Wales - Welsh Premier LeagueDeeside College StadiumData current as of 15 October 2026

Connah's Quay vs Penybont: match statistics

Connah's Quay crest
Connah's Quay
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Penybont crest
Penybont

Connah's Quay vs Penybont: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Connah's Quay played Penybont in Welsh Premier League (Wales). The match was played on 3 October 2026. Venue: Deeside College Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Connah's Quay: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Penybont: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Connah's Quay scores 2.45 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Penybont scores 2.00 and concedes 0.82. League average: 3.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Connah's Quay 55%, Penybont 64%. Over 2.5: Connah's Quay 73%, Penybont 64%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Connah's Quay has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.43. Connah's Quay: 13.0 shots per match, Penybont: 11.0.

Match halves

Connah's Quay: half-time lead 73%, second-half goals 1.18. Penybont: half-time lead 64%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

Connah's Quay: 16-30 (5 goals). Penybont: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Welsh Premier League: 3.34 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Penybont head into the match on the back of five consecutive wins, while Connah's Quay have won 3 of their last 5 games. The visitors remain unbeaten this season and have won 80% of their away matches, giving them a slight edge despite playing on their opponents' turf. Both teams regularly create good chances: the hosts average 1.80 xG at home, compared with the visitors' 1.82 xG away; Penybont also average 6.6 shots on target per match, versus 5.83 for Connah's Quay. However, the hosts have a strong defensive case: they concede an average of just 0.5 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches, while the visitors concede 0.8 goals away. This defensive solidity increases the chances of a draw, but Penybont's winning streak and the visitors' average of 2.6 goals scored away point to a narrow preference for the away side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a high rate of matches in which both sides score: 67% for Connah's Quay and 60% for Penybont, compared with 54% league-wide. In their last five matches, this scenario occurred in 60% of games for each team, with the home side scoring an average of 2.0 goals and the away side 2.4. Penybont show greater attacking strength, averaging 1.82 xG and 6.6 shots on target per match, compared with Connah's Quay's 1.10 xG and 2.83 shots on target. Solid defences pose a risk to the BTTS - Yes pick, with the teams conceding an average of 0.83 and 0.80 goals respectively. However, their BTTS records and scoring form give a moderate edge to the outcome in which both teams find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Penybont score an average of 2.6 goals per match, compared with 1.5 for Connah's Quay, pointing to at least two goals. Across their last five matches, the teams averaged 2.4 and 2.0 goals per match, respectively, and in both cases 60% of those games finished Over 2.5 goals. The visitors create more chances: their xG is 1.82 compared with the hosts' 1.10, and they average 6.6 shots on target against 2.83. With Over 1.5 goals landing in 80% of Penybont matches and 67% of Connah's Quay matches, this line offers a stronger signal than the more demanding 2.5-goal threshold.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is a realistic outcome, as Connah's Quay have not conceded in the first half of any of their last 5 matches and went into the break level in 3 of them. However, Penybont have averaged 1.6 first-half goals across their last 5 games and were leading at the break in 3, so the away side to lead at half-time remains almost equally likely. Over the full match, the attacking advantage favours Penybont: the visitors average 2.6 goals compared with the hosts' 1.5, while their average xG is 1.82 versus 1.10. Penybont have won all 5 of their last matches, while Connah's Quay have won 3 of 5; in addition, season data shows the visitors average 0.8 goals after half-time compared with 0.5 for the hosts. Therefore, I rate the scenario in which the hosts hold the match level at the break before the visitors win after half-time marginally highest.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Connah's QuayPenybont
9Shots10
Connah's QuayPenybont
3Shots on target6
Connah's QuayPenybont
1.15xG1.38
Connah's QuayPenybont
3Corners3
Connah's QuayPenybont
50Dangerous attacks44
Connah's QuayPenybont
8Fouls17
Connah's QuayPenybont
0Cards6
Connah's QuayPenybont

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Connah's QuayPenybont
2.45Goals scored / match2
Connah's QuayPenybont
0.73Goals conceded / match0.82
Connah's QuayPenybont
57%Average possession57%
Connah's QuayPenybont
5.18Shots on target / match4.55
Connah's QuayPenybont

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match11
Connah's QuayPenybont
5.18Shots on target4.55
Connah's QuayPenybont
18.9%Shot conversion18.2%
Connah's QuayPenybont
57%Possession57%
Connah's QuayPenybont
1.76xG for1.43
Connah's QuayPenybont
0.94xG against1.17
Connah's QuayPenybont

Shooting quality

Connah's Quay: Efficient finishingPenybont: Efficient finishing
Connah's QuayPenybont
Accuracy (shots on target)40%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.470.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Penybont is 50% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Connah's Quay · 3 pts / match - Penybont

Connah's Quay
DLWWW
Season result split
73% W9% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-2
2.27 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Penybont
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
73% W27% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-0
2.45 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Connah's Quay is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

2.45 goals / match - Connah's Quay · 2 goals / match - Penybont

Connah's Quay is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.73 goals / match - Connah's Quay · 0.82 goals / match - Penybont

Connah's Quay scoring profile: very strong

Connah's Quay scores in 100% of matches (11 of 11 matches), while Penybont keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

Penybont scoring profile: very strong

Penybont scores in 91% of matches (10 of 11 matches), while Connah's Quay keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 matches).

27Goals scored (season)22
Connah's QuayPenybont
8Goals conceded (season)9
Connah's QuayPenybont
3.18Average goals in match2.82
Connah's QuayPenybont
10Goals scored (last 5)12
Connah's QuayPenybont
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
Connah's QuayPenybont

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal91%
Connah's QuayPenybont
64%2 goals64%
Connah's QuayPenybont
45%3 goals27%
Connah's QuayPenybont
18%4 goals9%
Connah's QuayPenybont

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal64%
Connah's QuayPenybont
18%2 goals18%
Connah's QuayPenybont
0%3 goals0%
Connah's QuayPenybont
0%4 goals0%
Connah's QuayPenybont

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time27%
Connah's QuayPenybont
0%BTTS in both halves9%
Connah's QuayPenybont
45%Scored in both halves36%
Connah's QuayPenybont

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
Connah's QuayPenybont
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Connah's QuayPenybont
60%BTTS - last 560%
Connah's QuayPenybont

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Connah's QuayPenybont
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Connah's QuayPenybont
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Connah's QuayPenybont

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Connah's QuayPenybont
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Connah's QuayPenybont
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Connah's QuayPenybont

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Connah's Quay is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.45 pts / match - Connah's Quay · 2.18 pts / match - Penybont

Connah's Quay - half-time state
73% leading27% draw0% trailing
Penybont - half-time state
64% leading27% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.45Points per match (1st half)2.18
Connah's QuayPenybont
1.27Goals scored (1st half)1.36
Connah's QuayPenybont
0.09Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Connah's QuayPenybont
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.73
Connah's QuayPenybont
91%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Connah's QuayPenybont
27%No goal before half-time27%
Connah's QuayPenybont

After half-time (2nd half)

1.73Points per match (2nd half)1.36
Connah's QuayPenybont
1.18Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
Connah's QuayPenybont
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
Connah's QuayPenybont
1.82Average goals (2nd half)1.09
Connah's QuayPenybont
55%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Connah's QuayPenybont
27%No goal after half-time45%
Connah's QuayPenybont

Connah's Quay - second-half results

45% W36% D18% L
27
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 73% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Penybont - second-half results

27% W55% D18% L
24
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 64% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Connah's Quay - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Penybont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Connah's Quay
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
5
0
16-30
5
1
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Penybont
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
10
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
91%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Connah's Quay

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.82
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.90
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Penybont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.92
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Welsh Premier League).

Teams vs league

Connah's QuayLigaPenybont
Average goals in match▼ 3.183.34▼ 2.82
Both teams scored▲ 55%53%▲ 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 73%61%▲ 64%
Clean sheets▲ 45%24%▲ 36%
Goal before half-time▼ 73%78%▲ 82%
Goal after half-time▲ 91%86%▼ 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.34
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PenybontYellow cardTom Mehew
  2. PenybontYellow cardDaniel Barrow
  3. PenybontYellow cardDaniel Jefferies
  4. Connah's QuaySubstitutionOn: Rhys WatsonOff: James Oliver Jones
  5. PenybontYellow cardLiam Shephard
  6. PenybontYellow cardMarinho Manga
  7. PenybontYellow cardEthan Vaughan
  8. Connah's QuayGoalHussein Mehasseb
  9. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Ioan PhillipsOff: Marinho Manga
  10. Connah's QuaySubstitutionOn: Conor James PartridgeOff: Iwan Murray

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Connah's Quay 3 - 1 - 0 Penybont. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Connah's Quay Nomads FC
2 : 1
Penybont FC
Penybont FC
0 : 0
Connah's Quay Nomads FC
Connah's Quay Nomads FC
4 : 0
Penybont FC
Penybont FC
0 : 1
Connah's Quay Nomads FC

FAQ

What was the result of Connah's Quay vs Penybont?

The Welsh Premier League match finished Connah's Quay 1:0 Penybont. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Connah's Quay and Penybont?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Connah's Quay won 3, Penybont won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Connah's Quay vs Penybont?

Connah's Quay score 2.45 goals per game on average and Penybont 2.00. The Welsh Premier League average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Connah's Quay's matches and 64% of Penybont's.

What form are Connah's Quay and Penybont in?

Over the last 5 games Connah's Quay have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Penybont 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Connah's Quay vs Penybont?

The statistical background for Connah's Quay vs Penybont — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.