El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 18 September 2026

FAS vs Cacahuatique: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique

FAS vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FAS played Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

FAS: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Cacahuatique: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

FAS scores 2.20 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Cacahuatique scores 1.20 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FAS 55%, Cacahuatique 57%. Over 2.5: FAS 57%, Cacahuatique 57%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.41. FAS: 10.9 shots per match, Cacahuatique: 8.8.

Match halves

FAS: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.23. Cacahuatique: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

FAS: 76-90+ (29 goals). Cacahuatique: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FAS is the clear favorite: at home they average 2.33 goals per match and win 81% of home fixtures, while Cacahuatique average 1.36 goals away and win 45% of their road games. The hosts create more and better chances – 12.33 average shots and 5.52 shots on target per match versus 8.23 shots and 4.55 on target for the visitors, and their home xG is 1.58 compared to the visitors’ 1.30 xG, which combined with conversion rates of 19% vs 17% results in a higher goal output. Defensively FAS also looks more reliable: they concede only 0.76 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 43% of games, whereas Cacahuatique concedes 1.18 goals on average away and have 32% clean sheets. Recent form confirms the home advantage — in the last five matches FAS scored 12 goals and average 2 points per game, while Cacahuatique managed only 4 goals and average 1 point per game. Based on this I tip a home win, estimating their chance at about 74%, a draw at 14% and an away win at 12%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have season BTTS rates of 59% (FAS) and 55% (Cacahuatique), averaging 57% and exceeding the league mean of 54%. xG figures show FAS produces 1.52 xG while conceding 1.59, and Cacahuatique produces 1.30 xG while conceding 1.48 — both sides generate roughly 1.3–1.6 xG per game. Additionally, FAS concedes on average 1.55 goals at home, while Cacahuatique scores on average 1.36 goals; shots on target stats 4.05 vs 4.55 and the visitors’ higher shot conversion 17% vs 11% increase the guests’ chance to score. In the last 5 matches FAS averaged 2.4 goals and had BTTS in 40% of games, whereas Cacahuatique averaged 0.8 goals and had BTTS in 60% of games, indicating mixed signals but an overall balance favoring Both Teams To Score. Considering the seasonal 59%/55%, xG in the 1.3–1.6 range and low clean sheet rates of 27% and 32%, I assess BTTS probability at 65% and No BTTS at 35%, therefore I recommend a 'yes' (BTTS - Yes) bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I calculated expected goals as the average of the team's attacking xG and the opponent's defensive xG: FAS attacking xG 1.52 vs xG conceded by Cacahuatique 1.59 → expected 1.56 for the home side; Cacahuatique attacking xG 1.30 vs xG conceded by FAS 1.48 → 1.39 for the away side, total 2.95. A total of 2.95 in the Poisson model corresponds to roughly a 79% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about 57% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5), while only around 34% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal rates support this picture: hosts have 77% of matches Over 1.5, visitors 73%, and for the 2.5 line it's 55% and 59% respectively. Additionally, FAS scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches (2.4 per match) versus the visitors' 4 goals (0.8 per match), and the both teams to score percentages are 59% and 55% — this further boosts the probability of at least two goals. Therefore the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5 (side: Over, line: 1.5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis indicates the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an away win (X/2). Averaging both teams’ perspectives yields estimated HT probabilities: home leading ~16% (leadingAtHT_home 18% vs trailingAtHT_away 14%), draw ~46% (drawingAtHT_home 55% and drawingAtHT_away 36%), and away leading ~38% (leadingAtHT_away 50% vs trailingAtHT_home 27%). For FT, the away side appears favored — they have a seasonal win rate of 45% and average 1.55 points per match, whereas the home side wins at home only 14% and averages 0.77 points per match. In the first half the away team scores on average 0.82 goals versus the home team’s 0.55 and concedes only 0.23 goals by HT, while converting chances more efficiently (shot conversion 17% vs 11%), which increases the likelihood of a turnaround after the break. Combining the averaged HT distribution (16/46/38) with the estimated FT distribution (approximately 25% home win, 27% draw, 48% away win) yields the highest share for X/2 (~22%), therefore X/2 is the recommended HT/FT pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
FASCacahuatique
14Shots1
FASCacahuatique
8Shots on target0
FASCacahuatique
1.83xG0.36
FASCacahuatique
4Corners5
FASCacahuatique
54Dangerous attacks39
FASCacahuatique
-1Fouls-1
FASCacahuatique
-1Cards-1
FASCacahuatique

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.2Goals scored / match1.2
FASCacahuatique
1Goals conceded / match1.36
FASCacahuatique
53%Average possession48%
FASCacahuatique
5.14Shots on target / match4.18
FASCacahuatique

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.91Shots per match8.77
FASCacahuatique
5.14Shots on target4.18
FASCacahuatique
20.2%Shot conversion13.7%
FASCacahuatique
53%Possession48%
FASCacahuatique
1.53xG for1.41
FASCacahuatique
1.19xG against1.54
FASCacahuatique

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingCacahuatique: Efficient finishing
FASCacahuatique
Accuracy (shots on target)47%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FAS is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - FAS · 1 pts / match - Cacahuatique

FAS
LWWWD
Season result split
64% W23% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
28-10-6
2.14 pts / match · goal difference +53
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
17-2-2
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Cacahuatique
WLDDL
Season result split
30% W27% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-12-19
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
10-4-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 83% better for: goals scored per match.

2.2 goals / match - FAS · 1.2 goals / match - Cacahuatique

FAS is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - FAS · 1.36 goals / match - Cacahuatique

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 89% of matches (39 of 44 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 30% (13 of 44 matches).

Cacahuatique scoring profile: strong

Cacahuatique scores in 75% of matches (33 of 44 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 36% (16 of 44 matches).

97Goals scored (season)53
FASCacahuatique
44Goals conceded (season)60
FASCacahuatique
3.2Average goals in match2.57
FASCacahuatique
12Goals scored (last 5)4
FASCacahuatique
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
FASCacahuatique

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal75%
FASCacahuatique
66%2 goals25%
FASCacahuatique
39%3 goals11%
FASCacahuatique
14%4 goals5%
FASCacahuatique

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal70%
FASCacahuatique
27%2 goals41%
FASCacahuatique
9%3 goals18%
FASCacahuatique
0%4 goals5%
FASCacahuatique

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time14%
FASCacahuatique
7%BTTS in both halves0%
FASCacahuatique
50%Scored in both halves11%
FASCacahuatique

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
FASCacahuatique
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
FASCacahuatique
40%BTTS - last 560%
FASCacahuatique

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
FASCacahuatique
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
FASCacahuatique
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
FASCacahuatique

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
FASCacahuatique
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
FASCacahuatique
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
FASCacahuatique

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.68 pts / match - FAS · 1.48 pts / match - Cacahuatique

FAS - half-time state
43% leading39% draw18% trailing
Cacahuatique - half-time state
34% leading45% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.68Points per match (1st half)1.48
FASCacahuatique
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.68
FASCacahuatique
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
FASCacahuatique
1.41Average goals (1st half)1.11
FASCacahuatique
64%Clean sheet before half-time70%
FASCacahuatique
39%No goal before half-time52%
FASCacahuatique

After half-time (2nd half)

1.89Points per match (2nd half)1.07
FASCacahuatique
1.23Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
FASCacahuatique
0.52Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
FASCacahuatique
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.45
FASCacahuatique
59%Clean sheet after half-time41%
FASCacahuatique
25%No goal after half-time61%
FASCacahuatique

FAS - second-half results

52% W32% D16% L
74
Half-time points
42
Half-time goals
+22
Goal difference (1st half)
83
Second-half points
+31
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cacahuatique - second-half results

27% W25% D48% L
65
Half-time points
30
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.40
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FAS
ScoredConceded
13
4
0-15
16
4
16-30
14
13
31-45
9
9
46-60
16
4
61-75
29
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (29 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +19 - wins late phases.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
11
7
0-15
11
5
16-30
8
7
31-45
5
12
46-60
6
15
61-75
12
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaCacahuatique
Average goals in match 3.202.69 2.57
Both teams scored 55%54% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%51% 57%
Clean sheets 36%28% 30%
Goal before half-time 77%67% 64%
Goal after half-time 86%79% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Dustin Clifman Corea Garay⚽ 1
Nelson Wilfredo Bonilla Sánchez⚽ 1
Rafael Tejada⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FASGoalNelson Wilfredo Bonilla Sánchez
  2. FASGoalDustin Clifman Corea Garay
  3. FASGoalRafael Tejada

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Filiberto MartinezMatches officiated: 12
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 242%Home wins33%Draws25%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): FAS 3 - 1 - 1 Cacahuatique. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Cacahuatique
0 : 1
FAS
FAS
0 : 1
Cacahuatique
Cacahuatique
2 : 3
FAS
FAS
2 : 1
Cacahuatique
Cacahuatique
0 : 0
FAS

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs Cacahuatique?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 3:0 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Cacahuatique?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches FAS won 3, Cacahuatique won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Cacahuatique?

FAS score 2.20 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.20. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FAS's matches and 57% of Cacahuatique's.

What form are FAS and Cacahuatique in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Cacahuatique 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Cacahuatique?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FAS vs Cacahuatique: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.