Jarun vs Cibalia: match statistics
Jarun vs Cibalia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Jarun played Cibalia in Druga HNL (Croatia). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Igralište Nogometni Klub Jarun. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Jarun: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Cibalia: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Jarun scores 1.03 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Cibalia scores 1.56 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.35 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Jarun 50%, Cibalia 50%. Over 2.5: Jarun 41%, Cibalia 53%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Cibalia has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.14. Jarun: 8.8 shots per match, Cibalia: 9.6.
Match halves
Jarun: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.44. Cibalia: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.84.
Goals by minute
Jarun: 0-15 (8 goals). Cibalia: 61-75 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Druga HNL: 2.35 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cibalia is the favorite due to a higher league position (3rd vs 11th for Jarun) and significantly better form — the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals, while Jarun has 1 win and only 4 goals in their last 5. The gap in recent points dynamics is significant: Cibalia averages 2.4 points per match over the last 5 versus Jarun's 0.6, suggesting superiority in efficiency and match strength. In technical details Cibalia averages 3.86 shots on target per away match with 51% possession, while Jarun at home averages 3.33 shots on target and 48% possession; the visitors' away xG is 1.32 versus the hosts' xG of 1.27, while Jarun concedes a higher home xG (1.45), indicating greater risk of conceding goals. Jarun does have a positive home goal difference (+5) and averages 1.33 goals scored at home against 1.00 conceded, but the last 5 matches show the hosts have conceded 9 goals (1.8 per match) while Cibalia conceded 6 (1.2 per match). Taking into account the visitors' advantage in form, goals scored and recent efficiency, I forecast a Cibalia win with approximately 62% probability, a draw 20% and a Jarun win 18%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long statistics show Jarun have BTTS in 44% of home matches, while Cibalia have 60% on the road, with a league BTTS average of 44%. Seasonally Jarun score 1.94 and concede 0.75 at home, and Cibalia away score 1.2 and concede 1.33, but the last 5 matches tell a different story: Jarun conceded 9 goals in 5 matches (1.8 avg), and Cibalia scored 11 goals in 5 matches (2.2 avg). xG data corroborate both teams’ chances – average xG is 1.51 for Jarun and 1.32 for Cibalia, with xG against 1.25 and 1.35 respectively; in the last 5 matches Jarun have xG against 1.68, and Cibalia xG_for 1.31, suggesting a real ability for the visitors to score. A counter signal is Jarun’s 50% clean sheets at home, which reduces BTTS probability, but Cibalia’s strong scoring form and recent goal numbers (last 5 matches BTTS 60% for both) tilt the prediction toward both teams scoring. Therefore I forecast BTTS - Yes 65% vs No 35%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model and historical figures yield a combined expected goals total of about 2.72: Jarun xG 1.51, xG conceded vs Cibalia 1.35 → 1.43 expected goals for the home side, and Cibalia xG 1.32 with xG conceded vs Jarun 1.25 → 1.29 for the away side. Jarun averages 1.94 goals at home, Cibalia 1.20 away; Jarun also has a higher shot conversion rate 19% vs 13% for Cibalia and more shots on target 4.19 vs 3.86, which increases the likelihood of goals. Season metrics show Jarun matches finished over 1.5 goals in 88% of cases and Cibalia in 60%, while BTTS rates are 44% and 60% respectively, supporting a scenario of at least two goals. The 2.5 line is more balanced – Over 2.5 occurred in 50% of Jarun matches and 60% of Cibalia matches, and the 2.72 expected goals gives a moderate edge to Over 2.5 (estimated ~58%). The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (est. 85%), whereas Over 3.5 is unlikely (≈28%), so I recommend betting Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal statistics favor Jarun: the home side scores an average of 1.94 goals per match compared to Cibalia’s 1.20 and concedes only 0.75 goals versus the visitors’ 1.33, with home win rate at 69% versus 33% for away. Jarun led at the break in 7 matches (44%), Cibalia in 5 (33%), but in the last 5 fixtures the visitors have the edge (form 'wlwww' — 4 wins, 80% vs Jarun form 'llwll' — 1 win, 20%), suggesting Cibalia may start stronger. Both teams score little in the first half (on average 0.75 goals for the home side vs 0.67 for the away by half-time), so a draw at HT or a minimal lead is expected. Jarun are, however, very strong after the break: they score 1.19 goals on average in the second half versus Cibalia’s 0.53 and have 94% of matches with at least one goal in the second half, so the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Jarun victory at full-time (HT/FT = X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Jarun | Cibalia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cibalia is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Jarun · 2.4 pts / match - Cibalia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cibalia is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
1.03 goals / match - Jarun · 1.56 goals / match - Cibalia
Cibalia is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.28 goals / match - Jarun · 1 goals / match - Cibalia
Jarun scores in 63% of matches (20 of 32 matches), while Cibalia keeps a clean sheet in 44% (14 of 32 matches).
Cibalia scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while Jarun keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Jarun
Over / Under - Cibalia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cibalia is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Jarun · 1.56 pts / match - Cibalia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jarun - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cibalia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Jarun
Cibalia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).
Teams vs league
| Jarun | Liga | Cibalia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.31 | 2.35 | ▲ 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 44% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 31% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | • 69% | 69% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | • 75% | 76% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Jarun 1 - 0 - 1 Cibalia. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Jarun vs Cibalia?
The Druga HNL match finished Jarun 1:1 Cibalia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Jarun and Cibalia?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Jarun won 1, Cibalia won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Jarun vs Cibalia?
Jarun score 1.03 goals per game on average and Cibalia 1.56. The Druga HNL average is 2.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Jarun's matches and 50% of Cibalia's.
What form are Jarun and Cibalia in?
Over the last 5 games Jarun have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Cibalia 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jarun vs Cibalia?
The statistical background for Jarun vs Cibalia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


