Finland - VeikkausliigaSavon Sanomat AreenaData current as of 17 October 2026

KuPS vs VPS: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

KuPS vs VPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KuPS play VPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 18 October 2026. Venue: Savon Sanomat Areena.

Current form

KuPS: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. VPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KuPS scores 1.52 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. VPS scores 1.15 and concedes 1.15. League average: 2.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KuPS 56%, VPS 44%. Over 2.5: KuPS 37%, VPS 37%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

KuPS has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.43. KuPS: 14.8 shots per match, VPS: 11.9.

Match halves

KuPS: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.52. VPS: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

KuPS: 31-45+ (12 goals). VPS: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 2.40, BTTS 60%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(1.53)
(3.90)
(5.75)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.52Goals scored / match1.15
KuPSVPS
0.96Goals conceded / match1.15
KuPSVPS
56%Average possession47%
KuPSVPS
5.11Shots on target / match4.26
KuPSVPS

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.81Shots per match11.89
KuPSVPS
5.11Shots on target4.26
KuPSVPS
10.3%Shot conversion9.7%
KuPSVPS
56%Possession47%
KuPSVPS
1.71xG for1.43
KuPSVPS
1.27xG against1.37
KuPSVPS

Shooting quality

KuPS: DominantVPS: Balanced
KuPSVPS
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

VPS is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - KuPS · 1.2 pts / match - VPS

KuPS
DDWLL
Season result split
48% W33% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-9-5
1.78 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
VPS
WLLLW
Season result split
41% W22% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-10
1.44 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KuPS is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

1.52 goals / match - KuPS · 1.15 goals / match - VPS

KuPS is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.96 goals / match - KuPS · 1.15 goals / match - VPS

KuPS scoring profile: very strong

KuPS scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

VPS scoring profile: strong

VPS scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

41Goals scored (season)31
KuPSVPS
26Goals conceded (season)31
KuPSVPS
2.48Average goals in match2.3
KuPSVPS
3Goals scored (last 5)2
KuPSVPS
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
KuPSVPS

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal67%
KuPSVPS
44%2 goals22%
KuPSVPS
22%3 goals15%
KuPSVPS
7%4 goals7%
KuPSVPS

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal70%
KuPSVPS
15%2 goals22%
KuPSVPS
7%3 goals11%
KuPSVPS
4%4 goals4%
KuPSVPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time15%
KuPSVPS
7%BTTS in both halves0%
KuPSVPS
22%Scored in both halves11%
KuPSVPS

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
KuPSVPS
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
KuPSVPS
20%BTTS - last 50%
KuPSVPS

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
KuPSVPS
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
KuPSVPS
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
KuPSVPS

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
KuPSVPS
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
KuPSVPS
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
KuPSVPS

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KuPS is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.85 pts / match - KuPS · 1.41 pts / match - VPS

KuPS - half-time state
52% leading30% draw19% trailing
VPS - half-time state
37% leading30% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.85Points per match (1st half)1.41
KuPSVPS
1Goals scored (1st half)0.67
KuPSVPS
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
KuPSVPS
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.37
KuPSVPS
63%Clean sheet before half-time52%
KuPSVPS
37%No goal before half-time56%
KuPSVPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.26
KuPSVPS
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
KuPSVPS
0.52Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
KuPSVPS
1.04Average goals (2nd half)0.93
KuPSVPS
52%Clean sheet after half-time67%
KuPSVPS
63%No goal after half-time67%
KuPSVPS

KuPS - second-half results

22% W48% D30% L
50
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 48%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

VPS - second-half results

26% W48% D26% L
38
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.80.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
VPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
8
6
0-15
7
2
16-30
12
4
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
5
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

VPS
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
3
7
16-30
8
8
31-45
3
2
46-60
6
8
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.39
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.78
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

KuPSLigaVPS
Average goals in match• 2.482.49▼ 2.30
Both teams scored▲ 56%48%▼ 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 37%43%▼ 37%
Clean sheets• 30%30%• 30%
Goal before half-time▲ 78%72%▲ 78%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%72%▼ 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): KuPS 2 - 2 - 1 VPS. Average goals 2.40, both teams scored in 60% matches.

VPS
0 : 2
KuPS
KuPS
3 : 1
VPS
VPS
1 : 1
KuPS
Vaasan Palloseura
1 : 1
Kuopion Palloseura
Kuopion Palloseura
0 : 2
Vaasan Palloseura

FAQ

When do KuPS and VPS play?

KuPS face VPS on 18 October 2026 in Veikkausliiga at Savon Sanomat Areena. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between KuPS and VPS?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches KuPS won 2, VPS won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KuPS vs VPS?

KuPS score 1.52 goals per game on average and VPS 1.15. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 56% of KuPS's matches and 44% of VPS's.

What form are KuPS and VPS in?

Over the last 5 games KuPS have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and VPS 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KuPS vs VPS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.