Kolding IF vs Lyngby: match statistics
Kolding IF vs Lyngby: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kolding IF played Lyngby in 1st Division (Denmark). The match was played on 15 May 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Kolding IF: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Lyngby: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kolding IF scores 1.14 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Lyngby scores 2.24 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.77 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kolding IF 52%, Lyngby 59%. Over 2.5: Kolding IF 48%, Lyngby 69%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Lyngby has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.49. Kolding IF: 12.9 shots per match, Lyngby: 13.9.
Match halves
Kolding IF: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.55. Lyngby: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.34.
Goals by minute
Kolding IF: 31-45+ (10 goals). Lyngby: 76-90+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1st Division: 2.77 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lyngby is the favorite based on seasonal and recent metrics: the visitors are 1st with 17 wins this season versus Kolding’s 9 wins, and in the last five matches Lyngby has won 4 and scored 13 goals while Kolding has 0 wins and only 2 goals. The form gap is clear — Kolding averaged 0.2 points per match in the last 5 fixtures and conceded 9 goals, while Lyngby averaged 2.4 points and conceded 4 goals. In terms of finishing Lyngby also dominates: away they score 2.21 goals on average with xG 1.59 and shot conversion around 17%, whereas Kolding at home has 1.29 goals with xG 1.61 and a 9% conversion, indicating the hosts waste chances. Defensively both teams are similar (Kolding concedes 1.00 goal at home vs 1.21 for Lyngby away), but the lower share of goalless matches for the visitors (Lyngby fail to score in 14% of away games vs 21% for Kolding at home) and more on-target shots for the visitors (5.07 vs 4.57) give Lyngby the edge. Therefore I expect a Lyngby win and a match with multiple goals (average total goals 3.43 in Lyngby away games vs 2.29 in Kolding home games).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show strong seasonal BTTS indicators: Kolding 60% and Lyngby 57%, both above the league average of 55%, increasing the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Kolding averages 2.27 goals per match and Lyngby 2.21, while Kolding concedes 0.93 and Lyngby 1.21 — both sides have offensive potential and a tendency to concede. xG also supports goals: xG for 1.75 (Kolding) vs 1.59 (Lyngby), and xG against 1.09 vs 1.36, indicating both teams create chances and allow them. In the last 5 matches Lyngby scored 13 goals (2.6 avg) and conceded 0.8, while Kolding scored 2 goals (0.4) and conceded 1.8, meaning Lyngby is in scoring form and the home side has been less effective recently. Additionally, 73% and 64% of these teams' matches finish over 2.5 goals, and the combination of over 2.5 goals with BTTS = Yes stands at 53% and 56%, therefore I recommend BTTS = Yes with probability 75% (No 25%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams display strong attacking metrics: Kolding averages 2.27 goals at home, Lyngby 2.21 away; season xG is 1.75 for Kolding and 1.59 for Lyngby, and after adjusting for opponents’ defensive xG I estimate 1.56 expected goals for the home side and 1.34 for the visitors (sum 2.90). Season-long lines >1.5 fall in 93% of Kolding’s matches and 86% of Lyngby’s, with only 7–14% of outcomes below 1.5, which is a very strong signal for Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line we see 73% overs for the home team and 64% for the away team; additionally average shots (14.6 vs 13.07), shots on target (5.6 vs 5.07) and high conversion (16%/17%) increase the probability of Over 2.5 — I estimate around 70%. The 3.5 line is less convincing: season overs are 33% and 57%, and xG ~2.9 does not provide a clear margin for 4+ goals, so I assign about 43% to Over 3.5. Therefore the best pick is Over 1.5, as the strongest signal from the data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal first-half statistics favor Kolding: the home side led at the break in 7 matches (47%) and average 1.07 goals by half-time versus 0.71 for Lyngby. Additionally, xG 1.75 (Kolding) versus 1.59 (Lyngby) and an average of 5.6 shots on target compared to 5.07 indicate higher quality of chances for the hosts before the break. Lyngby, however, shows clear strength after the break and good recent form: an average of 1.93 goals in second halves this season, 79% of second halves won, 80% wins in the last 5 matches and 2.6 goals on average in that period. In the last 5 games Lyngby scored an average of 1.8 goals after the break, while Kolding scored no goals after the break (0.0), yet the hosts' advantage in HT statistics (scoredAVGHT 1.07 vs 0.71 and concededAVGHT 0.47 vs 0.79) and superior xG predispose them to maintain the lead. For this reason my strongest signal is 1/1 (Kolding leads at half-time and wins full-time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kolding IF | Lyngby | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lyngby is 1100% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Kolding IF · 2.4 pts / match - Lyngby
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lyngby is 96% better for: goals scored per match.
1.14 goals / match - Kolding IF · 2.24 goals / match - Lyngby
Lyngby is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.24 goals / match - Kolding IF · 1.07 goals / match - Lyngby
Kolding IF scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Lyngby keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 matches).
Lyngby scores in 90% of matches (26 of 29 matches), while Kolding IF keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kolding IF
Over / Under - Lyngby
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lyngby is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Kolding IF · 1.52 pts / match - Lyngby
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kolding IF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Lyngby - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kolding IF
Lyngby
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).
Teams vs league
| Kolding IF | Liga | Lyngby | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.38 | 2.77 | ▲ 3.31 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 54% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 26% | ▲ 34% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 72% | 74% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 79% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Kolding IF 0 - 0 - 3 Lyngby. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kolding IF vs Lyngby?
The 1st Division match finished Kolding IF 1:3 Lyngby. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kolding IF and Lyngby?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kolding IF won 0, Lyngby won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kolding IF vs Lyngby?
Kolding IF score 1.14 goals per game on average and Lyngby 2.24. The 1st Division average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Kolding IF's matches and 59% of Lyngby's.
What form are Kolding IF and Lyngby in?
Over the last 5 games Kolding IF have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Lyngby 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kolding IF vs Lyngby?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.