Scotland - PremiershipRugby ParkData current as of 03 November 2026

Kilmarnock vs Hearts: match statistics

Kilmarnock crest
Kilmarnock
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Hearts crest
Hearts

Kilmarnock vs Hearts: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kilmarnock played Hearts in Premiership (Scotland). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: Rugby Park. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Kilmarnock: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Hearts: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kilmarnock scores 0.83 and concedes 2.33 goals per match. Hearts scores 2.17 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kilmarnock 33%, Hearts 83%. Over 2.5: Kilmarnock 50%, Hearts 100%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Hearts has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.30. Kilmarnock: 10.8 shots per match, Hearts: 15.3.

Match halves

Kilmarnock: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.50. Hearts: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Kilmarnock: 46-60 (3 goals). Hearts: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premiership: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Hearts are clear favourites, having remained unbeaten in their last five matches, collecting 13 points and winning 4 games, while Kilmarnock have managed just 5 points. The visitors have scored 12 goals during this period, compared with only 4 for the hosts, which clearly reflects the difference in their current attacking efficiency. At home, Kilmarnock have lost every match so far, averaging just 0.33 goals and failing to score in 67% of such fixtures. The hosts’ defence allows opponents an xG of 2.23 and concedes an average of 3.33 goals per home game, while Hearts average 2 goals and an xG of 1.55 away from home. The visitors also register more shots per match, 14 compared with 11.67, with a significantly better conversion rate of 14% versus 3%; therefore, a Hearts victory is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both sides to score is clear in the seasonal data: BTTS occurred in 67% of Kilmarnock’s matches and as many as 100% of Hearts’ games, compared with a league average of 52%. Kilmarnock average 2.67 goals at home with an xG of 2.03, while Hearts have kept no clean sheets away from home and allow opponents an xG of 1.47. Hearts are also in very good offensive form, scoring an average of 2.4 goals in their last 5 matches, while Kilmarnock conceded 1.6 goals per game during this period. The risk to the pick is the hosts’ weaker recent efficiency: they scored only 0.8 goals per match in their last 5 games and recorded BTTS in 40% of them. However, their creative potential, reflected by an xG of 1.67, combined with Hearts’ weak defence, still supports a Kilmarnock goal. The most likely scenario therefore remains one in which both teams score at least once.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The goal profile clearly supports at least two goals: both Kilmarnock’s home matches and Hearts’ away games finished with over 1.5 goals in 100% of cases. The hosts create an average of 2.03 xG at home and register 7.0 shots on target per match, while Hearts generate 1.55 xG away from home. Hearts’ defence allows an average of 1.47 xG, and Kilmarnock conceded 1.6 goals per game across their last five matches, giving the visitors a realistic path to scoring. Hearts have scored 12 goals in their last five matches and are on a four-match winning streak, although Kilmarnock’s recent scoring rate of 0.8 goals per game reduces confidence in higher lines. Therefore, Over 1.5 is the safest choice, as the projected total of 2.90 goals and the very strong indicators for both teams clearly point towards at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Hearts leading at the break and holding on for the win: in their last five matches, the visitors won 80% of their games, compared with just 20% for Kilmarnock. Hearts led at half-time in 60% of those fixtures, scoring an average of 1.2 goals, while Kilmarnock scored just 0.2 goals in the first halves and conceded 1.0. The visitors’ post-break form is also clearly superior, as they average 1.2 goals and won the second half in 60% of their last matches, whereas the hosts managed only 0.6 goals. Kilmarnock’s home advantage, where the team averages 2.03 xG compared with Hearts’ 1.55, limits confidence in the selection, but the current difference in form and first-half efficiency clearly strengthens the 2/2 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
KilmarnockHearts
4Shots17
KilmarnockHearts
0Shots on target3
KilmarnockHearts
0.4xG1.64
KilmarnockHearts
2Corners6
KilmarnockHearts
18Dangerous attacks49
KilmarnockHearts
13Fouls17
KilmarnockHearts
2Cards2
KilmarnockHearts

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.83Goals scored / match2.17
KilmarnockHearts
2.33Goals conceded / match1.17
KilmarnockHearts
44%Average possession53%
KilmarnockHearts
4.5Shots on target / match5.67
KilmarnockHearts

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.83Shots per match15.33
KilmarnockHearts
4.5Shots on target5.67
KilmarnockHearts
7.7%Shot conversion14.1%
KilmarnockHearts
44%Possession53%
KilmarnockHearts
1.3xG for1.72
KilmarnockHearts
2.03xG against1.16
KilmarnockHearts

Shooting quality

Kilmarnock: BalancedHearts: Attacking
KilmarnockHearts
Accuracy (shots on target)42%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.180.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hearts is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Kilmarnock · 2.4 pts / match - Hearts

Kilmarnock
LLLDW
Season result split
17% W17% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-4
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 at home
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 2.10BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Hearts
WWWWL
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-2
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
LWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hearts is 161% better for: goals scored per match.

0.83 goals / match - Kilmarnock · 2.17 goals / match - Hearts

Hearts is 99% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.33 goals / match - Kilmarnock · 1.17 goals / match - Hearts

Kilmarnock scoring profile: strong

Kilmarnock scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Hearts keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Hearts scoring profile: very strong

Hearts scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Kilmarnock keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

5Goals scored (season)13
KilmarnockHearts
14Goals conceded (season)7
KilmarnockHearts
3.17Average goals in match3.33
KilmarnockHearts
2Goals scored (last 5)12
KilmarnockHearts
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
KilmarnockHearts

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
KilmarnockHearts
17%2 goals67%
KilmarnockHearts
17%3 goals33%
KilmarnockHearts
0%4 goals17%
KilmarnockHearts

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal83%
KilmarnockHearts
50%2 goals33%
KilmarnockHearts
50%3 goals0%
KilmarnockHearts
50%4 goals0%
KilmarnockHearts

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
KilmarnockHearts
17%BTTS in both halves0%
KilmarnockHearts
17%Scored in both halves33%
KilmarnockHearts

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS83%
KilmarnockHearts
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
KilmarnockHearts
20%BTTS - last 580%
KilmarnockHearts

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KilmarnockHearts
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
KilmarnockHearts
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KilmarnockHearts

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KilmarnockHearts
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
KilmarnockHearts
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KilmarnockHearts

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hearts is 161% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - Kilmarnock · 2.17 pts / match - Hearts

Kilmarnock - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing
Hearts - half-time state
67% leading17% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)2.17
KilmarnockHearts
0.33Goals scored (1st half)1.33
KilmarnockHearts
1.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
KilmarnockHearts
1.67Average goals (1st half)1.67
KilmarnockHearts
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
KilmarnockHearts
67%No goal before half-time17%
KilmarnockHearts

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)1.17
KilmarnockHearts
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
KilmarnockHearts
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
KilmarnockHearts
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.67
KilmarnockHearts
50%Clean sheet after half-time33%
KilmarnockHearts
67%No goal after half-time50%
KilmarnockHearts

Kilmarnock - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hearts - second-half results

33% W17% D50% L
13
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kilmarnock - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-6-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Hearts - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kilmarnock
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Hearts
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 2.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
125%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kilmarnock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
169%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Hearts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 31% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premiership).

Teams vs league

KilmarnockLigaHearts
Average goals in match▲ 3.172.60▲ 3.33
Both teams scored▼ 33%53%▲ 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%55%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▲ 33%26%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%78%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%78%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KilmarnockYellow cardCathal McCarthy
  2. HeartsGoalJamie Mccart
  3. HeartsSubstitutionOn: Harry MilneOff: Stuart Findlay
  4. HeartsYellow cardStephen Kingsley
  5. KilmarnockSubstitutionOn: Aaron TshibolaOff: Bailey Rice
  6. HeartsSubstitutionOn: Sabah KerjotaOff: Calvin Miller
  7. KilmarnockSubstitutionOn: Mark O'HaraOff: Tyreece John-Jules
  8. KilmarnockSubstitutionOn: Rory McKenzieOff: Thomas Richard Lowery
  9. KilmarnockYellow cardMichael Schjonning-Larsen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Kilmarnock 1 - 1 - 1 Hearts. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kilmarnock vs Hearts?

The Premiership match finished Kilmarnock 1:1 Hearts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kilmarnock and Hearts?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kilmarnock won 1, Hearts won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kilmarnock vs Hearts?

Kilmarnock score 0.83 goals per game on average and Hearts 2.17. The Premiership average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Kilmarnock's matches and 83% of Hearts's.

What form are Kilmarnock and Hearts in?

Over the last 5 games Kilmarnock have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Hearts 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kilmarnock vs Hearts?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kilmarnock vs Hearts: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.