Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 24 October 2026

Jesenice vs Ilirija: match statistics

Jesenice crest
Jesenice
3 : 1half-time 2:1
Ilirija crest
Ilirija

Jesenice vs Ilirija: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Jesenice played Ilirija in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Jesenice: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Ilirija: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Jesenice scores 1.20 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Ilirija scores 2.00 and concedes 0.40. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Jesenice 40%, Ilirija 20%. Over 2.5: Jesenice 40%, Ilirija 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Ilirija has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.55. Jesenice: 12.6 shots per match, Ilirija: 14.4.

Match halves

Jesenice: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80. Ilirija: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Jesenice: 46-60 (2 goals). Ilirija: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ilirija sit 2nd and have collected 10 points from their last five matches, winning 3 games, while Jesenice have taken 7 points during the same period. The visitors are significantly more effective away from home: they score an average of 3.5 goals per match with an xG of 2.00, while the hosts average 1.33 goals at home with an xG of 1.76. Ilirija also create more danger, averaging 14.5 shots and 6 on target, compared with Jesenice’s 13.67 attempts and 4.67 on target, while their shot conversion rate stands at 24% versus 10% for their opponents. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in any home match and concede an average of 1.67 goals, which favours the visitors’ attacking potential. Jesenice can exploit the fact that Ilirija allow an average away xG of 1.24, but the superior chance quality and current attacking efficiency point to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No pick is primarily supported by Jesenice’s very solid home defense: the hosts have not conceded yet and have kept a clean sheet in 100% of such matches. Ilirija boasts a high average of 3.5 goals scored away from home and an xG of 2.00, making their goal highly likely, but this does not guarantee a goal from the hosts. Jesenice score only 1.0 goal per home match, with a conversion rate of 7%, while Ilirija concede an average of 1.0 goal and have kept clean sheets in 50% of matches. Jesenice’s seasonal BTTS rate is 0%, compared with a league average of just 41%, reinforcing the scenario in which at least one team fails to score. The last five matches provide a more balanced signal, with BTTS landing in 40% of Jesenice’s games and 60% of Ilirija’s; however, the defensive data still slightly favors BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Ilirija clearly offer greater attacking potential: they are averaging 3.5 goals this season and 2.2 across their last five matches, compared with Jesenice’s 1.2. The visitors are also creating more high-quality chances, recording an average xG of 2.00 for the season and 1.74 in their last five games, along with 6.0 shots on target per match. All of Ilirija’s matches so far have gone Over 1.5 goals, with 100% of their games producing at least one goal. Jesenice have a run of tighter results, with 0% of their matches going Over 2.5 goals this season, although their last five outings have produced an average of 2.4 total goals. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest option, as the visitors’ attacking power significantly increases the likelihood of at least two goals, even with the hosts’ more cautious profile.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ilirija have the stronger offensive profile: they score an average of 3.5 goals per match, generate 2.00 xG and register 6 shots on target, compared with Jesenice’s 1.0 goal, 1.64 xG and 4 shots on target. The visitors held a lead at the break in 50% of their matches, rising to 60% across their last five, while Jesenice were trailing at half-time in 40% of their games during this period. Ilirija’s first-half advantage is also clear in their goal output: they average 1.5 goals in the opening 45 minutes, compared with just 0.33 for Jesenice. Over the last five rounds, the visitors won 60% of their matches and averaged 2.2 goals, whereas the hosts recorded a 40% win rate, scoring 1.2 and conceding 1.2 goals per game. Jesenice kept a clean sheet in their only home sample, but Ilirija’s higher volume of chances and significantly more efficient finishing—24% compared with 7%—support the HT/FT scenario of the visitors leading at the break and securing the final win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
JeseniceIlirija
11Shots6
JeseniceIlirija
5Shots on target1
JeseniceIlirija
0xG0
JeseniceIlirija
4Corners1
JeseniceIlirija
0Dangerous attacks0
JeseniceIlirija
14Fouls18
JeseniceIlirija
0Cards0
JeseniceIlirija

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match2
JeseniceIlirija
1.4Goals conceded / match0.4
JeseniceIlirija
52%Average possession61%
JeseniceIlirija
4Shots on target / match4.8
JeseniceIlirija

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.6Shots per match14.4
JeseniceIlirija
4Shots on target4.8
JeseniceIlirija
9.5%Shot conversion13.9%
JeseniceIlirija
52%Possession61%
JeseniceIlirija
1.55xG for1.78
JeseniceIlirija
1.57xG against1.26
JeseniceIlirija

Shooting quality

Jesenice: BalancedIlirija: Dominant
JeseniceIlirija
Accuracy (shots on target)32%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ilirija is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Jesenice · 2 pts / match - Ilirija

Jesenice
LDWWL
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Ilirija
WWWLD
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilirija is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Jesenice · 2 goals / match - Ilirija

Ilirija is 250% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - Jesenice · 0.4 goals / match - Ilirija

Jesenice scoring profile: more difficult

Jesenice scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Ilirija keeps a clean sheet in 80% (4 of 5 matches).

Ilirija scoring profile: very strong

Ilirija scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Jesenice keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

6Goals scored (season)10
JeseniceIlirija
7Goals conceded (season)2
JeseniceIlirija
2.6Average goals in match2.4
JeseniceIlirija
6Goals scored (last 5)10
JeseniceIlirija
7Goals conceded (last 5)2
JeseniceIlirija

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal80%
JeseniceIlirija
40%2 goals40%
JeseniceIlirija
20%3 goals20%
JeseniceIlirija
0%4 goals20%
JeseniceIlirija

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal20%
JeseniceIlirija
40%2 goals20%
JeseniceIlirija
20%3 goals0%
JeseniceIlirija
0%4 goals0%
JeseniceIlirija

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
JeseniceIlirija
0%BTTS in both halves0%
JeseniceIlirija
20%Scored in both halves40%
JeseniceIlirija

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
JeseniceIlirija
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
JeseniceIlirija
40%BTTS - last 520%
JeseniceIlirija

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
JeseniceIlirija
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
JeseniceIlirija
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
JeseniceIlirija

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
JeseniceIlirija
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
JeseniceIlirija
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
JeseniceIlirija

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilirija is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Jesenice · 1.6 pts / match - Ilirija

Jesenice - half-time state
40% leading20% draw40% trailing
Ilirija - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)1.6
JeseniceIlirija
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.8
JeseniceIlirija
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
JeseniceIlirija
1Average goals (1st half)1.2
JeseniceIlirija
60%Clean sheet before half-time80%
JeseniceIlirija
60%No goal before half-time40%
JeseniceIlirija

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)2.2
JeseniceIlirija
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
JeseniceIlirija
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0
JeseniceIlirija
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.2
JeseniceIlirija
20%Clean sheet after half-time100%
JeseniceIlirija
60%No goal after half-time40%
JeseniceIlirija

Jesenice - second-half results

40% W0% D60% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ilirija - second-half results

60% W40% D0% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jesenice - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ilirija - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Jesenice
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Ilirija
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Jesenice

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Ilirija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
23%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

JeseniceLigaIlirija
Average goals in match▼ 2.602.98▼ 2.40
Both teams scored▼ 40%44%▼ 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 40%56%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▼ 20%33%▲ 80%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%71%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%80%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.71
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Jesenice 0 - 0 - 2 Ilirija. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

ND Ilirija 1911
2 : 0
NK Jesenice
NK Jesenice
0 : 3
ND Ilirija 1911

FAQ

What was the result of Jesenice vs Ilirija?

The 2. SNL match finished Jesenice 3:1 Ilirija. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Jesenice and Ilirija?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Jesenice won 0, Ilirija won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Jesenice vs Ilirija?

Jesenice score 1.20 goals per game on average and Ilirija 2.00. The 2. SNL average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Jesenice's matches and 20% of Ilirija's.

What form are Jesenice and Ilirija in?

Over the last 5 games Jesenice have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Ilirija 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jesenice vs Ilirija?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Jesenice vs Ilirija: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.