Netherlands - Eerste DivisieAFAS TrainingscomplexData current as of 31 August 2026

AZ II vs MVV: match statistics

AZ II crest
AZ II
1 : 2half-time 0:1
MVV crest
MVV

AZ II vs MVV: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AZ II played MVV in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 28 August 2026. Venue: AFAS Trainingscomplex. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

AZ II: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match. MVV: 3-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

AZ II scores 2.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. MVV scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AZ II 67%, MVV 67%. Over 2.5: AZ II 67%, MVV 67%. League level: BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

AZ II has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.46. AZ II: 13.3 shots per match, MVV: 12.3.

Match halves

AZ II: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.67. MVV: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.33.

Goals by minute

AZ II: 76-90+ (3 goals). MVV: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eerste Divisie: 3.67 goals per match, BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

MVV sit 2nd and remain unbeaten after three league matches, while AZ II are only 13th with a record of 1 win and 2 defeats. The visitors have won every away fixture, scoring an average of 3 goals per match, whereas AZ II are yet to score at home and lost their only match there. MVV’s superiority is also evident in chance creation: they average 16 shots and 7 on target, compared with AZ II’s 8 shots and 5 on target, while their xG stands at 1.77 versus the hosts’ 1.31. AZ II have conceded 9 goals in their last five matches, and their lwlwl run highlights their lack of consistency. MVV’s defence is not flawless either, as they concede an average of 2 goals away from home, but their consistent scoring and significantly stronger league position point to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear, as MVV have recorded BTTS in 100% of their away matches so far, averaging 3.0 goals scored and keeping no clean sheets. AZ II have also failed to score in none of their home matches, while their average of 1.5 goals aligns well with MVV’s away defensive record of conceding an average of 2.0 goals. The visitors create plenty of chances, averaging 16.0 shots and 7.0 shots on target per match, with an xG of 1.77, so despite AZ II keeping clean sheets in 50% of their matches, their goal remains very realistic. The teams’ last five matches show a lower BTTS rate of 40% each, but AZ II conceded an average of 1.8 goals during this period, while their opponents generated an xG of 1.63 against them. Further support for the “Yes” selection comes from the league profile, where BTTS has landed in 75% of matches, making it more likely that neither team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The 3.00-goal projection is based on both teams’ strong chance creation: AZ II have recorded an xG of 2.13 over their last five matches, while MVV have posted 1.30. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.6 goals scored but conceded 1.8, giving the visitors a clear route to finding the net. MVV average 3.0 goals in their away matches and register 7.0 shots on target per game, while AZ II allow opponents an xG of 1.26. Over 1.5 goals has landed in every MVV match, and the league-wide average is a high 3.64 goals. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as even in a more cautious scenario, two goals are clearly more likely than the line failing to be reached.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a MVV win at full-time, as both teams were level at the break in all matches included in the current sample, while over their last five matches this occurred in 60% of AZ II’s games and 100% of MVV’s. The first halves have also been low-scoring: AZ II average 0.4 goals before the break, and MVV likewise average 0.4, reinforcing the X HT outcome. After the interval, the visitors have the better recent form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and scoring an average of 0.8 goals, whereas AZ II have lost 3 of their last 5 games and concede 1.2 goals per match after half-time. MVV also show greater attacking potential in the season data: they average 16 shots and 7 on target, compared with AZ II’s 10.5 and 4, while their xG stands at 1.77 against 1.31 for the hosts. AZ II’s strong home record is a risk to the pick, but MVV’s advantage in current form and chance-creation quality supports a turnaround in the visitors’ favour only after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
AZ IIMVV
8Shots4
AZ IIMVV
3Shots on target3
AZ IIMVV
1.07xG0.87
AZ IIMVV
5Corners4
AZ IIMVV
47Dangerous attacks55
AZ IIMVV
10Fouls12
AZ IIMVV
0Cards0
AZ IIMVV

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match2
AZ IIMVV
2Goals conceded / match1
AZ IIMVV
50%Average possession53%
AZ IIMVV
6.67Shots on target / match5
AZ IIMVV

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.33Shots per match12.33
AZ IIMVV
6.67Shots on target5
AZ IIMVV
15%Shot conversion16.2%
AZ IIMVV
50%Possession53%
AZ IIMVV
1.68xG for1.46
AZ IIMVV
1.75xG against1.34
AZ IIMVV

Shooting quality

AZ II: Efficient finishingMVV: Efficient finishing
AZ IIMVV
Accuracy (shots on target)50%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MVV is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - AZ II · 3 pts / match - MVV

AZ II
LWL
Season result split
33% W0% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%
MVV
WWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MVV is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - AZ II · 1 goals / match - MVV

AZ II scoring profile: strong

AZ II scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while MVV keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

MVV scoring profile: very strong

MVV scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while AZ II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

6Goals scored (season)6
AZ IIMVV
6Goals conceded (season)3
AZ IIMVV
4Average goals in match3
AZ IIMVV
6Goals scored (last 5)6
AZ IIMVV
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
AZ IIMVV

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
AZ IIMVV
33%2 goals67%
AZ IIMVV
33%3 goals33%
AZ IIMVV
33%4 goals0%
AZ IIMVV

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal67%
AZ IIMVV
67%2 goals33%
AZ IIMVV
33%3 goals0%
AZ IIMVV
0%4 goals0%
AZ IIMVV

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time67%
AZ IIMVV
33%BTTS in both halves33%
AZ IIMVV
33%Scored in both halves67%
AZ IIMVV

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
AZ IIMVV
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AZ IIMVV
67%BTTS - last 567%
AZ IIMVV

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
AZ IIMVV
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
AZ IIMVV
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AZ IIMVV

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
AZ IIMVV
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
AZ IIMVV
67%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
AZ IIMVV

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AZ II - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
MVV - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1
AZ IIMVV
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.67
AZ IIMVV
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
AZ IIMVV
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.33
AZ IIMVV
67%Clean sheet before half-time33%
AZ IIMVV
67%No goal before half-time33%
AZ IIMVV

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)3
AZ IIMVV
1.67Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
AZ IIMVV
1.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
AZ IIMVV
3.33Average goals (2nd half)1.67
AZ IIMVV
0%Clean sheet after half-time67%
AZ IIMVV
33%No goal after half-time0%
AZ IIMVV

AZ II - second-half results

33% W0% R67% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.3

Concedes 1.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MVV - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AZ II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.31.7
Goals conceded / match0.31.7
Average goals in match0.73.3
1 goal33%100%
2 goals33%67%
3 goals0%67%
Clean sheet67%0%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1
MVV - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.003.00
Goals scored / match0.71.3
Goals conceded / match0.70.3
Average goals in match1.31.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal33%0%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 67% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AZ II
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

MVV
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AZ II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

MVV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).

Teams vs league

AZ IILigaMVV
Average goals in match 4.003.67 3.00
Both teams scored 67%73% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%67% 67%
Clean sheets 0%13% 33%
Goal before half-time 33%80% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.67
Average goals per match
73%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
13%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.87
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
10%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
37%
3 goals
20%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AZ IISubstitutionOn: Yoël van den BanOff: Melle Roede
  2. MVVSubstitutionOn: Stan Van DesselOff: Robert Klaasen
  3. MVVSubstitutionOn: Toni VinogradacOff: Elias Sierra
  4. AZ IISubstitutionOn: Jerolldino ArmantradingOff: Tycho de Wit
  5. AZ IIGoalJulian OeripAssist: Andrea Natali
  6. AZ IISubstitutionOn: Frej Elkjær AndersenOff: Julian Sijbrands

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): AZ II 1 - 1 - 0 MVV. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of AZ II vs MVV?

The Eerste Divisie match finished AZ II 1:2 MVV. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between AZ II and MVV?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches AZ II won 1, MVV won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before AZ II vs MVV?

AZ II score 2.00 goals per game on average and MVV 2.00. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 67% of AZ II's matches and 67% of MVV's.

What form are AZ II and MVV in?

Over the last 5 games AZ II have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and MVV 3-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AZ II vs MVV?

The statistical background for AZ II vs MVV — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.