El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 20 September 2026

Inter vs FAS: match statistics

Inter crest
Inter
2 : 2half-time 1:2
FAS crest
FAS

Inter vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter played FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 17 September 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Inter: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. FAS: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter scores 1.56 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. FAS scores 1.75 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter 22%, FAS 50%. Over 2.5: Inter 44%, FAS 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

FAS has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.51. Inter: 7.6 shots per match, FAS: 12.8.

Match halves

Inter: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.11. FAS: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Inter: 46-60 (5 goals). FAS: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-3. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter are in excellent current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 10 goals and averaging 2.4 points per game, while FAS have recorded 3 wins and scored 6 goals during the same period. At home, the hosts are unbeaten, winning 67% of their matches and conceding just 0.33 goals per game, whereas FAS lose as many as 50% of their away matches and concede an average of 1 goal. The visitors do create more high-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.93 compared with Inter’s 1.46, but their conversion rate is only 13%, compared with 21% for the hosts. Inter register fewer shots on target, 5.33 versus 10, but are significantly more clinical in front of goal and keep a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches. The hosts’ advantage in defence, finishing efficiency and recent results gives them a slightly greater chance of winning, although FAS’s attacking potential increases the risk of a draw or a goal for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Although Inter’s seasonal BTTS rate stands at 75%, the current trend is significantly lower: only 20% of their last 5 matches featured goals from both sides. FAS also provides no strong indication of a goal at both ends, with a seasonal BTTS rate of just 25% and 40% across their last 5 matches, while conceding an average of 0.8 goals. Inter have recently averaged 2.0 goals per match, but FAS have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their seasonal fixtures, which materially increases the likelihood that the hosts will fail to breach their defense or that the visitors will remain scoreless. The hosts have conceded only 0.8 goals per match in their five most recent outings, while FAS have scored 1.2 goals during this period. Therefore, the most likely outcome is BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Inter score an average of 2.0 goals at home, while FAS average 1.5 goals away, providing a solid foundation for exceeding two goals in the match. Both teams regularly create chances: their average xG stands at 1.82 for Inter and 1.93 for FAS, although FAS’s recent form has lowered their scoring average to 1.2 goals per match. The 1.5-goal line was covered in 75% of matches for both teams, while the 2.5-goal threshold landed in exactly 50% of their games, so the higher line does not offer the same clear advantage. Inter have scored 10 goals in their last five appearances, while FAS have conceded 4 over the same period; therefore, Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick with a projected total of 2.75 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as both teams have been level after 45 minutes in 50% of their matches, while FAS have done so in as many as 80% of their last five games. Inter have been unimpressive before the break recently, averaging just 0.4 goals scored, whereas FAS conceded only 0.2 goals per match during that period. After the interval, however, the advantage should shift to the hosts: in their last five appearances, Inter averaged 1.6 goals scored in the second half and conceded just 0.2, compared with FAS’s 0.4 goals scored and 0.6 conceded. Inter also have a clearly stronger season record, winning 75% of their matches and averaging 2.0 goals, compared with FAS’s 50% win rate and 1.5 goals per game. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by an Inter win best combines a cautious start with the hosts’ stronger finish.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
InterFAS
9Shots12
InterFAS
6Shots on target5
InterFAS
1.61xG1.67
InterFAS
8Corners2
InterFAS
85Dangerous attacks78
InterFAS
9Fouls13
InterFAS
0Cards0
InterFAS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.56Goals scored / match1.75
InterFAS
0.67Goals conceded / match0.88
InterFAS
54%Average possession56%
InterFAS
4Shots on target / match8
InterFAS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.56Shots per match12.75
InterFAS
4Shots on target8
InterFAS
20.6%Shot conversion13.7%
InterFAS
54%Possession56%
InterFAS
1.51xG for1.87
InterFAS
1.59xG against1.52
InterFAS

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingFAS: Efficient finishing
InterFAS
Accuracy (shots on target)53%63%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Inter · 2 pts / match - FAS

Inter
WWWLW
Season result split
56% W33% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
DWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
FAS
DLWWW
Season result split
63% W13% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-2
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 away
2-0-2
LWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - Inter · 1.75 goals / match - FAS

Inter is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Inter · 0.88 goals / match - FAS

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 matches).

FAS scoring profile: mixed

FAS scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 matches).

14Goals scored (season)14
InterFAS
6Goals conceded (season)7
InterFAS
2.22Average goals in match2.63
InterFAS
10Goals scored (last 5)7
InterFAS
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
InterFAS

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal88%
InterFAS
56%2 goals38%
InterFAS
22%3 goals38%
InterFAS
11%4 goals13%
InterFAS

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal63%
InterFAS
22%2 goals25%
InterFAS
11%3 goals0%
InterFAS
0%4 goals0%
InterFAS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time13%
InterFAS
0%BTTS in both halves0%
InterFAS
33%Scored in both halves13%
InterFAS

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
InterFAS
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
InterFAS
20%BTTS - last 560%
InterFAS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
InterFAS
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
InterFAS
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
InterFAS

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
InterFAS
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
InterFAS
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
InterFAS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / match - Inter · 1.25 pts / match - FAS

Inter - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing
FAS - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per match (1st half)1.25
InterFAS
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.75
InterFAS
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
InterFAS
1Average goals (1st half)1.25
InterFAS
78%Clean sheet before half-time63%
InterFAS
56%No goal before half-time63%
InterFAS

After half-time (2nd half)

2.11Points per match (2nd half)1.75
InterFAS
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)1
InterFAS
0.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
InterFAS
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.38
InterFAS
89%Clean sheet after half-time75%
InterFAS
44%No goal after half-time38%
InterFAS

Inter - second-half results

56% W44% D0% L
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding170%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FAS - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding252%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.41.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
FAS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
5
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

FAS
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.43
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaFAS
Average goals in match 2.222.53 2.63
Both teams scored 22%47% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%45% 50%
Clean sheets 67%33% 38%
Goal before half-time 56%62% 63%
Goal after half-time 56%73% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Luis Enrique Vásquez⚽ 1
Yoserth Hernández⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Melvin Urbina⚽ 1
Yan Dos Santos Maciel⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FASGoalYan Dos Santos Maciel
  2. FASGoalMelvin Urbina
  3. InterGoalLuis Enrique Vásquez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Inter 0 - 1 - 3 FAS. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Inter
2 : 2
FAS
FAS
3 : 1
Inter
Inter
0 : 2
FAS
FAS
3 : 1
Inter

FAQ

What was the result of Inter vs FAS?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 2:2 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter and FAS?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Inter won 0, FAS won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs FAS?

Inter score 1.56 goals per game on average and FAS 1.75. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Inter's matches and 50% of FAS's.

What form are Inter and FAS in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and FAS 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs FAS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.