Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 12 September 2026

Ilves vs Jaro: match statistics

Ilves crest
Ilves
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Jaro crest
Jaro

Ilves vs Jaro: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilves played Jaro in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 8 September 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Ilves: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Jaro: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilves scores 1.55 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. Jaro scores 0.82 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilves 59%, Jaro 45%. Over 2.5: Ilves 64%, Jaro 55%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Jaro has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.39. Ilves: 11.4 shots per match, Jaro: 11.9.

Match halves

Ilves: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.68. Jaro: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.23.

Goals by minute

Ilves: 16-30 (7 goals). Jaro: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ilves have a clear home advantage: they win 55% of their matches on home soil, score an average of 1.55 goals and concede just 1.00, while Jaro have failed to win any away match. The visitors have lost all of their last 5 games, scoring just 1 goal and conceding 11, which confirms their very poor current form. Jaro score an average of only 0.36 goals away from home, fail to find the net in 73% of matches and lose 82% of their away fixtures. Ilves have also been unimpressive in their recent run, with 1 win in 5 matches, but their 1.27 xG at home and 55% clean-sheet rate should be enough against a team with a 3% away shot-conversion rate. A controlled home win is the most likely outcome, potentially with a clean sheet.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Jaro’s very low scoring efficiency: the visitors average just 0.36 goals per match, and have scored only 1 goal across their last 5 games, or 0.2 per match. Jaro have failed to score in 73% of their matches this season, while their BTTS rate is only 27%, clearly below Ilves’ 64% and the league average of 49%. The visitors’ attacking form remains particularly poor, as they have lost their last five matches, although their xG of 1.42 over that period suggests some potential for isolated chances. Ilves concede an average of 1.45 goals, but Jaro convert shots into goals at just a 3% rate, compared with 11% for the hosts. The more likely scenario is therefore that Ilves exploit the opponents’ weak defence, which concedes 2.55 goals per match, while Jaro once again fail to get on the scoresheet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Ilves should create better scoring chances, as Jaro concede an average of 2.55 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in only 9% of games. The hosts average 5.0 shots on target per match, compared with 3.18 for Jaro, while their shot conversion rate stands at 11%, against just 3% for the visitors. At the same time, Jaro’s attack is highly limited: the team scores 0.36 goals per match this season and have scored only 1 goal in their last five appearances. In their last five matches, both teams produced Over 2.5 goals in only 40% of cases, while 73% of their matches this season ended with Under 3.5 goals. Ilves’ advantage could lead to a result around 2:0 or 2:1, but Jaro’s poor scoring output limits the likelihood of four goals, making Under 3.5 goals the best choice.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ilves held the lead at the break in 45% of matches, while Jaro were trailing at half-time in 55%, clearly supporting a scenario in which the hosts establish an advantage before the interval. In the first 45 minutes, Ilves average 0.91 goals scored and 0.55 conceded, whereas Jaro score just 0.27 goals while allowing opponents 1.09. Across the season, the visitors have not won a single match, averaging only 0.36 goals per game and conceding 2.55, making a second-half turnaround unlikely. Ilves have also been less convincing recently, drawing at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches, which gives the draw/hosts HT/FT outcome a meaningful chance; however, the strongest individual signal remains an Ilves lead at half-time followed by an Ilves win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
IlvesJaro
16Shots11
IlvesJaro
6Shots on target2
IlvesJaro
1.82xG1.24
IlvesJaro
5Corners3
IlvesJaro
54Dangerous attacks56
IlvesJaro
11Fouls11
IlvesJaro
0Cards3
IlvesJaro

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.55Goals scored / match0.82
IlvesJaro
1.68Goals conceded / match2
IlvesJaro
50%Average possession46%
IlvesJaro
4.5Shots on target / match4.09
IlvesJaro

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.36Shots per match11.95
IlvesJaro
4.5Shots on target4.09
IlvesJaro
13.6%Shot conversion6.8%
IlvesJaro
50%Possession46%
IlvesJaro
1.39xG for1.4
IlvesJaro
1.66xG against1.69
IlvesJaro

Shooting quality

Ilves: Efficient finishingJaro: Balanced
IlvesJaro
Accuracy (shots on target)40%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ilves
LWLLL
Season result split
32% W18% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-11
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Jaro
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
14% W27% D59% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-13
0.68 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-9
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 89% better for: goals scored per match.

1.55 goals / match - Ilves · 0.82 goals / match - Jaro

Ilves is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.68 goals / match - Ilves · 2 goals / match - Jaro

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).

Jaro scoring profile: mixed

Jaro scores in 50% of matches (11 of 22 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).

34Goals scored (season)18
IlvesJaro
37Goals conceded (season)44
IlvesJaro
3.23Average goals in match2.82
IlvesJaro
5Goals scored (last 5)1
IlvesJaro
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
IlvesJaro

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal50%
IlvesJaro
45%2 goals27%
IlvesJaro
14%3 goals5%
IlvesJaro
5%4 goals0%
IlvesJaro

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal86%
IlvesJaro
55%2 goals55%
IlvesJaro
27%3 goals32%
IlvesJaro
9%4 goals14%
IlvesJaro

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time18%
IlvesJaro
9%BTTS in both halves5%
IlvesJaro
27%Scored in both halves14%
IlvesJaro

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
IlvesJaro
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
IlvesJaro
40%BTTS - last 520%
IlvesJaro

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
IlvesJaro
55%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
IlvesJaro
32%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
IlvesJaro

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
IlvesJaro
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
IlvesJaro
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
IlvesJaro

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Ilves · 1.23 pts / match - Jaro

Ilves - half-time state
36% leading32% draw32% trailing
Jaro - half-time state
32% leading27% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.23
IlvesJaro
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.59
IlvesJaro
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
IlvesJaro
1.86Average goals (1st half)1.41
IlvesJaro
50%Clean sheet before half-time45%
IlvesJaro
41%No goal before half-time59%
IlvesJaro

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)0.55
IlvesJaro
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.23
IlvesJaro
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
IlvesJaro
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.41
IlvesJaro
50%Clean sheet after half-time27%
IlvesJaro
45%No goal after half-time77%
IlvesJaro

Ilves - second-half results

32% W36% D32% L
31
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 32%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jaro - second-half results

9% W27% D64% L
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-21
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding44%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Jaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.00
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-4-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
7
10
31-45
6
6
46-60
4
3
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
4
16-30
6
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
1
9
61-75
1
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.02
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.89
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

IlvesLigaJaro
Average goals in match 3.232.58 2.82
Both teams scored 59%49% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%46% 55%
Clean sheets 27%29% 14%
Goal before half-time 82%73% 77%
Goal after half-time 82%75% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JaroYellow cardAdam Vidjeskog
  2. JaroYellow cardJim Myrevik
  3. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Yiandro RaapOff: Oskari Multala
  4. JaroSubstitutionOn: Ville VuorinenOff: Joas Vikström
  5. JaroSubstitutionOn: Valde LöfsOff: Aron Bjonbäck

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Ilves 3 - 0 - 1 Jaro. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Jaro
2 : 1
Ilves
Ilves
5 : 0
Jaro
FF Jaro
0 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
2 : 1
FF Jaro

FAQ

What was the result of Ilves vs Jaro?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Ilves 2:0 Jaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ilves and Jaro?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Ilves won 3, Jaro won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilves vs Jaro?

Ilves score 1.55 goals per game on average and Jaro 0.82. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Ilves's matches and 45% of Jaro's.

What form are Ilves and Jaro in?

Over the last 5 games Ilves have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Jaro 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilves vs Jaro?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.