El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 07 September 2026

Firpo vs CD Platense: match statistics

Firpo crest
Firpo
3 : 1half-time 1:0
CD Platense crest
CD Platense
165%(1.53)
X22%(3.85)
213%(5.60)

Firpo displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 61% of their matches at home with only 11% losses. The hosts have scored as many as 67 goals this season, conceding only 31, resulting in an impressive +16 goal difference at their home ground. CD Platense performs very poorly away from home with only 20% wins and 47% losses, conceding an average of 1.67 goals per match. The recent form from the last five matches also favors Firpo (2.2 points per match compared to 0.8 for the visitors). Additionally, the hosts have significantly better xG metrics (1.97 vs 1.08) and ball possession (54% vs 45%), which confirms their qualitative advantage. All key parameters point to a confident victory for Firpo in front of their home crowd.

Firpo vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Firpo played CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 15 February 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Firpo: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. CD Platense: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Firpo scores 2.12 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. CD Platense scores 1.20 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Firpo 58%, CD Platense 57%. Over 2.5: Firpo 58%, CD Platense 47%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.22. Firpo: 11.4 shots per match, CD Platense: 8.3.

Match halves

Firpo: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.39. CD Platense: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Firpo: 61-75 (20 goals). CD Platense: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Firpo displays significantly better form and home statistics, winning 61% of their matches at home with only 11% losses. The hosts have scored as many as 67 goals this season, conceding only 31, resulting in an impressive +16 goal difference at their home ground. CD Platense performs very poorly away from home with only 20% wins and 47% losses, conceding an average of 1.67 goals per match. The recent form from the last five matches also favors Firpo (2.2 points per match compared to 0.8 for the visitors). Additionally, the hosts have significantly better xG metrics (1.97 vs 1.08) and ball possession (54% vs 45%), which confirms their qualitative advantage. All key parameters point to a confident victory for Firpo in front of their home crowd.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
FirpoCD Platense
9Shots8
FirpoCD Platense
3Shots on target2
FirpoCD Platense
1.49xG1.26
FirpoCD Platense
1Corners5
FirpoCD Platense
96Dangerous attacks83
FirpoCD Platense
17Fouls7
FirpoCD Platense
0Cards0
FirpoCD Platense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.12Goals scored / match1.2
FirpoCD Platense
1.03Goals conceded / match1.5
FirpoCD Platense
52%Average possession47%
FirpoCD Platense
5.55Shots on target / match3.57
FirpoCD Platense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.45Shots per match8.27
FirpoCD Platense
5.55Shots on target3.57
FirpoCD Platense
18.5%Shot conversion14.5%
FirpoCD Platense
52%Possession47%
FirpoCD Platense
1.8xG for1.22
FirpoCD Platense
1.2xG against1.36
FirpoCD Platense

Shooting quality

Firpo: Efficient finishingCD Platense: Counter-attacking
FirpoCD Platense
Accuracy (shots on target)48%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Firpo is 175% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Firpo · 0.8 pts / match - CD Platense

Firpo
DWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W24% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
22-8-3
2.24 pts / match · goal difference +36
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-5-2
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.01Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
CD Platense
WLLDL
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-12-12
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 77% better for: goals scored per match.

2.12 goals / match - Firpo · 1.2 goals / match - CD Platense

Firpo is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Firpo · 1.5 goals / match - CD Platense

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 85% of matches (28 of 33 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).

70Goals scored (season)36
FirpoCD Platense
34Goals conceded (season)45
FirpoCD Platense
3.15Average goals in match2.7
FirpoCD Platense
8Goals scored (last 5)4
FirpoCD Platense
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
FirpoCD Platense

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal63%
FirpoCD Platense
64%2 goals33%
FirpoCD Platense
48%3 goals20%
FirpoCD Platense
9%4 goals3%
FirpoCD Platense

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal80%
FirpoCD Platense
24%2 goals37%
FirpoCD Platense
9%3 goals17%
FirpoCD Platense
3%4 goals10%
FirpoCD Platense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time20%
FirpoCD Platense
9%BTTS in both halves7%
FirpoCD Platense
45%Scored in both halves13%
FirpoCD Platense

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
FirpoCD Platense
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
FirpoCD Platense
60%BTTS - last 540%
FirpoCD Platense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
FirpoCD Platense
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
FirpoCD Platense
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
FirpoCD Platense

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
FirpoCD Platense
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FirpoCD Platense
39%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
FirpoCD Platense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / match - Firpo · 1.1 pts / match - CD Platense

Firpo - half-time state
36% leading45% draw18% trailing
CD Platense - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per match (1st half)1.1
FirpoCD Platense
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.57
FirpoCD Platense
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
FirpoCD Platense
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.2
FirpoCD Platense
67%Clean sheet before half-time50%
FirpoCD Platense
48%No goal before half-time63%
FirpoCD Platense

After half-time (2nd half)

2.36Points per match (2nd half)0.93
FirpoCD Platense
1.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
FirpoCD Platense
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
FirpoCD Platense
1.97Average goals (2nd half)1.5
FirpoCD Platense
58%Clean sheet after half-time47%
FirpoCD Platense
21%No goal after half-time60%
FirpoCD Platense

Firpo - second-half results

73% W18% R9% P
51
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
78
Second-half points
+27
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding186%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - second-half results

13% W53% R33% P
33
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.20
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
9
4
0-15
6
4
16-30
9
7
31-45
11
8
46-60
20
6
61-75
15
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (20 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
6
6
16-30
8
7
31-45
6
6
46-60
7
10
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FirpoLigaCD Platense
Average goals in match 3.152.72 2.70
Both teams scored 58%56% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%53% 47%
Clean sheets 36%27% 20%
Goal before half-time 64%68% 67%
Goal after half-time 88%77% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Brayan Balmore Landaverde Alvarez⚽ 1
Marcelo Augusto Ferreira Bordón⚽ 1
Nelson Vladimir Díaz Tobar⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Johan Carlos Bogotá Valencia⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FirpoGoalNelson Vladimir Díaz Tobar
  2. CD PlatenseGoalJohan Carlos Bogotá Valencia
  3. FirpoGoalBrayan Balmore Landaverde Alvarez

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Firpo 3 - 1 - 0 CD Platense. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Firpo
6 : 2
CD Platense
CD Platense
0 : 2
Firpo
CD Platense
1 : 3
Firpo
Firpo
0 : 0
CD Platense

FAQ

What was the result of Firpo vs CD Platense?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Firpo 3:1 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Firpo and CD Platense?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Firpo won 3, CD Platense won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Firpo vs CD Platense?

Firpo score 2.12 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.20. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Firpo's matches and 57% of CD Platense's.

What form are Firpo and CD Platense in?

Over the last 5 games Firpo have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and CD Platense 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Firpo vs CD Platense?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.