Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraChamazi StadiumData current as of 01 September 2026

Azam vs Pamba Jiji: match statistics

Azam crest
Azam
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Pamba Jiji crest
Pamba Jiji

Azam vs Pamba Jiji: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Azam played Pamba Jiji in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: Chamazi Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Azam: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Pamba Jiji: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Azam scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Pamba Jiji scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Azam 100%, Pamba Jiji 100%. Over 2.5: Azam 50%, Pamba Jiji 50%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Azam has higher xG: 1.43 vs 0.82. Azam: 6.0 shots per match, Pamba Jiji: 4.0.

Match halves

Azam: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Azam: 0-15 (1 goals). Pamba Jiji: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Azam have shown significantly better form in their last five matches: they won 3 games, scored 7 goals and conceded only 4. Pamba Jiji also scored 7 goals during this period, but suffered as many as 3 defeats and conceded 7 goals, indicating greater defensive problems. The hosts averaged 1.4 goals per game in their last five outings, while their opponents conceded an average of 1.4 goals, which favors Azam. The difference is also reflected in the points tally from those five matches: Azam averaged 2 points, compared with just 0.8 for Pamba Jiji. Both teams began the season with 1:1 draws, but the current trend and the hosts’ more solid defence point towards an Azam victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No pick is primarily based on the league’s low scoring rate, with an average of just 1.9 goals per match, while both teams average 1.0 goal per game this season. Azam conceded only 0.8 goals per match across their last five fixtures, while Pamba Jiji generated just 0.65 xG on average, limiting the visitors’ chances of scoring. The hosts do have 1.37 xG over their last five matches and scored 7 goals during that period, so a narrow home win remains a realistic scenario. At the same time, Azam’s BTTS rate in their last five matches was only 20%, while the league-wide rate for both teams scoring stands at 40%. Therefore, it is more likely that at least one side will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The league average is just 1.9 goals per match, with only 20% of games going Over 2.5 goals, clearly favoring a low-scoring outcome. Azam have scored 7 goals and conceded 4 in their last five matches, with an average xG of 1.37 and 1.09 xG conceded. Pamba Jiji have also scored 7 goals in their last five appearances, but their attacking xG is only 0.65, making it difficult to expect the visitors to significantly increase the match tempo. An estimated 1.12 goals for Azam and 0.78 for Pamba Jiji gives a total of 1.90 goals, so Under 3.5 has the strongest support based on the league profile and the quality of chances created.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Azam have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Pamba Jiji have suffered 3 defeats over the same period and averaged only 0.8 points per match compared with the hosts’ 2.0. In the first halves, Azam led at the break in 40% of their recent matches, conceding just 0.2 goals before half-time, whereas Pamba Jiji were trailing at half-time in 40% of cases and conceded 0.8 goals during that period. The hosts also have a clearly superior record in the opening 45 minutes: they score an average of 0.8 goals and kept a clean sheet in 80% of those half-time periods, compared with 20% for the visitors. After the break, both teams averaged 0.6 goals scored per match, so Azam’s early advantage has a relatively strong chance of being maintained. A draw at half-time followed by an Azam win remains a close alternative, but the highest probability lies with the hosts leading both at half-time and at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
AzamPamba Jiji
15Shots5
AzamPamba Jiji
7Shots on target1
AzamPamba Jiji
1.85xG0.74
AzamPamba Jiji
6Corners4
AzamPamba Jiji
57Dangerous attacks48
AzamPamba Jiji
16Fouls18
AzamPamba Jiji
0Cards0
AzamPamba Jiji

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1
AzamPamba Jiji
1Goals conceded / match1.5
AzamPamba Jiji
50%Average possession47%
AzamPamba Jiji
4.5Shots on target / match2
AzamPamba Jiji

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6Shots per match4
AzamPamba Jiji
4.5Shots on target2
AzamPamba Jiji
25%Shot conversion25%
AzamPamba Jiji
50%Possession47%
AzamPamba Jiji
1.43xG for0.82
AzamPamba Jiji
1.76xG against0.84
AzamPamba Jiji

Shooting quality

Azam: Efficient finishingPamba Jiji: Counter-attacking
AzamPamba Jiji
Accuracy (shots on target)75%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Azam is 300% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Azam · 0.5 pts / match - Pamba Jiji

Azam
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%
Pamba Jiji
DL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 0.82Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Azam · 1 goals / match - Pamba Jiji

Azam is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Azam · 1.5 goals / match - Pamba Jiji

Azam scoring profile: very strong

Azam scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Pamba Jiji scoring profile: very strong

Pamba Jiji scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)2
AzamPamba Jiji
2Goals conceded (season)3
AzamPamba Jiji
2.5Average goals in match2.5
AzamPamba Jiji
3Goals scored (last 5)2
AzamPamba Jiji
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
AzamPamba Jiji

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
AzamPamba Jiji
50%2 goals0%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%3 goals0%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%4 goals0%
AzamPamba Jiji

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%2 goals50%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%3 goals0%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%4 goals0%
AzamPamba Jiji

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%Scored in both halves0%
AzamPamba Jiji

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AzamPamba Jiji
100%BTTS - last 5100%
AzamPamba Jiji

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
AzamPamba Jiji
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AzamPamba Jiji

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
AzamPamba Jiji
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
AzamPamba Jiji

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Azam · 0.5 pts / match - Pamba Jiji

Azam - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Pamba Jiji - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)0.5
AzamPamba Jiji
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AzamPamba Jiji
0Goals conceded (1st half)1.5
AzamPamba Jiji
1Average goals (1st half)2
AzamPamba Jiji
100%Clean sheet before half-time0%
AzamPamba Jiji
50%No goal before half-time50%
AzamPamba Jiji

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)2
AzamPamba Jiji
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
AzamPamba Jiji
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0
AzamPamba Jiji
1.5Average goals (2nd half)0.5
AzamPamba Jiji
0%Clean sheet after half-time100%
AzamPamba Jiji
50%No goal after half-time50%
AzamPamba Jiji

Azam - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pamba Jiji - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Azam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.50
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.01.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Pamba Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.502.00
Goals scored / match0.50.5
Goals conceded / match1.50.0
Average goals in match2.00.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Azam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Pamba Jiji
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.76
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Pamba Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

AzamLigaPamba Jiji
Average goals in match 2.502.63 2.50
Both teams scored 100%58% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%42% 50%
Clean sheets 0%21% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%79% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%79% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+50%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Abdul Hamisi Suleiman⚽ 1
Henoc Molia⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AzamGoalHenoc Molia
  2. AzamGoalAbdul Hamisi Suleiman

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Azam 1 - 1 - 0 Pamba Jiji. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Azam vs Pamba Jiji?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Azam 2:1 Pamba Jiji. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Azam and Pamba Jiji?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Azam won 1, Pamba Jiji won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Azam vs Pamba Jiji?

Azam score 1.50 goals per game on average and Pamba Jiji 1.00. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Azam's matches and 100% of Pamba Jiji's.

What form are Azam and Pamba Jiji in?

Over the last 5 games Azam have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Pamba Jiji 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Azam vs Pamba Jiji?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.