Harju Jalgpallikool vs Nõmme Kalju: match statistics
Harju Jalgpallikool vs Nõmme Kalju: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Harju Jalgpallikool played Nõmme Kalju in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Laagri kunstmuru. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Harju Jalgpallikool: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Nõmme Kalju: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Harju Jalgpallikool scores 1.43 and concedes 1.74 goals per match. Nõmme Kalju scores 1.87 and concedes 0.78. League average: 3.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Harju Jalgpallikool 52%, Nõmme Kalju 52%. Over 2.5: Harju Jalgpallikool 70%, Nõmme Kalju 43%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Nõmme Kalju has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.52. Harju Jalgpallikool: 12.2 shots per match, Nõmme Kalju: 15.5.
Match halves
Harju Jalgpallikool: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.65. Nõmme Kalju: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.87.
Goals by minute
Harju Jalgpallikool: 76-90+ (8 goals). Nõmme Kalju: 16-30 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Meistriliiga: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-6. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nõmme Kalju sit 2nd, while Harju Jalgpallikool are seventh, and the difference in current form is well illustrated by the visitors’ run: 5 wins in their last 5 matches with a 24:3 goal difference. During the same period, the hosts won just 2 of 5 games and conceded 7 goals, despite scoring 14. Away from home, Kalju win 64% of their matches and concede just 0.55 goals on average, keeping a clean sheet in 64% of their appearances, whereas Harju allow opponents 1.58 goals and record 2.03 against xG at home. The visitors also create slightly more high-quality chances, averaging 1.74 xG compared with Harju’s 1.58, and register 14.55 shots per match against 12.25 for the hosts. Harju are dangerous in attack at home, averaging 1.83 goals, but Kalju’s very strong defence and excellent run of form point towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Harju have recorded BTTS in 75% of their league matches, while the figure stands at 60% across their last five games, confirming a consistent combination of scoring goals and defensive concessions. The hosts average 2.25 goals and create 1.93 xG per match, while Nõmme Kalju allow opponents 1.28 xG, meaning that even a very solid away defence may not keep a clean sheet. Kalju are in excellent attacking form: they have scored 24 goals in their last five appearances, averaging 4.8, with 1.97 xG, while Harju conceded 1.4 goals over this period and allowed opponents 1.52 xG. Kalju’s season-long low BTTS rate of 27% and 64% clean sheets support the BTTS - No option, but the current efficiency of both attacks gives a slight edge to the scenario in which both teams score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Nõmme Kalju are in excellent form, scoring 24 goals in their last five matches, or 4.8 per game, while Harju averaged 2.8 goals over the same period. At the same time, the visitors’ defense remains highly solid: they concede just 0.55 goals per match this season and keep a clean sheet in 64% of games, limiting the home side’s projection to 1.16 goals. The teams’ average xG figures—1.93 for Harju and 1.74 for Kalju—indicate offensive potential but do not suggest that four goals will be exceeded regularly. Historically, 67% of Harju matches and 82% of Kalju matches have finished with under 3.5 goals, making Under 3.5 the strongest angle based on both teams’ long-term profile. The high tempo of their last five matches increases the chances of at least 3 goals, but Kalju’s defensive advantage makes a result with a maximum of three goals more likely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Nõmme Kalju are in clearly better current form: they have won all of their last five matches, scoring an average of 4.8 goals and conceding just 0.6, while Harju have lost three of their last five. The visitors were leading at the break in 80% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 3.2 goals in the first half, whereas the hosts managed just 1.0 first-half goal over the same period. Across the season, Kalju were ahead after 45 minutes in 64% of matches and conceded only 0.18 goals per game before the break, keeping a clean sheet in this phase in 82% of fixtures. The visitors’ defence remains the key argument after half-time as well, conceding an average of just 0.55 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 64% of games. Harju are an offensive threat at home, but their expected goals against figure stands at 1.46 compared with 1.28 for Kalju; therefore, the most likely scenario is a 1/1 HT/FT outcome, with the visitors leading at the break and securing the full-time victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Harju Jalgpallikool | Nõmme Kalju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nõmme Kalju is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 2.6 pts / match - Nõmme Kalju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nõmme Kalju is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.43 goals / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 1.87 goals / match - Nõmme Kalju
Nõmme Kalju is 123% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.74 goals / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 0.78 goals / match - Nõmme Kalju
Harju Jalgpallikool scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Nõmme Kalju keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).
Nõmme Kalju scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while Harju Jalgpallikool keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Harju Jalgpallikool
Over / Under - Nõmme Kalju
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nõmme Kalju is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 1.91 pts / match - Nõmme Kalju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Harju Jalgpallikool - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Nõmme Kalju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +10 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Harju Jalgpallikool
Nõmme Kalju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).
Teams vs league
| Harju Jalgpallikool | Liga | Nõmme Kalju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.17 | 3.10 | ▼ 2.65 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 58% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 65% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | • 22% | 23% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 75% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | • 87% | 88% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Harju Jalgpallikool 0 - 0 - 6 Nõmme Kalju. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Harju Jalgpallikool vs Nõmme Kalju?
The Meistriliiga match finished Harju Jalgpallikool 1:0 Nõmme Kalju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Harju Jalgpallikool and Nõmme Kalju?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Harju Jalgpallikool won 0, Nõmme Kalju won 6 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Harju Jalgpallikool vs Nõmme Kalju?
Harju Jalgpallikool score 1.43 goals per game on average and Nõmme Kalju 1.87. The Meistriliiga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Harju Jalgpallikool's matches and 52% of Nõmme Kalju's.
What form are Harju Jalgpallikool and Nõmme Kalju in?
Over the last 5 games Harju Jalgpallikool have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Nõmme Kalju 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Harju Jalgpallikool vs Nõmme Kalju?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


