Estonia - MeistriliigaLaagri kunstmuruData current as of 07 September 2026

Harju Jalgpallikool vs Tammeka: match statistics

Harju Jalgpallikool crest
Harju Jalgpallikool
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Tammeka crest
Tammeka

Harju Jalgpallikool vs Tammeka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Harju Jalgpallikool played Tammeka in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Laagri kunstmuru. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Harju Jalgpallikool: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Tammeka: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Harju Jalgpallikool scores 1.44 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. Tammeka scores 1.29 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.11 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Harju Jalgpallikool 52%, Tammeka 50%. Over 2.5: Harju Jalgpallikool 68%, Tammeka 54%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Tammeka has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.51. Harju Jalgpallikool: 12.0 shots per match, Tammeka: 13.7.

Match halves

Harju Jalgpallikool: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.68. Tammeka: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Harju Jalgpallikool: 31-45+ (8 goals). Tammeka: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Meistriliiga: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-3. Average goals 3.17, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tammeka come into this match on a run of 5 consecutive wins, scoring 8 goals and conceding just 1 during that period, while Harju have won 3 of their last 5 matches but have allowed opponents to score 7 goals. The visitors create more chances away from home, averaging 16.55 shots and 5.55 shots on target per match, compared with 11.85 and 4.38 for the hosts. Their average away xG is 1.85, clearly higher than Harju’s 1.53 at home, while Harju’s defence allows opponents an xG as high as 2.03. The hosts are more clinical on home soil, averaging 1.77 goals compared with Tammeka’s 1.18 away from home, but they also concede 1.46 goals per match. Tammeka’s very strong current trend and advantage in chance creation point to a slightly higher probability of an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal BTTS rates for both teams are moderate, standing at 50% for Harju and 45% for Tammeka, and therefore remaining below the league average of 59%. The strongest argument for a BTTS - No scenario is Tammeka’s current defensive form: they have conceded only 1 goal in their last five matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while BTTS landed in just 20% of those appearances. Harju have indeed been in a more open spell, with BTTS in 80% of their last five matches and an average of 1.8 goals scored, but their xG of 1.67 is set against Tammeka’s low recent xG conceded figure of 1.25. The visitors should create chances, as they average 1.85 xG and 5.55 shots on target per match; however, their five-match winning streak and defensive solidity increase the likelihood of Harju failing to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as at least two goals were scored in 64% of Tammeka’s matches and 50% of Harju’s, while both teams found the net in over 73% of their games. In their last 5 matches, Harju averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, resulting in 80% of games featuring at least three goals. Tammeka creates plenty of chances, averaging 16.55 shots and 5.55 shots on target per match, while its average xG stands at 1.85 compared with Harju’s 1.65 xG conceded. The hosts average 1.33 xG in attack, while the visitors’ defence allows 1.55 xG on average, so both sides should create scoring opportunities. The 2.5 line is more balanced, whereas Over 1.5 offers a clearer edge based on a projection of 2.75 goals in the match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Tammeka win, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 58% of their matches, compared with 45% for the visitors. Tammeka have not lost any of their last five matches, winning all five and conceding just 0.2 goals per game during this period. Harju average only 0.42 goals before the break, while Tammeka, despite their higher average of 0.64 goals, were level at half-time in 60% of their last five matches. After the break, Tammeka won 55% of their second-half segments and kept a clean sheet after half-time in 100% of their last five matches. The hosts hold an advantage in overall attacking efficiency, averaging 1.33 goals compared with Tammeka’s 1.82 goals conceded, but the visitors’ defensive form and winning streak point to the match being decided after the break in Tammeka’s favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
11Shots7
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
4Shots on target5
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
1.74xG1.15
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
7Corners4
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
105Dangerous attacks48
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
12Fouls13
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
2Cards2
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
1.44Goals scored / match1.29
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
1.64Goals conceded / match1.46
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
48%Average possession51%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
4Shots on target / match4.75
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.96Shots per match13.67
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
4Shots on target4.75
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
12%Shot conversion9.5%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
48%Possession51%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
1.51xG for1.59
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
1.91xG against1.58
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

Shooting quality

Harju Jalgpallikool: BalancedTammeka: Balanced
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tammeka is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 2.4 pts / match - Tammeka

Harju Jalgpallikool
LLLWW
Season result split
40% W4% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-1-14
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tammeka
WWWWL
Season result split
50% W8% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-2-10
1.58 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Harju Jalgpallikool is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

1.44 goals / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 1.29 goals / match - Tammeka

Tammeka is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.64 goals / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 1.46 goals / match - Tammeka

Harju Jalgpallikool scoring profile: strong

Harju Jalgpallikool scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Tammeka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).

Tammeka scoring profile: very strong

Tammeka scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Harju Jalgpallikool keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

36Goals scored (season)31
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
41Goals conceded (season)35
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
3.08Average goals in match2.75
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
6Goals scored (last 5)9
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal75%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
48%2 goals38%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
12%3 goals17%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
4%4 goals0%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal67%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
52%2 goals33%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
28%3 goals25%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
4%4 goals13%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
Harju Jalgpallikool - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 25 matches
59%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time33%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
4%BTTS in both halves4%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
20%Scored in both halves25%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
60%BTTS - last 540%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Harju Jalgpallikool is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.28 pts / match - Harju Jalgpallikool · 1 pts / match - Tammeka

Harju Jalgpallikool - half-time state
28% leading44% draw28% trailing
Tammeka - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
0.72Goals conceded (1st half)1.04
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
1.48Average goals (1st half)1.58
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
48%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
48%No goal before half-time58%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.17
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
36%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka
56%No goal after half-time42%
Harju JalgpallikoolTammeka

Harju Jalgpallikool - second-half results

24% W28% R48% P
32
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tammeka - second-half results

46% W38% R17% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Harju Jalgpallikool - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tammeka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Harju Jalgpallikool
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
5
6
16-30
8
9
31-45
4
6
46-60
5
9
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Tammeka
ScoredConceded
0
5
0-15
6
10
16-30
7
10
31-45
5
0
46-60
4
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Harju Jalgpallikool

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Tammeka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).

Teams vs league

Harju JalgpallikoolLigaTammeka
Average goals in match 3.083.11 2.75
Both teams scored 52%59% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%65% 54%
Clean sheets 24%22% 33%
Goal before half-time 76%75% 67%
Goal after half-time 88%89% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.11
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Harju JalgpallikoolYellow cardMarkus Kesa
  2. TammekaYellow cardTanel Lang
  3. TammekaYellow cardJoachim Amijekori
  4. Harju JalgpallikoolSubstitutionOn: Hugo PalutajaOff: Yann Emmanuel Assale
  5. TammekaSubstitutionOn: Karl KiidronOff: Reio Laabus
  6. TammekaSubstitutionOn: Mait VainoOff: Romet Silov
  7. Harju JalgpallikoolSubstitutionOn: Karl-Erik EnnusteOff: Karel Eerme
  8. Harju JalgpallikoolYellow cardKarl-Erik Ennuste
  9. TammekaSubstitutionOn: Marius VisterOff: Herman Pedmanson
  10. Harju JalgpallikoolSubstitutionOn: Ander-Joosep KoseOff: Daniil Rudenko

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Harju Jalgpallikool 2 - 1 - 3 Tammeka. Average goals 3.17, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Tammeka
2 : 1
Harju Jalgpallikool
Harju Jalgpallikool
1 : 0
Tammeka
Harju Jalgpallikool
2 : 2
JK Tammeka Tartu
JK Tammeka Tartu
3 : 0
Harju Jalgpallikool
JK Tammeka Tartu
2 : 1
Harju Jalgpallikool
Harju Jalgpallikool
4 : 1
JK Tammeka Tartu

FAQ

What was the result of Harju Jalgpallikool vs Tammeka?

The Meistriliiga match finished Harju Jalgpallikool 0:2 Tammeka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Harju Jalgpallikool and Tammeka?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Harju Jalgpallikool won 2, Tammeka won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Harju Jalgpallikool vs Tammeka?

Harju Jalgpallikool score 1.44 goals per game on average and Tammeka 1.29. The Meistriliiga average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Harju Jalgpallikool's matches and 50% of Tammeka's.

What form are Harju Jalgpallikool and Tammeka in?

Over the last 5 games Harju Jalgpallikool have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Tammeka 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Harju Jalgpallikool vs Tammeka?

The statistical background for Harju Jalgpallikool vs Tammeka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.