Scotland - League OneData current as of 07 September 2026

Inverness CT vs Hamilton Academical: match statistics

Inverness CT vs Hamilton Academical: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inverness CT played Hamilton Academical in League One (Scotland). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Inverness CT: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Hamilton Academical: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inverness CT scores 1.66 and concedes 0.66 goals per match. Hamilton Academical scores 1.49 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inverness CT 46%, Hamilton Academical 40%. Over 2.5: Inverness CT 37%, Hamilton Academical 57%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Inverness CT has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.29. Inverness CT: 13.3 shots per match, Hamilton Academical: 9.8.

Match halves

Inverness CT: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.91. Hamilton Academical: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Inverness CT: 61-75 (13 goals). Hamilton Academical: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win. Inverness CT has 20 wins, 11 draws and only 4 losses this season, and at home they win 71% of matches, topping the home table. The hosts have scored 58 goals this season and average 2.12 goals per home game while conceding 0.65 on average, whereas Hamilton have 52 goals this season, score 1.59 on the road and concede 1.47. Inverness generates average xG of 1.96 with 6.88 shots on target and 16.18 total shots per match, while Hamilton have xG 1.33, 4.88 shots on target and 10.35 total shots, so although the visitors have higher shot conversion (15% vs 13%) they create far fewer goal-scoring opportunities. Additionally, the hosts have not recorded a single home match without scoring (0% such games) and keep 47% clean sheets, while Hamilton fail to score in 35% of away matches and have 35% clean sheets; therefore I assess the probability of a home win at 65%, draw 20% and away win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The xG-based model gives a moderate signal for BTTS - Yes: attacking xG is 1.25 for Inverness and 1.33 for Hamilton, while xG against is 1.13 for the home side and 1.45 for the visitors; from these values expected goals come out around 1.35 (Inverness) and 1.23 (Hamilton), which via a Poisson model yields ~52% chance of BTTS. Additionally, in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred 60% of the time for the home team and 40% for the away team (average 50%), and both sides generate a high volume of shots: 9.22/10.35 overall and 4.39/4.88 on target with a conversion rate of 15%, supporting goals from both teams. The counterargument is Inverness’s high clean sheet rate of 44% and season-long BTTS only 39% (Inverness) and 41% (Hamilton), which historically reduces the frequency of both teams scoring. Weighing xG, recent form and shot metrics against seasonal clean sheets, I favor the "Yes" scenario at 56% versus 44% for "No".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Average xG is 1.25 for Inverness and 1.33 for Hamilton, with xG against 1.13 (Inverness) and 1.45 (Hamilton). Averaging the home attack vs away defense and the away attack vs home defense yields expected goals of 1.35 for Inverness and 1.23 for Hamilton, total 2.58. Seasonal shares of matches over 1.5 are 67% for Inverness and 82% for Hamilton (average 74.5%), so the 1.5 line provides the strongest signal — I estimate Over 1.5 at ~75%. A Poisson model with λ=2.58 gives P(>=3)=47.6%, hence I rate Over 2.5 as a moderate edge at ~52%, taking into account that Hamilton has 71% of matches over 2.5. Over 3.5 remains unlikely: seasonal values 22%/47% (average 34.5%) and Poisson ~26% suggest an estimated ~30% for Over 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The hosts led at the break in 8 of their matches to date (44%) and won 56% of all games, suggesting the strongest signal is a lead at the break and a win for Inverness CT. In the first half the home side average 0.67 goals scored and 0.28 conceded, while the visitors record 0.76 scored and 0.59 conceded — so the hosts’ defense is more stable before the break. In the second half the visitors produce more goals (on average 1.71 vs 1.28 for the hosts) and also concede more (0.88 vs 0.56), but the hosts earn 31 points after the break and have 50% wins in second halves versus 35% for the visitors, which increases the chances of maintaining the lead. Additionally, 72% of the hosts’ first halves are clean sheets (vs 65% for the visitors), therefore my most likely HT/FT pick is 1/1 (36%), followed by X/1 (20%) and X/X (15%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
15Shots6
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
4Shots on target3
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
1.53xG0.73
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
7Corners1
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
42Dangerous attacks20
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
9Fouls12
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
1Cards1
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Inverness CTHamilton Academical
1.66Goals scored / match1.49
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
0.66Goals conceded / match1.17
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
55%Average possession48%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
5.86Shots on target / match4.63
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.34Shots per match9.77
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
5.86Shots on target4.63
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
12.4%Shot conversion15.2%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
55%Possession48%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
1.69xG for1.29
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
0.81xG against1.29
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

Shooting quality

Inverness CT: BalancedHamilton Academical: Efficient finishing
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
Accuracy (shots on target)44%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inverness CT
DDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
57% W31% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-11-4
2.03 pts / match · goal difference +35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-4-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Hamilton Academical
LLWWW
Season result split
46% W20% R34% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-12
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inverness CT is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.66 goals / match - Inverness CT · 1.49 goals / match - Hamilton Academical

Inverness CT is 77% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.66 goals / match - Inverness CT · 1.17 goals / match - Hamilton Academical

Inverness CT scoring profile: very strong

Inverness CT scores in 91% of matches (32 of 35 matches), while Hamilton Academical keeps a clean sheet in 40% (14 of 35 matches).

Hamilton Academical scoring profile: mixed

Hamilton Academical scores in 71% of matches (25 of 35 matches), while Inverness CT keeps a clean sheet in 51% (18 of 35 matches).

58Goals scored (season)52
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
23Goals conceded (season)41
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
2.31Average goals in match2.66
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal71%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
43%2 goals43%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
23%3 goals26%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
9%4 goals9%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

How often they concede at least...

49%1 goal60%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
14%2 goals34%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
3%3 goals17%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
0%4 goals6%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
Hamilton Academical - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 35 matches
50%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time17%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
3%BTTS in both halves6%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
34%Scored in both halves37%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
60%BTTS - last 540%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
34%Min. 2 goals after half-time49%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inverness CT is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.77 pts / match - Inverness CT · 1.6 pts / match - Hamilton Academical

Inverness CT - half-time state
46% leading40% draw14% trailing
Hamilton Academical - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.77Points per match (1st half)1.6
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
0.74Goals scored (1st half)0.71
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
1.03Average goals (1st half)1.17
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
74%Clean sheet before half-time66%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
40%No goal before half-time43%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

After half-time (2nd half)

1.89Points per match (2nd half)1.54
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
0.37Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.49
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
69%Clean sheet after half-time51%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical
34%No goal after half-time49%
Inverness CTHamilton Academical

Inverness CT - second-half results

54% W26% R20% P
62
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
66
Second-half points
+19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hamilton Academical - second-half results

43% W26% R31% P
56
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inverness CT - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Hamilton Academical - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inverness CT
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
6
4
16-30
11
4
31-45
11
3
46-60
13
5
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Hamilton Academical
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
9
6
16-30
8
7
31-45
10
12
46-60
8
7
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.49
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inverness CT

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.88
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-19.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Hamilton Academical

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Inverness CTLigaHamilton Academical
Average goals in match 2.312.62 2.66
Both teams scored 46%50% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%49% 57%
Clean sheets 51%27% 40%
Goal before half-time 71%74% 74%
Goal after half-time 83%83% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inverness CTGoalDaniel DevineAssist: Paul Allan
  2. Inverness CTGoalBilly McKayAssist: Mitchell Robertson
  3. Inverness CTSubstitutionOn: Oscar MacIntyreOff: Daniel Devine
  4. Inverness CTYellow cardAlfie Bavidge
  5. Hamilton AcademicalSubstitutionOn: Gregor CrookstonOff: Ewan Simpson
  6. Inverness CTSubstitutionOn: Calum MacleodOff: Adam Mackinnon
  7. Hamilton AcademicalYellow cardAlexander Hutton
  8. Hamilton AcademicalGoalKevin O'Hara

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Inverness CT 2 - 0 - 1 Hamilton Academical. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Inverness CT vs Hamilton Academical?

The League One match finished Inverness CT 2:1 Hamilton Academical. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inverness CT and Hamilton Academical?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Inverness CT won 2, Hamilton Academical won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inverness CT vs Hamilton Academical?

Inverness CT score 1.66 goals per game on average and Hamilton Academical 1.49. The League One average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Inverness CT's matches and 40% of Hamilton Academical's.

What form are Inverness CT and Hamilton Academical in?

Over the last 5 games Inverness CT have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Hamilton Academical 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inverness CT vs Hamilton Academical?

The statistical background for Inverness CT vs Hamilton Academical — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.