Scotland - League OneData current as of 13 September 2026

Inverness CT vs Queen of the South: match statistics

165%(1.48)
X22%(4.00)
213%(5.80)

Inverness CT demonstrates a clear advantage as the league leaders with an impressive record of 18 wins and just 4 losses this season. The hosts are exceptionally effective at home, winning 73% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.27 goals per game and conceding only 0.67 goals. Queen of the South sits only in 5th place with noticeably weaker away form - just 36% of victories on the road, conceding an average of 1.43 goals and failing to score in 36% of away matches. Furthermore, the difference in offensive quality (xG 2.03 vs 1.2) and defensive quality (xG against 0.65 vs 1.28) speaks decisively in favor of the hosts. The recent form of both teams (Inverness with 1.8 PPG vs Queen of the South with 1.4 PPG) and the goal difference in home/away matches (+24 vs -1) further confirm the leader's advantage, making the home victory the most probable scenario.

Inverness CT vs Queen of the South: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inverness CT played Queen of the South in League One (Scotland). The match was played on 27 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Inverness CT: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Queen of the South: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inverness CT scores 1.73 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Queen of the South scores 1.57 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.66 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inverness CT 43%, Queen of the South 53%. Over 2.5: Inverness CT 43%, Queen of the South 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Inverness CT has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.40. Inverness CT: 13.8 shots per match, Queen of the South: 11.2.

Match halves

Inverness CT: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.93. Queen of the South: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.97.

Goals by minute

Inverness CT: 61-75 (11 goals). Queen of the South: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inverness CT demonstrates a clear advantage as the league leaders with an impressive record of 18 wins and just 4 losses this season. The hosts are exceptionally effective at home, winning 73% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.27 goals per game and conceding only 0.67 goals. Queen of the South sits only in 5th place with noticeably weaker away form - just 36% of victories on the road, conceding an average of 1.43 goals and failing to score in 36% of away matches. Furthermore, the difference in offensive quality (xG 2.03 vs 1.2) and defensive quality (xG against 0.65 vs 1.28) speaks decisively in favor of the hosts. The recent form of both teams (Inverness with 1.8 PPG vs Queen of the South with 1.4 PPG) and the goal difference in home/away matches (+24 vs -1) further confirm the leader's advantage, making the home victory the most probable scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Inverness has strong BTTS-favoring metrics: a 63% BTTS rate for the season and 80% in their last 5 matches, while generating solid offensive numbers (1.69 goals and 1.57 xG per game, 5.63 shots on target). Queen of the South also records an 80% BTTS rate in their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.6 goals with 1.53 xG, suggesting an improvement in offensive efficiency despite a weaker seasonal FTS (36%). The strongest argument against BTTS is Inverness's strong defensive form in recent matches (0.8 goals conceded and only 0.69 xG against), which could limit the visitors' scoring chances. On the other hand, Queen of the South's defense remains vulnerable (1.43 goals conceded per season and 1.6 in the last 5), so a goal from the hosts looks very likely. Overall, the seasonal data and especially the trend from the last 5 matches for both sides tilt the forecast slightly towards BTTS 'yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The goal model indicates a total of 2.79 goals (1.52 for Inverness CT and 1.27 for Queen of the South), derived from a combination of goal and xG metrics (including xG for of 1.57 vs opponent's xG against of 1.28, and 1.20 vs 1.33). Both teams very frequently surpass the 1.5 goal line in league matches: Inverness 88% and Queen of the South 93%, while simultaneously having low Under 1.5 percentages (12% and 7%). The attacking profile supports a high-scoring scenario, as the hosts generate significantly more shots and shots on target (12.75 and 5.63) than the visitors (9.36 and 4.07). Furthermore, in the last 5 matches, both sides have been scoring an average of 1.6 goals, with BTTS in this period at 80% each, which increases the chance for at least two goals. The 2.5 line is closer to 50/50 (seasonal Over 2.5: 56% vs 43%), and Under 3.5 remains more frequent (69–71%). Therefore, the strongest and most probable bet is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Inverness holds a clear edge in quality and stability: 1.75 PPG vs 1.29, a higher win percentage (50% vs 36%), and a better goal balance (1.69 scored / 1.19 conceded vs 1.36 / 1.43). Recent 5-match data strongly supports the hosts leading at the break: Inverness was ahead at HT in 60% of games and conceded only 0.2 goals on average in the first half, while Queen of the South trailed at HT in 60% and conceded 1.2 goals. Inverness's offensive strength is further confirmed by expected goals metrics (xG for 1.57 vs 1.20) and a shooting advantage (12.75 shots and 5.63 on target vs 9.36 and 4.07). In the second half, the hosts are more efficient (1.06 goals scored in 2H with 0.56 conceded), which favors maintaining or extending a lead. Queen of the South has a high loss rate (43%) and more frequently fails to score in matches (FTS 36%), therefore the 1/1 outcome is the most data-consistent scenario, while X/1 remains a plausible alternative in case of a halftime draw and a second-half turnaround.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Inverness CTQueen of the South
13Shots5
Inverness CTQueen of the South
5Shots on target2
Inverness CTQueen of the South
1.82xG0.83
Inverness CTQueen of the South
2Corners2
Inverness CTQueen of the South
91Dangerous attacks51
Inverness CTQueen of the South
7Fouls11
Inverness CTQueen of the South
2Cards3
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Inverness CTQueen of the South
1.73Goals scored / match1.57
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.67Goals conceded / match1.3
Inverness CTQueen of the South
55%Average possession52%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
5.97Shots on target / match4.9
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.77Shots per match11.17
Inverness CTQueen of the South
5.97Shots on target4.9
Inverness CTQueen of the South
12.6%Shot conversion14%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
55%Possession52%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
1.72xG for1.4
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.76xG against1.3
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Shooting quality

Inverness CT: BalancedQueen of the South: Efficient finishing
Inverness CTQueen of the South
Accuracy (shots on target)43%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inverness CT is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Inverness CT · 1.4 pts / match - Queen of the South

Inverness CT
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
60% W27% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
18-8-4
2.07 pts / match · goal difference +32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Queen of the South
LLDWW
Season result split
43% W23% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-10
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inverness CT is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.73 goals / match - Inverness CT · 1.57 goals / match - Queen of the South

Inverness CT is 94% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Inverness CT · 1.3 goals / match - Queen of the South

Inverness CT scoring profile: very strong

Inverness CT scores in 90% of matches (27 of 30 matches), while Queen of the South keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

Queen of the South scoring profile: mixed

Queen of the South scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while Inverness CT keeps a clean sheet in 53% (16 of 30 matches).

52Goals scored (season)47
Inverness CTQueen of the South
20Goals conceded (season)39
Inverness CTQueen of the South
2.4Average goals in match2.87
Inverness CTQueen of the South
8Goals scored (last 5)8
Inverness CTQueen of the South
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
Inverness CTQueen of the South

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal77%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
47%2 goals43%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
27%3 goals23%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
10%4 goals10%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal73%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
17%2 goals37%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
3%3 goals13%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0%4 goals7%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
Queen of the South - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 30 matches
50%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time13%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
37%Scored in both halves33%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
80%BTTS - last 580%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inverness CT is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / match - Inverness CT · 1.37 pts / match - Queen of the South

Inverness CT - half-time state
47% leading40% draw13% trailing
Queen of the South - half-time state
37% leading27% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per match (1st half)1.37
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Inverness CTQueen of the South
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.23
Inverness CTQueen of the South
73%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
37%No goal before half-time53%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

After half-time (2nd half)

1.87Points per match (2nd half)1.6
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.97
Inverness CTQueen of the South
0.37Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Inverness CTQueen of the South
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Inverness CTQueen of the South
70%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Inverness CTQueen of the South
37%No goal after half-time37%
Inverness CTQueen of the South

Inverness CT - second-half results

53% W27% D20% L
54
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Queen of the South - second-half results

47% W20% D33% L
41
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Inverness CT - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Queen of the South - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inverness CT
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
6
4
16-30
10
3
31-45
10
2
46-60
11
5
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Queen of the South
ScoredConceded
7
7
0-15
7
6
16-30
4
6
31-45
12
7
46-60
6
6
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inverness CT

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.96
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Queen of the South

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Inverness CTLigaQueen of the South
Average goals in match 2.402.66 2.87
Both teams scored 43%50% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%51% 53%
Clean sheets 53%28% 27%
Goal before half-time 73%76% 83%
Goal after half-time 80%81% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Queen of the SouthYellow cardTaylor Charters
  2. Inverness CTYellow cardOscar MacIntyre
  3. Queen of the SouthGoalNicholas ClarkAssist: Zander Mackenzie
  4. Inverness CTYellow cardBilly McKay
  5. Inverness CTGoalRoss Millen
  6. Inverness CTSubstitutionOn: Kieron WilloxOff: Luis Longstaff
  7. Queen of the SouthYellow cardBenjamin Lussint
  8. Queen of the SouthSubstitutionOn: Seb MasonOff: Kurtis Guthrie
  9. Queen of the SouthYellow cardReece Lyon
  10. Queen of the SouthSubstitutionOn: Liam SmithOff: Zander Mackenzie
  11. Inverness CTSubstitutionOn: David WotherspoonOff: Billy McKay

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Inverness CT 2 - 1 - 0 Queen of the South. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Inverness CT vs Queen of the South?

The League One match finished Inverness CT 1:1 Queen of the South. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inverness CT and Queen of the South?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Inverness CT won 2, Queen of the South won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inverness CT vs Queen of the South?

Inverness CT score 1.73 goals per game on average and Queen of the South 1.57. The League One average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Inverness CT's matches and 53% of Queen of the South's.

What form are Inverness CT and Queen of the South in?

Over the last 5 games Inverness CT have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Queen of the South 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inverness CT vs Queen of the South?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inverness CT vs Queen of the South: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.