FAS vs Cacahuatique: match statistics
FAS vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FAS played Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
FAS: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Cacahuatique: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
FAS scores 2.20 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Cacahuatique scores 1.20 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FAS 55%, Cacahuatique 57%. Over 2.5: FAS 57%, Cacahuatique 57%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
FAS has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.41. FAS: 10.9 shots per match, Cacahuatique: 8.8.
Match halves
FAS: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.23. Cacahuatique: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.52.
Goals by minute
FAS: 76-90+ (29 goals). Cacahuatique: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Salvadoran Primera División: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 40%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FAS is the clear favorite: at home they average 2.33 goals per match and win 81% of home fixtures, while Cacahuatique average 1.36 goals away and win 45% of their road games. The hosts create more and better chances – 12.33 average shots and 5.52 shots on target per match versus 8.23 shots and 4.55 on target for the visitors, and their home xG is 1.58 compared to the visitors’ 1.30 xG, which combined with conversion rates of 19% vs 17% results in a higher goal output. Defensively FAS also looks more reliable: they concede only 0.76 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 43% of games, whereas Cacahuatique concedes 1.18 goals on average away and have 32% clean sheets. Recent form confirms the home advantage — in the last five matches FAS scored 12 goals and average 2 points per game, while Cacahuatique managed only 4 goals and average 1 point per game. Based on this I tip a home win, estimating their chance at about 74%, a draw at 14% and an away win at 12%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates of 59% (FAS) and 55% (Cacahuatique), averaging 57% and exceeding the league mean of 54%. xG figures show FAS produces 1.52 xG while conceding 1.59, and Cacahuatique produces 1.30 xG while conceding 1.48 — both sides generate roughly 1.3–1.6 xG per game. Additionally, FAS concedes on average 1.55 goals at home, while Cacahuatique scores on average 1.36 goals; shots on target stats 4.05 vs 4.55 and the visitors’ higher shot conversion 17% vs 11% increase the guests’ chance to score. In the last 5 matches FAS averaged 2.4 goals and had BTTS in 40% of games, whereas Cacahuatique averaged 0.8 goals and had BTTS in 60% of games, indicating mixed signals but an overall balance favoring Both Teams To Score. Considering the seasonal 59%/55%, xG in the 1.3–1.6 range and low clean sheet rates of 27% and 32%, I assess BTTS probability at 65% and No BTTS at 35%, therefore I recommend a 'yes' (BTTS - Yes) bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals as the average of the team's attacking xG and the opponent's defensive xG: FAS attacking xG 1.52 vs xG conceded by Cacahuatique 1.59 → expected 1.56 for the home side; Cacahuatique attacking xG 1.30 vs xG conceded by FAS 1.48 → 1.39 for the away side, total 2.95. A total of 2.95 in the Poisson model corresponds to roughly a 79% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about 57% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5), while only around 34% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal rates support this picture: hosts have 77% of matches Over 1.5, visitors 73%, and for the 2.5 line it's 55% and 59% respectively. Additionally, FAS scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches (2.4 per match) versus the visitors' 4 goals (0.8 per match), and the both teams to score percentages are 59% and 55% — this further boosts the probability of at least two goals. Therefore the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5 (side: Over, line: 1.5).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis indicates the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an away win (X/2). Averaging both teams’ perspectives yields estimated HT probabilities: home leading ~16% (leadingAtHT_home 18% vs trailingAtHT_away 14%), draw ~46% (drawingAtHT_home 55% and drawingAtHT_away 36%), and away leading ~38% (leadingAtHT_away 50% vs trailingAtHT_home 27%). For FT, the away side appears favored — they have a seasonal win rate of 45% and average 1.55 points per match, whereas the home side wins at home only 14% and averages 0.77 points per match. In the first half the away team scores on average 0.82 goals versus the home team’s 0.55 and concedes only 0.23 goals by HT, while converting chances more efficiently (shot conversion 17% vs 11%), which increases the likelihood of a turnaround after the break. Combining the averaged HT distribution (16/46/38) with the estimated FT distribution (approximately 25% home win, 27% draw, 48% away win) yields the highest share for X/2 (~22%), therefore X/2 is the recommended HT/FT pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FAS | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FAS is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - FAS · 1 pts / match - Cacahuatique
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 83% better for: goals scored per match.
2.2 goals / match - FAS · 1.2 goals / match - Cacahuatique
FAS is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - FAS · 1.36 goals / match - Cacahuatique
FAS scores in 89% of matches (39 of 44 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 30% (13 of 44 matches).
Cacahuatique scores in 75% of matches (33 of 44 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 36% (16 of 44 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FAS
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAS is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.68 pts / match - FAS · 1.48 pts / match - Cacahuatique
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FAS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (29 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +19 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FAS
Cacahuatique
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| FAS | Liga | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.20 | 2.69 | ▼ 2.57 |
| Both teams scored | • 55% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 51% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 28% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 67% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 79% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FASGoalNelson Wilfredo Bonilla Sánchez
- FASGoalDustin Clifman Corea Garay
- FASGoalRafael Tejada
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): FAS 3 - 1 - 1 Cacahuatique. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of FAS vs Cacahuatique?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 3:0 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Cacahuatique?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches FAS won 3, Cacahuatique won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Cacahuatique?
FAS score 2.20 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.20. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FAS's matches and 57% of Cacahuatique's.
What form are FAS and Cacahuatique in?
Over the last 5 games FAS have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Cacahuatique 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Cacahuatique?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FAS vs Cacahuatique: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


