Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 22 October 2026

Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II: match statistics

Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Beitar / Riga Mariners played Tukums II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Final score: 4:2.

Current form

Beitar / Riga Mariners: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Tukums II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Beitar / Riga Mariners scores 2.00 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Tukums II scores 1.27 and concedes 2.73. League average: 3.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Beitar / Riga Mariners 60%, Tukums II 73%. Over 2.5: Beitar / Riga Mariners 60%, Tukums II 67%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Beitar / Riga Mariners has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.52. Beitar / Riga Mariners: 11.7 shots per match, Tukums II: 10.5.

Match halves

Beitar / Riga Mariners: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 1.07. Tukums II: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Beitar / Riga Mariners: 0-15 (7 goals). Tukums II: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.56 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Beitar / Riga Mariners sit 3rd, while Tukums II are only 11th. The hosts’ overall season record stands at 9 wins, 5 draws and just 1 defeat, compared with 3 wins and 9 losses for the visitors. At home, the hosts are unbeaten, averaging 1.71 goals scored and creating chances worth 1.72 xG, whereas Tukums II lose 71% of their away matches. The visitors’ defensive weakness is also crucial: they concede as many as 3.86 goals per away game, with an average xG against of 2.49, and have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away fixture. Recent form also favours the hosts, who have scored 12 goals in their last five matches, while Tukums II have managed just 4 and conceded 15. Beitar should also control possession, averaging 54% of the ball compared with 44% for their opponents.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is the most likely outcome, as both teams have recorded this scenario frequently this season: in 75% of the hosts’ matches and 71% of Tukums II’s games, compared with the league average of 63%. Tukums II have kept no clean sheets and concede as many as 3.86 goals per match on average, while the hosts have recently been scoring 2.4 goals per game. The visitors average 1.29 goals per match this season, while Beitar / Riga Mariners concede 1.75, with an xG against of 1.62, giving the away side a realistic route to scoring. Although Tukums II have scored only 0.8 goals per game across their last five matches, their xG over that period stands at 1.67, indicating that their finishing has been below the quality of the chances created. The main risk to this pick is the visitors’ BTTS rate falling to 40% over their last five league matches; however, Tukums II’s very weak defence and both teams’ strong season-long attacking profile provide clearer support for the “Yes” option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Beitar / Riga Mariners average 1.66 xG at home, while Tukums II allow as much as 2.49 xG away from home and concede an average of 3.86 goals per match. The hosts are also in good attacking form, having scored 12 goals in their last five matches, averaging 2.4 per game. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 0% of matches, while at least three goals were scored in 86% of their league games and at least four in 86%. Even with Tukums II’s recent decline in finishing, their matches have produced an average of 3.8 goals across their last five outings, largely due to the 15 goals they conceded. Over 1.5 is the strongest selection, as both teams have recorded at least two goals in 100% of their matches this season, while the visitors’ defensive profile clearly supports further goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to the home side leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until the final whistle: in their last five matches, Beitar / Riga Mariners were ahead at half-time in 60% of games, while Tukums II had not led at half-time in any of them. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.2 goals scored before the break and conceded 0.6, whereas the visitors failed to score in any first half and conceded an average of 1.8 goals. The quality gap is also evident in the season data: Beitar average 1.66 xG compared with Tukums’ 1.30 xG, while the visitors’ defence allows as much as 2.49 xG and concedes 3.86 goals per match. Tukums II have lost 71% of their matches this season, and they have also been behind in 71% of second halves, increasing the likelihood of the hosts confirming a favourable result after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
-1Shots-1
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
-1Shots on target-1
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
0xG0
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
-1Corners-1
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
0Dangerous attacks0
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
-1Fouls-1
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
-1Cards-1
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
2Goals scored / match1.27
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
0.87Goals conceded / match2.73
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
50%Average possession42%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
5.47Shots on target / match4.47
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.67Shots per match10.47
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
5.47Shots on target4.47
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
17.1%Shot conversion12.1%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
50%Possession42%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
1.78xG for1.52
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
1.25xG against1.96
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

Shooting quality

Beitar / Riga Mariners: Efficient finishingTukums II: Counter-attacking
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
Accuracy (shots on target)47%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 0.8 pts / match - Tukums II

Beitar / Riga Mariners
WWLDW
Season result split
60% W33% D7% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-1
2.13 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Tukums II
LLWLD
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-9
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-5
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.93BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 57% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 1.27 goals / match - Tukums II

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 214% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.87 goals / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 2.73 goals / match - Tukums II

Beitar / Riga Mariners scoring profile: very strong

Beitar / Riga Mariners scores in 100% of matches (15 of 15 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

Tukums II scoring profile: very strong

Tukums II scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Beitar / Riga Mariners keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

30Goals scored (season)19
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
13Goals conceded (season)41
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
2.87Average goals in match4
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
11Goals scored (last 5)4
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
3Goals conceded (last 5)15
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal87%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
67%2 goals27%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
27%3 goals7%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
7%4 goals7%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal87%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
27%2 goals67%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
0%3 goals47%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
0%4 goals27%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
Beitar / Riga Mariners - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 15 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time27%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
33%Scored in both halves13%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
40%BTTS - last 540%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 179% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.87 pts / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 0.67 pts / match - Tukums II

Beitar / Riga Mariners - half-time state
53% leading27% draw20% trailing
Tukums II - half-time state
13% leading27% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.87Points per match (1st half)0.67
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)1.4
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.8
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
67%Clean sheet before half-time27%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
40%No goal before half-time67%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.87Points per match (2nd half)1.13
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1.33
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
1.47Average goals (2nd half)2.2
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II
33%No goal after half-time33%
Beitar / Riga MarinersTukums II

Beitar / Riga Mariners - second-half results

53% W27% D20% L
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tukums II - second-half results

33% W13% D53% L
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Beitar / Riga Mariners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Tukums II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.81.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-9-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Beitar / Riga Mariners
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
6
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
7
1
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Tukums II
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
8
16-30
3
9
31-45
3
6
46-60
2
7
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
87%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Beitar / Riga Mariners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Tukums II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.77
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Beitar / Riga MarinersLigaTukums II
Average goals in match▼ 2.873.56▲ 4.00
Both teams scored▼ 60%62%▲ 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 60%68%• 67%
Clean sheets▲ 40%21%▼ 13%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%75%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▼ 80%86%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.56
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.96
Home goals / match
1.59
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Algirdas Gražis⚽ 2 · A 1
—Yevhen Stadnik⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Ilja AtliginsA 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Beitar / Riga MarinersAssistAlgirdas Gražis
  2. Beitar / Riga MarinersGoalAlgirdas Gražis
  3. Beitar / Riga MarinersGoalAlgirdas Gražis
  4. Tukums IIAssistIlja Atligins
  5. Beitar / Riga MarinersGoalYevhen Stadnik

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Beitar / Riga Mariners 3 - 0 - 0 Tukums II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Tukums II
1 : 3
Beitar / Riga Mariners
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II
0 : 4
FK Beitar / Riga Mariners
FK Beitar / Riga Mariners
4 : 0
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II

FAQ

What was the result of Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II?

The 1. Liga match finished Beitar / Riga Mariners 4:2 Tukums II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Beitar / Riga Mariners and Tukums II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Beitar / Riga Mariners won 3, Tukums II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II?

Beitar / Riga Mariners score 2.00 goals per game on average and Tukums II 1.27. The 1. Liga average is 3.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's matches and 73% of Tukums II's.

What form are Beitar / Riga Mariners and Tukums II in?

Over the last 5 games Beitar / Riga Mariners have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tukums II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Beitar / Riga Mariners vs Tukums II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.