El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 20 September 2026

Cacahuatique vs Inter: match statistics

Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Inter crest
Inter

Cacahuatique vs Inter: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cacahuatique played Inter in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Cacahuatique: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Inter: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cacahuatique scores 1.38 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Inter scores 1.50 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cacahuatique 75%, Inter 25%. Over 2.5: Cacahuatique 63%, Inter 50%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Cacahuatique: 9.6 shots per match, Inter: 7.3.

Match halves

Cacahuatique: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.88. Inter: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.13.

Goals by minute

Cacahuatique: 76-90+ (4 goals). Inter: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter head into the match in significantly better form: they have won 4 of their last 5 games, scoring 10 goals and averaging 2.4 points per match, while Cacahuatique have failed to win any of their last five fixtures, scoring just 3 goals. The hosts have a clear defensive issue at home, conceding an average of 2.17 goals per game and keeping a clean sheet in only 17% of matches. Inter are considerably more solid defensively away from home, recording a clean sheet in 60% of their outings and conceding just 1 goal on average, although their average xG against stands at 1.80, meaning Cacahuatique should be able to create chances. The visitors also hold an advantage in possession, averaging 66% compared with the hosts’ 49%, while their away-match xG is 1.42 versus Cacahuatique’s 1.30 at home. The risk of a draw remains significant, as Inter have drawn 40% of their away matches and failed to score in 40% of them, but their current run and the hosts’ poor form point towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as both teams have recorded low rates of matches with goals from both sides throughout the season: Cacahuatique 33% and Inter just 20%, compared with 46% league-wide. The hosts concede an average of only 0.33 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 67% of their games, which significantly limits Inter’s chances of scoring. Inter also has a 60% clean-sheet rate, while Cacahuatique has scored just 3 goals in its last five matches, averaging 0.6 per game. Although the teams’ xG figures are similar—1.46 for the hosts and 1.42 for the visitors—Cacahuatique’s current attacking form and the strong defensive metrics of both sides more strongly support a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to a moderate number of goals: the league average is 2.52 goals, while Cacahuatique concede just 0.33 goals per home match. Inter have kept a clean sheet in 60% of their matches, and the hosts have scored only 0.6 goals per game across their last 5 matches, despite averaging 1.39 xG. The visitors are in better attacking form, averaging 2.0 goals scored in their last five appearances, but their xG of 1.34 suggests a result closer to one goal than a high-scoring game. Seasonal trends support this assessment: 67% of the hosts’ matches and 80% of Inter’s matches have finished with under 3.5 goals, making Under 3.5 the clearest value bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Inter victory, as Cacahuatique drew the first half in 60% of their last five matches, compared with 40% for Inter. Current form clearly favors the visitors: Inter have won 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.0 goals scored and just 0.8 conceded, while the hosts have won none, scoring only 0.6 goals per match. After the break, Inter are particularly dangerous, averaging 1.6 goals in their last five appearances compared with Cacahuatique’s 0.4, while their goal difference in those second halves stands at +7. The hosts do have an excellent overall home record, averaging 2.33 points and 2.0 goals per match, but their downturn in form and Inter’s efficiency after the interval increase the likelihood of the X/2 outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
CacahuatiqueInter
11Shots10
CacahuatiqueInter
4Shots on target8
CacahuatiqueInter
1.8xG1.99
CacahuatiqueInter
4Corners4
CacahuatiqueInter
113Dangerous attacks109
CacahuatiqueInter
10Fouls18
CacahuatiqueInter
0Cards0
CacahuatiqueInter

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match1.5
CacahuatiqueInter
1.75Goals conceded / match0.75
CacahuatiqueInter
49%Average possession55%
CacahuatiqueInter
3.75Shots on target / match3.5
CacahuatiqueInter

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.63Shots per match7.25
CacahuatiqueInter
3.75Shots on target3.5
CacahuatiqueInter
14.3%Shot conversion20.7%
CacahuatiqueInter
49%Possession55%
CacahuatiqueInter
1.44xG for1.44
CacahuatiqueInter
1.51xG against1.56
CacahuatiqueInter

Shooting quality

Cacahuatique: Efficient finishingInter: Efficient finishing
CacahuatiqueInter
Accuracy (shots on target)39%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Cacahuatique · 2.4 pts / match - Inter

Cacahuatique
DDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W50% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-3
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Inter
WWWWL
Season result split
50% W38% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-1
1.88 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Cacahuatique · 1.5 goals / match - Inter

Inter is 133% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.75 goals / match - Cacahuatique · 0.75 goals / match - Inter

Cacahuatique scoring profile: mixed

Cacahuatique scores in 75% of matches (6 of 8 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 matches).

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 63% of matches (5 of 8 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).

11Goals scored (season)12
CacahuatiqueInter
14Goals conceded (season)6
CacahuatiqueInter
3.13Average goals in match2.25
CacahuatiqueInter
3Goals scored (last 5)10
CacahuatiqueInter
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
CacahuatiqueInter

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal63%
CacahuatiqueInter
38%2 goals50%
CacahuatiqueInter
13%3 goals25%
CacahuatiqueInter
13%4 goals13%
CacahuatiqueInter

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal38%
CacahuatiqueInter
63%2 goals25%
CacahuatiqueInter
25%3 goals13%
CacahuatiqueInter
13%4 goals0%
CacahuatiqueInter

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time13%
CacahuatiqueInter
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CacahuatiqueInter
25%Scored in both halves25%
CacahuatiqueInter

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
CacahuatiqueInter
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
CacahuatiqueInter
60%BTTS - last 520%
CacahuatiqueInter

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
CacahuatiqueInter
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
CacahuatiqueInter
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
CacahuatiqueInter

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
CacahuatiqueInter
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
CacahuatiqueInter
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
CacahuatiqueInter

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Cacahuatique · 1.25 pts / match - Inter

Cacahuatique - half-time state
13% leading63% draw25% trailing
Inter - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.25
CacahuatiqueInter
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.38
CacahuatiqueInter
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
CacahuatiqueInter
1.25Average goals (1st half)1
CacahuatiqueInter
63%Clean sheet before half-time75%
CacahuatiqueInter
63%No goal before half-time63%
CacahuatiqueInter

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)2
CacahuatiqueInter
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
CacahuatiqueInter
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.13
CacahuatiqueInter
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.25
CacahuatiqueInter
50%Clean sheet after half-time88%
CacahuatiqueInter
38%No goal after half-time50%
CacahuatiqueInter

Cacahuatique - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.41.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Inter
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
4
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
168%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.81
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CacahuatiqueLigaInter
Average goals in match 3.132.54 2.25
Both teams scored 75%48% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%46% 50%
Clean sheets 25%33% 63%
Goal before half-time 50%60% 50%
Goal after half-time 75%71% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+44%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cacahuatique 2 - 0 - 1 Inter. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Cacahuatique vs Inter?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 0:2 Inter. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and Inter?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 2, Inter won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs Inter?

Cacahuatique score 1.38 goals per game on average and Inter 1.50. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Cacahuatique's matches and 25% of Inter's.

What form are Cacahuatique and Inter in?

Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Inter 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs Inter?

The statistical background for Cacahuatique vs Inter — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.