Finland - YkkösliigaMustapekka AreenaData current as of 17 October 2026

KäPa vs MP: match statistics

KäPa crest
KäPa
1 : 1half-time 1:1
MP crest
MP

KäPa vs MP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KäPa played MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 9 October 2026. Venue: Mustapekka Areena. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

KäPa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. MP: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

KäPa scores 1.20 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. MP scores 1.08 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KäPa 68%, MP 48%. Over 2.5: KäPa 72%, MP 40%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. KäPa: 11.0 shots per match, MP: 11.5.

Match halves

KäPa: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.68. MP: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.44.

Goals by minute

KäPa: 61-75 (7 goals). MP: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KäPa have a slight home advantage, averaging 1.25 goals per match at home, while MP score 1.00 away goals per game and have lost 62% of their away matches. The hosts also create slightly better chances, recording a home xG of 1.42 compared with the visitors’ away xG of 1.34. Both teams have won 2 of their last 5 matches, but KäPa scored 9 goals over that run, compared with 5 for MP. The hosts’ main weakness is their defence: they concede an average of 1.83 goals at home, while MP allow 1.38 goals per away match. I’m therefore backing a KäPa win, although there is little to separate the two sides.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has occurred in 50% of KäPa’s matches and 46% of MP’s fixtures, so the full-season data do not give either outcome a clear edge. However, the case for both teams to score is supported by the hosts averaging 1.17 goals scored and 1.42 conceded, while the visitors average 1.00 scored and 1.38 conceded per match. Their attacking potential is also reflected in xG figures of 1.41 for KäPa and 1.34 for MP, with opponents allowing xG of 1.58 and 1.50 respectively. In their last five matches, KäPa recorded BTTS in 80% of games and conceded an average of 2.0 goals, boosting MP’s chances of finding the net. Caution is still warranted, however, as MP failed to score in 31% of matches, so the edge for BTTS - Yes remains slight.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is for Under 3.5 goals: this outcome occurred in 75% of KäPy matches and 77% of MP matches. The home side averages 1.17 goals scored, while the visitors average 1.00, although xG figures of 1.41 and 1.34, respectively, suggest both teams can create chances. KäPy’s last five matches produced an average of 3.8 goals, compared with just 2.0 for MP, so the home side’s recent uptick should be treated with caution. The forecast of 2.55 goals is close to the league average of 2.57 and supports Under 3.5, where both teams’ season results align much more clearly than at the 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is a realistic scenario: MP were level at the break in 54% of their matches this season, while KäPa were level in 40% of their last five. At the same time, recent form offers little reason to expect the hosts to take an early lead — they had not been ahead at half-time in any of their last five matches, whereas MP had led in three. After the break, the advantage could shift to KäPa, who scored an average of 1.4 goals in the second half across their last five matches and won the second half in 60% of cases. The hosts’ full-season record also supports a home win: they won 42% of their matches compared with MP’s 23%, while the visitors lost 62% of their games. Therefore, a draw at half-time followed by a KäPa win is the most likely single outcome, although MP’s strong second-half defence in their last five matches, conceding an average of just 0.2 goals, limits confidence in this pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
KäPaMP
15Shots5
KäPaMP
6Shots on target3
KäPaMP
2.01xG0.87
KäPaMP
5Corners4
KäPaMP
90Dangerous attacks46
KäPaMP
11Fouls16
KäPaMP
4Cards1
KäPaMP

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match1.08
KäPaMP
1.8Goals conceded / match1.4
KäPaMP
50%Average possession50%
KäPaMP
3.88Shots on target / match4
KäPaMP

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.96Shots per match11.52
KäPaMP
3.88Shots on target4
KäPaMP
10.9%Shot conversion9.4%
KäPaMP
50%Possession50%
KäPaMP
1.38xG for1.37
KäPaMP
1.66xG against1.54
KäPaMP

Shooting quality

KäPa: BalancedMP: Balanced
KäPaMP
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KäPa
DDLWW
Season result split
24% W24% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-13
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-6
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
MP
LWDWD
Season result split
32% W20% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-12
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KäPa is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - KäPa · 1.08 goals / match - MP

MP is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - KäPa · 1.4 goals / match - MP

KäPa scoring profile: very strong

KäPa scores in 72% of matches (18 of 25 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

MP scoring profile: very strong

MP scores in 72% of matches (18 of 25 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 25 matches).

30Goals scored (season)27
KäPaMP
45Goals conceded (season)35
KäPaMP
3Average goals in match2.48
KäPaMP
9Goals scored (last 5)5
KäPaMP
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
KäPaMP

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal72%
KäPaMP
36%2 goals28%
KäPaMP
12%3 goals8%
KäPaMP
0%4 goals0%
KäPaMP

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal76%
KäPaMP
68%2 goals36%
KäPaMP
20%3 goals24%
KäPaMP
4%4 goals4%
KäPaMP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time16%
KäPaMP
4%BTTS in both halves4%
KäPaMP
16%Scored in both halves12%
KäPaMP

BTTS and goal count

68%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
KäPaMP
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
KäPaMP
80%BTTS - last 540%
KäPaMP

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
KäPaMP
56%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
KäPaMP
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
KäPaMP

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
KäPaMP
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
KäPaMP
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
KäPaMP

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MP is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - KäPa · 1.48 pts / match - MP

KäPa - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
MP - half-time state
40% leading28% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.48
KäPaMP
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.64
KäPaMP
0.92Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
KäPaMP
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.32
KäPaMP
48%Clean sheet before half-time56%
KäPaMP
56%No goal before half-time52%
KäPaMP

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1
KäPaMP
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
KäPaMP
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.72
KäPaMP
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.16
KäPaMP
36%Clean sheet after half-time56%
KäPaMP
56%No goal after half-time64%
KäPaMP

KäPa - second-half results

16% W40% D44% L
25
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MP - second-half results

16% W52% D32% L
37
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 32%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.60.4
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-6+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
3
10
16-30
4
8
31-45
6
6
46-60
7
3
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

MP
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
4
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
0
6
46-60
2
3
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KäPaLigaMP
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.57• 2.48
Both teams scored▲ 68%46%▲ 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 72%46%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▼ 12%31%▼ 24%
Goal before half-time▲ 72%66%▲ 76%
Goal after half-time▲ 76%74%▼ 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KäPaYellow cardDaniel Ripatti
  2. MPYellow cardNiila Forsell
  3. KäPaYellow cardOtto Heinonen
  4. KäPaYellow cardSameli Puputti
  5. KäPaYellow cardHugo Toivonen
  6. MPSubstitutionOn: Santeri SteniusOff: Ebuka Obioha Samson
  7. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Emil AholaOff: Hugo Toivonen
  8. MPSubstitutionOn: Miko KoivuniemiOff: Akseli Tervaniemi
  9. KäPaSubstitutionOn: Joonas SalmiOff: Niklas Leinonen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): KäPa 1 - 0 - 1 MP. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KäPa vs MP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished KäPa 1:1 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KäPa and MP?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KäPa won 1, MP won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KäPa vs MP?

KäPa score 1.20 goals per game on average and MP 1.08. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 68% of KäPa's matches and 48% of MP's.

What form are KäPa and MP in?

Over the last 5 games KäPa have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and MP 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KäPa vs MP?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.