arema have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Persik Kediri 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs Persik Kediri?

The statistical background for Arema vs Persik Kediri — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.