Mexico - Ascenso MXData current as of 23 July 2026

CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero: match statistics

CA La Paz crest
CA La Paz
1 : 2half-time 1:1
CDS Tampico Madero crest
CDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CA La Paz play CDS Tampico Madero in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 05:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

CA La Paz: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. CDS Tampico Madero: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

CA La Paz scores 1.60 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. CDS Tampico Madero scores 1.38 and concedes 0.98. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CA La Paz 60%, CDS Tampico Madero 57%. Over 2.5: CA La Paz 57%, CDS Tampico Madero 43%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

CA La Paz has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.32. CA La Paz: 13.5 shots per match, CDS Tampico Madero: 11.6.

Match halves

CA La Paz: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.70. CDS Tampico Madero: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

CA La Paz: 31-45+ (13 goals). CDS Tampico Madero: 46-60 (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ascenso MX: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.

Match description

Visitors are in markedly better form: in the last 5 matches they scored 7 goals, won 3 and drew 2, averaging 2.2 points per game; hosts scored only 4 goals, failed to win (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses) and average 0.6 points per game over that period. In the season CDS Tampico Madero has 19 wins and 48 goals versus CA La Paz’s 9 wins and 47 goals, indicating the visitors’ advantage in wins and consistency. Hosts, however, dominate creation at home: on average 16.07 shots and 7.07 on target per match, 57% possession, xG 1.91 and 1.86 home goals per match with only 7% of matches without scoring; visitors away average 9.53 shots, 3.47 on target, xG 1.19, 1.00 goal and 29% of matches without scoring. Defensively the advantage lies with the visitors — they concede 1.06 goals on average away and only 3 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas hosts concede 1.43 goals at home. Considering the superior win record (19 vs 9), clearly better recent points average (2.2 vs 0.6) and the visitors’ solid defense, I tip a visitor victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
27Shots10
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
12Shots on target7
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
3.06xG1.33
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
7Corners2
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
74Dangerous attacks29
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
14Fouls14
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
5Cards4
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.6Goals scored / match1.38
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.53Goals conceded / match0.98
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
54%Average possession52%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
5.53Shots on target / match3.88
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.47Shots per match11.64
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
5.53Shots on target3.88
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
11.9%Shot conversion11.9%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
54%Possession52%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.6xG for1.32
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.67xG against1.34
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Shooting quality

CA La Paz: BalancedCDS Tampico Madero: Balanced
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
Accuracy (shots on target)41%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CDS Tampico Madero is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - CA La Paz · 1 pts / match - CDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz
LDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
CDS Tampico Madero
DDLLW
Season result split
52% W29% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
22-12-8
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-8-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.94Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CA La Paz is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - CA La Paz · 1.38 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero

CDS Tampico Madero is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.53 goals / match - CA La Paz · 0.98 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz scoring profile: very strong

CA La Paz scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while CDS Tampico Madero keeps a clean sheet in 31% (13 of 42 matches).

CDS Tampico Madero scoring profile: very strong

CDS Tampico Madero scores in 76% of matches (32 of 42 matches), while CA La Paz keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

48Goals scored (season)58
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
46Goals conceded (season)41
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
3.13Average goals in match2.36
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
4Goals scored (last 5)6
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal76%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
47%2 goals40%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
27%3 goals17%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
3%4 goals5%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal69%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
47%2 goals19%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
20%3 goals7%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
7%4 goals2%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
CDS Tampico Madero - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.24 of 42 matches
57%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time19%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
13%BTTS in both halves5%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
30%Scored in both halves31%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
80%BTTS - last 560%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CA La Paz - half-time state
37% leading37% draw27% trailing
CDS Tampico Madero - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.5
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.6
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.67Average goals (1st half)1
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
50%Clean sheet before half-time60%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
37%No goal before half-time52%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)1.62
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.36
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
43%Clean sheet after half-time57%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
50%No goal after half-time40%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz - second-half results

30% W40% R30% P
44
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CDS Tampico Madero - second-half results

43% W33% R24% P
63
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
68
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CA La Paz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
CDS Tampico Madero - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CA La Paz
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
7
10
16-30
13
9
31-45
4
9
46-60
6
7
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

CDS Tampico Madero
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
13
5
16-30
8
7
31-45
15
7
46-60
5
6
61-75
13
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CA La Paz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

CDS Tampico Madero

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).

Teams vs league

CA La PazLigaCDS Tampico Madero
Average goals in match 3.132.85 2.36
Both teams scored 60%57% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%53% 43%
Clean sheets 27%25% 31%
Goal before half-time 80%74% 69%
Goal after half-time 77%80% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+53%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): CA La Paz 0 - 1 - 2 CDS Tampico Madero. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?

The Ascenso MX match finished CA La Paz 1:2 CDS Tampico Madero. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CA La Paz and CDS Tampico Madero?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches CA La Paz won 0, CDS Tampico Madero won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?

CA La Paz score 1.60 goals per game on average and CDS Tampico Madero 1.38. The Ascenso MX average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 60% of CA La Paz's matches and 57% of CDS Tampico Madero's.

What form are CA La Paz and CDS Tampico Madero in?

Over the last 5 games CA La Paz have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and CDS Tampico Madero 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?

The statistical background for CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.