Finland - VeikkausliigaJakobstads CentralplanData current as of 13 September 2026

Jaro vs SJK: match statistics

Jaro crest
Jaro
1 : 1half-time 1:0
SJK crest
SJK

Jaro vs SJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Jaro played SJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Jakobstads Centralplan. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Jaro: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. SJK: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Jaro scores 0.78 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. SJK scores 1.09 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Jaro 43%, SJK 52%. Over 2.5: Jaro 52%, SJK 52%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

SJK has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.39. Jaro: 11.9 shots per match, SJK: 13.2.

Match halves

Jaro: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.22. SJK: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Jaro: 31-45+ (6 goals). SJK: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-2. Average goals 3.25, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Jaro are coming off a very poor run of five consecutive defeats, scoring just 1 goal and conceding 11, which clearly reduces confidence in backing the hosts. Despite this, Jaro average 1.27 goals per match at home, while SJK manage only 0.82 goals away from home and fail to score in 55% of their away fixtures. The hosts also create slightly better chances, as reflected by an average xG of 1.46 compared with SJK’s 1.34, while the visitors have won only 9% of their away matches and suffered defeats in 55%. Neither defence is particularly reliable, but SJK concede 1.64 goals per away game, compared with Jaro’s 1.45 at home. Home advantage and SJK’s poor away scoring record marginally favour a Jaro bounce-back, although a draw remains a highly realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument against BTTS - Yes is not Jaro’s current lack of finishing: it has scored only 1 goal in its last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, with BTTS occurring in just 20% of those fixtures. SJK also fails to provide a highly reliable goal-scoring signal, having failed to score in 55% of its matches this season, despite averaging 1.2 goals across its last five games. Both teams have kept a clean sheet in only 18% of their season matches, which favours an opponent’s goal, but the hosts’ poor attacking run clearly limits the chances of goals at both ends. Jaro continues to create chances, recording an average xG of 1.42 over its last five league fixtures, but converted them into just one goal, while SJK conceded an average of 1.2 goals during this period. Jaro’s season-long BTTS rate stands at 64%, but its form over the last five matches, combined with SJK’s 45% BTTS rate, indicates that a scenario in which at least one team fails to score is more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Jaro are in very poor offensive form: they have scored just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, despite recording an average xG of 1.42 over that period. SJK averaged 1.2 goals in the same span, while Jaro conceded as many as 2.2 goals per match, giving the visitors a realistic chance of scoring around 1.5 goals. At the same time, both teams finished below 3.5 goals in 73% of their matches this season, and the four-goal threshold was exceeded in only 27% of their games. The combined projected total of 2.35 goals and Jaro’s limited attacking efficiency strongly support the Under 3.5 goals option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a SJK victory at full-time, as both teams very rarely establish a lead before the break: Jaro average 0.36 goals in the first half, while SJK average 0.27. SJK were level at half-time in 55% of their matches, and in the last five games neither team led after 45 minutes. Current form clearly weighs against Jaro: the hosts have lost their last five matches, scoring only 0.2 goals and conceding 2.2 on average, while SJK have averaged 1.2 goals per game. After the break, Jaro have failed to score in their last five appearances and conceded an average of 1.2 goals, whereas SJK scored 1.0 goal during that period, increasing the visitors' chances of deciding an evenly contested opening. Although Jaro have the higher seasonal xG, 1.79 compared with 1.34, their extremely poor current finishing and losing streak provide stronger support for the X/2 HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
JaroSJK
11Shots11
JaroSJK
3Shots on target3
JaroSJK
1.37xG1.41
JaroSJK
6Corners5
JaroSJK
64Dangerous attacks69
JaroSJK
12Fouls10
JaroSJK
1Cards2
JaroSJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.78Goals scored / match1.09
JaroSJK
2Goals conceded / match1.43
JaroSJK
46%Average possession52%
JaroSJK
4Shots on target / match4.57
JaroSJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.91Shots per match13.17
JaroSJK
4Shots on target4.57
JaroSJK
6.6%Shot conversion8.3%
JaroSJK
46%Possession52%
JaroSJK
1.39xG for1.54
JaroSJK
1.69xG against1.43
JaroSJK

Shooting quality

Jaro: BalancedSJK: Balanced
JaroSJK
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Jaro
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W26% D61% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-14
0.65 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
SJK
DLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W35% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-11
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJK is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

0.78 goals / match - Jaro · 1.09 goals / match - SJK

SJK is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Jaro · 1.43 goals / match - SJK

Jaro scoring profile: strong

Jaro scores in 48% of matches (11 of 23 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

SJK scoring profile: very strong

SJK scores in 61% of matches (14 of 23 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).

18Goals scored (season)25
JaroSJK
46Goals conceded (season)33
JaroSJK
2.78Average goals in match2.52
JaroSJK
1Goals scored (last 5)3
JaroSJK
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
JaroSJK

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal61%
JaroSJK
26%2 goals30%
JaroSJK
4%3 goals17%
JaroSJK
0%4 goals0%
JaroSJK

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal78%
JaroSJK
57%2 goals52%
JaroSJK
30%3 goals13%
JaroSJK
13%4 goals0%
JaroSJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time13%
JaroSJK
4%BTTS in both halves9%
JaroSJK
13%Scored in both halves22%
JaroSJK

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
JaroSJK
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
JaroSJK
20%BTTS - last 540%
JaroSJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
JaroSJK
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
JaroSJK
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
JaroSJK

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
JaroSJK
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
JaroSJK
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
JaroSJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jaro is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - Jaro · 0.91 pts / match - SJK

Jaro - half-time state
30% leading30% draw39% trailing
SJK - half-time state
17% leading39% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)0.91
JaroSJK
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.3
JaroSJK
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
JaroSJK
1.35Average goals (1st half)0.96
JaroSJK
48%Clean sheet before half-time48%
JaroSJK
61%No goal before half-time70%
JaroSJK

After half-time (2nd half)

0.52Points per match (2nd half)1.26
JaroSJK
0.22Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
JaroSJK
1.22Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
JaroSJK
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.57
JaroSJK
26%Clean sheet after half-time43%
JaroSJK
78%No goal after half-time48%
JaroSJK

Jaro - second-half results

9% W26% D65% L
28
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding43%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SJK - second-half results

30% W35% D35% L
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Jaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.00
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-7
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
4
16-30
6
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
1
10
61-75
1
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

SJK
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
1
4
16-30
4
4
31-45
5
13
46-60
4
1
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.92
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
183%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

JaroLigaSJK
Average goals in match 2.782.54 2.52
Both teams scored 43%49% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%45% 52%
Clean sheets 13%29% 22%
Goal before half-time 74%73% 70%
Goal after half-time 83%74% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JaroYellow cardGergő Bence Kocsis
  2. SJKSubstitutionOn: Elias MastokangasOff: Oskari Väistö
  3. SJKSubstitutionOn: Apostolos VelliosOff: Leon Vesterbacka
  4. SJKSubstitutionOn: Aziz CisséOff: Salim Giabo Yussif
  5. SJKYellow cardAziz Cissé
  6. SJKYellow cardFacundo Constantini

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Jaro 1 - 1 - 2 SJK. Average goals 3.25, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Jaro
2 : 1
SJK
SJK
1 : 1
Jaro
FF Jaro
0 : 4
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
3 : 1
FF Jaro

FAQ

What was the result of Jaro vs SJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Jaro 1:1 SJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Jaro and SJK?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Jaro won 1, SJK won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Jaro vs SJK?

Jaro score 0.78 goals per game on average and SJK 1.09. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Jaro's matches and 52% of SJK's.

What form are Jaro and SJK in?

Over the last 5 games Jaro have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and SJK 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jaro vs SJK?

The statistical background for Jaro vs SJK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.