Latvia - VirsligaĶekavas stadionsData current as of 31 August 2026

Auda vs Liepāja: match statistics

Auda crest
Auda
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Liepāja crest
Liepāja

Auda vs Liepāja: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Auda played Liepāja in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 25 August 2026. Venue: Ķekavas stadions. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Auda: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Liepāja: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Liepāja scores 1.38 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Auda 52%, Liepāja 58%. Over 2.5: Auda 52%, Liepāja 62%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.60. Auda: 13.3 shots per match, Liepāja: 13.5.

Match halves

Auda: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.88. Liepāja: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Auda: 31-45+ (11 goals). Liepāja: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda sit 3rd, while Liepāja are 5th, with the hosts boasting a clearly stronger season record: 14 wins and 39 goals scored compared with the visitors’ 10 victories and 33 goals. Current form also favours Auda, who have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in the process, whereas Liepāja have suffered 3 defeats and found the net just 6 times. At home, Auda average 1.91 goals per match, while Liepāja score only 0.93 away from home and fail to score in 36% of such fixtures. The hosts also create more convincing chances on their own ground, posting an average xG of 1.66, while the visitors’ defence allows opponents an xG of 1.54 and concedes an average of 1.86 goals away from home. Liepāja do average 15 shots per away match, but convert just 6% of their attempts; combined with Auda’s 15% shot-conversion rate, this further strengthens the forecast for a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is primarily supported by Auda’s profile: both teams scored in 64% of their matches, compared with 50% for Liepāja and 56% on average in the league. The hosts score an average of 1.82 goals, while Liepāja concede as many as 1.86 per match, making an Auda goal highly likely. On the visitors’ side, their average goals scored stands at only 0.93, but their xG reaches 1.70, while Auda have kept a clean sheet in just 18% of matches. In Liepāja’s last five games, BTTS landed in 60% of fixtures and they produced an average of 1.83 xG, strengthening the chances of them scoring despite their low 6% shot conversion rate. The main risks to the pick are Liepāja’s 36% of matches without a goal and Auda’s BTTS rate of only 40% in their latest run, but the hosts’ attacking advantage and the visitors’ weak defence tilt the forecast towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Auda average 1.82 goals at home, while Liepāja concede as many as 1.86 away from home, clearly strengthening the prospect of at least two goals. The Over 1.5 goals line has landed in 91% of Auda’s matches and 79% of Liepāja’s, with the league average standing at 2.98 goals. Both teams have confirmed their attacking potential in their last five matches: their average xG figures are 1.89 and 1.83 respectively, while opponents allowed chances worth 1.36 and 1.57 xG. The hosts scored 9 goals during this period, whereas Liepāja conceded 8, which is why the expected 1.70 to 1.15 goal balance supports Over 1.5 as the strongest signal. The 2.5 line also has positive indicators, but its historical hit rates of 64% and 57% are clearly less stable.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Auda have a clear advantage in the first halves: they were leading at the break in 7 of 11 matches, or 64%, while Liepāja were trailing at half-time in 9 of 14 games, also 64%. The hosts score an average of 1.00 goals before the break and concede just 0.36, whereas the visitors score only 0.36 goals during this period and allow their opponents to score 1.07. Auda’s advantage is maintained throughout the match, as shown by their averages of 1.82 goals scored and 1.00 conceded, along with a 55% win rate, compared with Liepāja’s 0.93 goals scored, 1.86 conceded and 57% loss rate. In their last five matches, Auda have won four times and were leading at half-time in 60% of their games, while Liepāja were trailing after the first half in 60% of those matches. The most logical scenario is therefore for the hosts to take an early lead and see out the victory until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
AudaLiepāja
8Shots8
AudaLiepāja
1Shots on target1
AudaLiepāja
0.93xG0.86
AudaLiepāja
1Corners4
AudaLiepāja
46Dangerous attacks39
AudaLiepāja
13Fouls17
AudaLiepāja
0Cards4
AudaLiepāja

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.68Goals scored / match1.38
AudaLiepāja
1.04Goals conceded / match1.46
AudaLiepāja
60%Average possession51%
AudaLiepāja
4.64Shots on target / match4.73
AudaLiepāja

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.28Shots per match13.54
AudaLiepāja
4.64Shots on target4.73
AudaLiepāja
12.7%Shot conversion10.2%
AudaLiepāja
60%Possession51%
AudaLiepāja
1.63xG for1.6
AudaLiepāja
1.1xG against1.5
AudaLiepāja

Shooting quality

Auda: BalancedLiepāja: Balanced
AudaLiepāja
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Auda · 1.8 pts / match - Liepāja

Auda
LDWWW
Season result split
60% W16% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-4-6
1.96 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Liepāja
LWLWW
Season result split
42% W15% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-11
1.42 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.09Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1.68 goals / match - Auda · 1.38 goals / match - Liepāja

Auda is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.04 goals / match - Auda · 1.46 goals / match - Liepāja

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 matches).

Liepāja scoring profile: strong

Liepāja scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 matches).

42Goals scored (season)36
AudaLiepāja
26Goals conceded (season)38
AudaLiepāja
2.72Average goals in match2.85
AudaLiepāja
6Goals scored (last 5)9
AudaLiepāja
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
AudaLiepāja

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal73%
AudaLiepāja
48%2 goals42%
AudaLiepāja
16%3 goals15%
AudaLiepāja
4%4 goals8%
AudaLiepāja

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal85%
AudaLiepāja
28%2 goals35%
AudaLiepāja
12%3 goals15%
AudaLiepāja
4%4 goals8%
AudaLiepāja

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time8%
AudaLiepāja
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AudaLiepāja
36%Scored in both halves23%
AudaLiepāja

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
AudaLiepāja
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
AudaLiepāja
20%BTTS - last 580%
AudaLiepāja

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
AudaLiepāja
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
AudaLiepāja
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
AudaLiepāja

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
AudaLiepāja
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
AudaLiepāja
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
AudaLiepāja

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.64 pts / match - Auda · 1.31 pts / match - Liepāja

Auda - half-time state
44% leading32% draw24% trailing
Liepāja - half-time state
38% leading15% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.64Points per match (1st half)1.31
AudaLiepāja
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.65
AudaLiepāja
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
AudaLiepāja
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.38
AudaLiepāja
60%Clean sheet before half-time46%
AudaLiepāja
36%No goal before half-time58%
AudaLiepāja

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.35
AudaLiepāja
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
AudaLiepāja
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
AudaLiepāja
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.46
AudaLiepāja
60%Clean sheet after half-time38%
AudaLiepāja
40%No goal after half-time46%
AudaLiepāja

Auda - second-half results

36% W48% R16% P
41
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Liepāja - second-half results

35% W31% R35% P
34
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Liepāja - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
6
5
16-30
11
6
31-45
9
4
46-60
7
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
8
6
31-45
8
6
46-60
2
4
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

AudaLigaLiepāja
Average goals in match 2.723.01 2.85
Both teams scored 52%56% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%56% 62%
Clean sheets 40%24% 15%
Goal before half-time 80%76% 88%
Goal after half-time 76%82% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.72
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LiepājaYellow cardDanila Patijčuks
  2. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: N'Guetta EkouOff: Irad Mshindi Ambugo
  3. AudaSubstitutionOn: Andrews AppiahOff: Kader Kone
  4. LiepājaYellow cardN'Guetta Ekou
  5. LiepājaYellow cardBart Straalman
  6. LiepājaYellow cardN'Guetta Ekou

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Auda 3 - 1 - 2 Liepāja. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Auda
3 : 1
Liepāja
Liepāja
1 : 2
Auda
FK Auda Riga
1 : 2
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
2 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Liepāja
0 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
3 : 0
FK Liepāja

FAQ

What was the result of Auda vs Liepāja?

The Virsliga match finished Auda 1:0 Liepāja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Auda and Liepāja?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Auda won 3, Liepāja won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs Liepāja?

Auda score 1.68 goals per game on average and Liepāja 1.38. The Virsliga average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Auda's matches and 58% of Liepāja's.

What form are Auda and Liepāja in?

Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Liepāja 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs Liepāja?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs Liepāja: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.