Latvia - VirsligaZemgales Olimpiskā centraData current as of 19 September 2026

FS Jelgava vs Auda: match statistics

FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Auda crest
Auda

FS Jelgava vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FS Jelgava played Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Venue: Zemgales Olimpiskā centra. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

FS Jelgava: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Auda: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

FS Jelgava scores 1.00 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. Auda scores 1.65 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FS Jelgava 44%, Auda 57%. Over 2.5: FS Jelgava 40%, Auda 52%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.30. FS Jelgava: 10.7 shots per match, Auda: 13.1.

Match halves

FS Jelgava: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.44. Auda: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

FS Jelgava: 16-30 (5 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-3. Average goals 2.83, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda enter this match as the third-placed team and have won all of their last 5 games, scoring 10 goals and conceding just 3. Jelgava sit seventh and have lost their last 5 matches with a 1:10 goal difference, clearly highlighting their problems both in front of goal and in defensive organisation. Away from home, Auda average 1.42 goals with an xG of 1.60, while Jelgava concede 1.69 goals per home match and allow opponents an xG of 1.66. The visitors also create more shots on target, averaging 4.50 compared with the hosts’ 3.54, while keeping a clean sheet in 42% of away matches. Jelgava have failed to score in 46% of their home games, whereas Auda have failed to score in just 8% of their away fixtures, making an away win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators are moderately high, standing at 55% for Jelgava and 58% for Auda, but current form clearly shifts the assessment towards at least one team failing to score. Jelgava has scored just 1 goal in its last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of its appearances during this period. Auda has conceded just 3 goals in its last five league matches, an average of 0.6 per game, and has kept a clean sheet in 42% of its season matches. At the same time, the visitors are highly effective offensively, averaging 2.0 goals across their last five matches. Therefore, the most likely outcome is Auda to score while Jelgava fails to find the net — BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals, as 73% of Jelgava’s matches and 83% of Auda’s matches have finished below this line this season. Jelgava are in very poor form: they have scored just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, with an xG of only 1.00. Auda have won their last five matches, scoring 10 goals and conceding just 3, but their solid defence also limits the prospects of a high-scoring game for the hosts; they have kept a clean sheet in 42% of their matches this season. The visitors should create more chances, as their recent xG stands at 1.71, while Jelgava have recently allowed an xG of 2.59. However, the 0.75 to 1.75 forecast still points more towards a scoreline such as 0:2, 1:1 or 1:2 than four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Auda leading at the break and securing the win after 90 minutes. Jelgava have lost all of their last five matches, scoring an average of just 0.2 goals and conceding 2.0, while Auda have won all five of their matches, averaging 2.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded. In the first halves of this run, the hosts failed to take the lead on any occasion, were behind at half-time in 100% of their matches, and did not score a single goal. By contrast, Auda led in 60% of their matches and conceded an average of just 0.2 goals before the break. Auda have also had the better defence throughout the season, allowing an average of 1.0 goal and 0.98 xG to opponents, compared with Jelgava’s 1.27 goals and 1.30 xG. The visitors’ advantage remains evident after half-time, as they have averaged 1.2 goals in the second half across their last five appearances, while the hosts have managed just 0.2, further strengthening the 2/2 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
FS JelgavaAuda
5Shots16
FS JelgavaAuda
1Shots on target4
FS JelgavaAuda
0.72xG1.74
FS JelgavaAuda
6Corners6
FS JelgavaAuda
45Dangerous attacks62
FS JelgavaAuda
21Fouls15
FS JelgavaAuda
2Cards6
FS JelgavaAuda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.65
FS JelgavaAuda
1.72Goals conceded / match1.13
FS JelgavaAuda
44%Average possession59%
FS JelgavaAuda
3.44Shots on target / match4.65
FS JelgavaAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.68Shots per match13.13
FS JelgavaAuda
3.44Shots on target4.65
FS JelgavaAuda
9.4%Shot conversion12.6%
FS JelgavaAuda
44%Possession59%
FS JelgavaAuda
1.3xG for1.63
FS JelgavaAuda
1.79xG against1.14
FS JelgavaAuda

Shooting quality

FS Jelgava: BalancedAuda: Balanced
FS JelgavaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)32%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1.6 pts / match - Auda

FS Jelgava
WLLLL
Season result split
24% W28% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-12
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-7
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 2.21BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Auda
WDLDW
Season result split
57% W17% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-6
1.87 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 65% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.65 goals / match - Auda

Auda is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.72 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.13 goals / match - Auda

FS Jelgava scoring profile: mixed

FS Jelgava scores in 56% of matches (14 of 25 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).

25Goals scored (season)38
FS JelgavaAuda
43Goals conceded (season)26
FS JelgavaAuda
2.72Average goals in match2.78
FS JelgavaAuda
3Goals scored (last 5)4
FS JelgavaAuda
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
FS JelgavaAuda

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal87%
FS JelgavaAuda
24%2 goals48%
FS JelgavaAuda
8%3 goals13%
FS JelgavaAuda
8%4 goals4%
FS JelgavaAuda

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal65%
FS JelgavaAuda
36%2 goals30%
FS JelgavaAuda
20%3 goals13%
FS JelgavaAuda
12%4 goals4%
FS JelgavaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time26%
FS JelgavaAuda
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FS JelgavaAuda
16%Scored in both halves35%
FS JelgavaAuda

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
FS JelgavaAuda
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
FS JelgavaAuda
20%BTTS - last 520%
FS JelgavaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
FS JelgavaAuda
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
FS JelgavaAuda
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
FS JelgavaAuda

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
FS JelgavaAuda
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
FS JelgavaAuda
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
FS JelgavaAuda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1.52 pts / match - Auda

FS Jelgava - half-time state
36% leading24% draw40% trailing
Auda - half-time state
39% leading35% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.52
FS JelgavaAuda
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.78
FS JelgavaAuda
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
FS JelgavaAuda
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.39
FS JelgavaAuda
48%Clean sheet before half-time57%
FS JelgavaAuda
60%No goal before half-time39%
FS JelgavaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.52
FS JelgavaAuda
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
FS JelgavaAuda
1.04Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
FS JelgavaAuda
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.39
FS JelgavaAuda
40%Clean sheet after half-time57%
FS JelgavaAuda
68%No goal after half-time39%
FS JelgavaAuda

FS Jelgava - second-half results

24% W28% D48% L
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 24%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Auda - second-half results

35% W48% D17% L
35
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
5
7
16-30
5
3
31-45
2
7
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
5
16-30
10
6
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

FS JelgavaLigaAuda
Average goals in match 2.722.95 2.78
Both teams scored 44%55% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%55% 52%
Clean sheets 16%24% 35%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 78%
Goal after half-time 80%83% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FS JelgavaYellow cardGlebs Žaleiko
  2. AudaYellow cardOskars Rubenis
  3. AudaYellow cardRalfs Kragliks
  4. AudaYellow cardMohamoud Fofana
  5. AudaSubstitutionOn: Mohamed FofanaOff: Mohamoud Fofana
  6. AudaYellow cardMohamed Fofana
  7. AudaYellow cardJayen Gerold
  8. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Emīls Kristers ŠmaukstelisOff: Glebs Žaleiko
  9. FS JelgavaYellow cardGļebs Kačanovs
  10. AudaYellow cardBrian Peña Perez-Vico

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): FS Jelgava 1 - 2 - 3 Auda. Average goals 2.83, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Auda
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
2 : 3
Auda
FS Jelgava
1 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
3 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava

FAQ

What was the result of FS Jelgava vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished FS Jelgava 0:1 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and Auda?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 1, Auda won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs Auda?

FS Jelgava score 1.00 goals per game on average and Auda 1.65. The Virsliga average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 44% of FS Jelgava's matches and 57% of Auda's.

What form are FS Jelgava and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Auda 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs Auda?

The statistical background for FS Jelgava vs Auda — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.