El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 04 November 2026

Inter vs Firpo: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Inter vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter play Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 7 November 2026.

Current form

Inter: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Firpo: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter scores 1.33 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Firpo scores 1.76 and concedes 0.76. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter 44%, Firpo 47%. Over 2.5: Inter 44%, Firpo 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.92 vs 1.45. Inter: 7.6 shots per match, Firpo: 12.6.

Match halves

Inter: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.94. Firpo: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Inter: 46-60 (7 goals). Firpo: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-3. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 20%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match1.76
InterFirpo
0.89Goals conceded / match0.76
InterFirpo
55%Average possession55%
InterFirpo
4.11Shots on target / match6.24
InterFirpo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.56Shots per match12.59
InterFirpo
4.11Shots on target6.24
InterFirpo
17.6%Shot conversion14%
InterFirpo
55%Possession55%
InterFirpo
1.45xG for1.92
InterFirpo
1.4xG against1.17
InterFirpo

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingFirpo: Efficient finishing
InterFirpo
Accuracy (shots on target)54%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Firpo is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Inter · 1.8 pts / match - Firpo

Inter
DDLWD
Season result split
33% W50% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-3
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-6-1
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 0.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Firpo
DWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
53% W35% D12% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-2
1.94 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Inter · 1.76 goals / match - Firpo

Firpo is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - Inter · 0.76 goals / match - Firpo

Inter scoring profile: mixed

Inter scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 53% (9 of 17 matches).

Firpo scoring profile: strong

Firpo scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 matches).

24Goals scored (season)30
InterFirpo
16Goals conceded (season)13
InterFirpo
2.22Average goals in match2.53
InterFirpo
6Goals scored (last 5)9
InterFirpo
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
InterFirpo

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal88%
InterFirpo
44%2 goals53%
InterFirpo
11%3 goals29%
InterFirpo
6%4 goals6%
InterFirpo

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal47%
InterFirpo
33%2 goals24%
InterFirpo
6%3 goals6%
InterFirpo
0%4 goals0%
InterFirpo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time18%
InterFirpo
0%BTTS in both halves12%
InterFirpo
22%Scored in both halves41%
InterFirpo

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
InterFirpo
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
InterFirpo
60%BTTS - last 580%
InterFirpo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
InterFirpo
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
InterFirpo
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
InterFirpo

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
InterFirpo
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
InterFirpo
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
InterFirpo

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - Inter · 1.76 pts / match - Firpo

Inter - half-time state
22% leading56% draw22% trailing
Firpo - half-time state
47% leading35% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)1.76
InterFirpo
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.88
InterFirpo
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
InterFirpo
0.89Average goals (1st half)1.35
InterFirpo
72%Clean sheet before half-time65%
InterFirpo
61%No goal before half-time41%
InterFirpo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.72Points per match (2nd half)1.82
InterFirpo
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
InterFirpo
0.39Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
InterFirpo
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.18
InterFirpo
67%Clean sheet after half-time71%
InterFirpo
44%No goal after half-time29%
InterFirpo

Inter - second-half results

44% W39% D17% L
22
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Firpo - second-half results

41% W59% D0% L
30
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
8
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
4
3
61-75
9
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.37
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaFirpo
Average goals in match▼ 2.222.64▼ 2.53
Both teams scored▼ 44%55%▼ 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 44%50%▼ 47%
Clean sheets▲ 50%29%▲ 53%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%66%▲ 76%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%76%▼ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Inter 0 - 2 - 3 Firpo. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 20% matches.

Firpo
3 : 0
Inter
Inter
0 : 3
Firpo
Firpo
0 : 0
Inter
Inter
1 : 1
Firpo
Firpo
2 : 0
Inter

FAQ

When do Inter and Firpo play?

Inter face Firpo on 7 November 2026 in Salvadoran Primera División. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter and Firpo?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Inter won 0, Firpo won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs Firpo?

Inter score 1.33 goals per game on average and Firpo 1.76. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Inter's matches and 47% of Firpo's.

What form are Inter and Firpo in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Firpo 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs Firpo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.