El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónEstadio Óscar Alberto QuiteñoData current as of 22 October 2026

FAS vs Firpo: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
3 : 1half-time 3:0
Firpo crest
Firpo

FAS vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FAS played Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Óscar Alberto Quiteño. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

FAS: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Firpo: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

FAS scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Firpo scores 1.60 and concedes 0.20. League average: 2.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FAS 50%, Firpo 20%. Over 2.5: FAS 50%, Firpo 20%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.75. FAS: 12.3 shots per match, Firpo: 12.0.

Match halves

FAS: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.17. Firpo: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

FAS: 76-90+ (5 goals). Firpo: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-2. Average goals 3.25, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FAS are unbeaten at home, winning 67% of their matches and averaging 1.67 goals scored against just 0.67 conceded per game. The hosts also create higher-quality chances: their average xG stands at 1.81, compared with Firpo’s 1.59, while they register 13.67 shots per match versus 11 for their opponents. Firpo are in excellent overall form, with 4 wins and a draw in their last five matches and no goals conceded during that run, but they have drawn both of their away fixtures so far. The visitors score just 0.5 goals per game away from home and have failed to score in 50% of such matches, significantly limiting their chances against FAS’s solid defence. Home advantage and the hosts’ greater attacking consistency point to a narrow FAS victory, although Firpo’s strong resistance to defeat increases the likelihood of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as FAS keep a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches and have yet to concede a goal there. Firpo average just 0.50 goals scored away from home, have failed to score in 50% of such appearances, and their shot conversion rate is only 5%, compared with FAS’s 18%. The hosts are clearly more dangerous in front of goal, averaging 8.33 shots on target and 2.33 goals per match, so the most likely scenario is one in which they provide the goals. Firpo’s last five matches have produced an average of 1.60 goals scored and an xG of 1.63, but the team have not conceded a single goal during that period, further supporting a one-sided outcome. The seasonal BTTS rate in the league is only 44%, and the combination of FAS’s strong defence and Firpo’s low away goal production suggests that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

FAS averages 2.33 goals at home, but Firpo concedes only 0.50 goals per away match and has kept a clean sheet in each of its last five games. The hosts boast a solid xG of 1.86, but Firpo’s defensive profile is confirmed by an xG conceded of 1.16 and clean sheets in 50% of matches. Only 33% of FAS matches and none of Firpo’s matches went over 2.5 goals, while both teams have recorded 100% of matches under 3.5. The expected total of 2.17 goals points to a scoreline in the 1–3 goal range, making Under 3.5 the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

FAS have won all of their matches at home so far, scoring an average of 2.33 goals and conceding none, while Firpo have drawn every away fixture, scoring just 0.50 goals on average. The hosts led at the break in all 3 of their home matches, scoring an average of 1.33 goals before half-time, whereas Firpo have failed to score in the first half in any of their away games and went into the interval level on both occasions. FAS also hold the edge in chance creation, recording 8.33 shots on target per match compared with Firpo’s 5.50, as well as an 18% finishing rate versus 5%. Although Firpo’s recent form is strong, with 4 wins and 1 draw in their last five matches, FAS have the more favourable home profile and should take the lead before half-time. After the break, FAS have continued to keep a clean sheet in every home match and score an average of 1.00 goal, making the most likely outcome an HT/FT 1/1: the hosts to lead at the break and win after the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
FASFirpo
13Shots16
FASFirpo
7Shots on target10
FASFirpo
1.83xG2.43
FASFirpo
9Corners12
FASFirpo
72Dangerous attacks100
FASFirpo
9Fouls7
FASFirpo
0Cards0
FASFirpo

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.67Goals scored / match1.6
FASFirpo
1Goals conceded / match0.2
FASFirpo
57%Average possession53%
FASFirpo
8.5Shots on target / match7.2
FASFirpo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.33Shots per match12
FASFirpo
8.5Shots on target7.2
FASFirpo
13.5%Shot conversion13.3%
FASFirpo
57%Possession53%
FASFirpo
1.84xG for1.75
FASFirpo
1.37xG against1.05
FASFirpo

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingFirpo: Efficient finishing
FASFirpo
Accuracy (shots on target)69%60%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Firpo is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - FAS · 2.2 pts / match - Firpo

FAS
LWDLW
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Firpo
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
60% W40% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 400% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - FAS · 0.2 goals / match - Firpo

FAS scoring profile: mixed

FAS scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 80% (4 of 5 matches).

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

10Goals scored (season)8
FASFirpo
6Goals conceded (season)1
FASFirpo
2.67Average goals in match1.8
FASFirpo
7Goals scored (last 5)8
FASFirpo
5Goals conceded (last 5)1
FASFirpo

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal80%
FASFirpo
33%2 goals40%
FASFirpo
33%3 goals20%
FASFirpo
17%4 goals20%
FASFirpo

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal20%
FASFirpo
33%2 goals0%
FASFirpo
0%3 goals0%
FASFirpo
0%4 goals0%
FASFirpo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time0%
FASFirpo
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FASFirpo
17%Scored in both halves40%
FASFirpo

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
FASFirpo
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
FASFirpo
40%BTTS - last 520%
FASFirpo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
FASFirpo
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
FASFirpo
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
FASFirpo

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
FASFirpo
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
FASFirpo
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
FASFirpo

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - FAS · 2.2 pts / match - Firpo

FAS - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Firpo - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)2.2
FASFirpo
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.8
FASFirpo
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0
FASFirpo
1.17Average goals (1st half)0.8
FASFirpo
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
FASFirpo
67%No goal before half-time40%
FASFirpo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per match (2nd half)1.8
FASFirpo
1.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
FASFirpo
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
FASFirpo
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1
FASFirpo
83%Clean sheet after half-time80%
FASFirpo
33%No goal after half-time40%
FASFirpo

FAS - second-half results

50% W33% D17% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Firpo - second-half results

40% W60% D0% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FAS
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.85
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
13%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaFirpo
Average goals in match▲ 2.672.55▼ 1.80
Both teams scored▲ 50%48%▼ 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%43%▼ 20%
Clean sheets• 33%34%▲ 80%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%57%▲ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%70%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+50%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Edgar José Medrano Ayarza⚽ 2
—Yan Dos Santos Maciel⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Víctor Vladimir García Campos⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FASGoalYan Dos Santos Maciel
  2. FASGoalEdgar José Medrano Ayarza
  3. FASGoalEdgar José Medrano Ayarza
  4. FirpoGoalVíctor Vladimir García Campos

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): FAS 1 - 1 - 2 Firpo. Average goals 3.25, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Firpo
1 : 1
FAS
FAS
2 : 0
Firpo
Firpo
3 : 1
FAS
FAS
2 : 3
Firpo

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs Firpo?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 3:1 Firpo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Firpo?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches FAS won 1, Firpo won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Firpo?

FAS score 1.67 goals per game on average and Firpo 1.60. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 50% of FAS's matches and 20% of Firpo's.

What form are FAS and Firpo in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Firpo 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Firpo?

The statistical background for FAS vs Firpo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.