Belgium - Pro LeagueHet KuipjeData current as of 15 October 2026

KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC: match statistics

KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KVC Westerlo played Royal Antwerp FC in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Het Kuipje. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

KVC Westerlo: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Royal Antwerp FC: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

KVC Westerlo scores 2.14 and concedes 2.29 goals per match. Royal Antwerp FC scores 1.57 and concedes 2.14. League average: 2.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KVC Westerlo 57%, Royal Antwerp FC 57%. Over 2.5: KVC Westerlo 86%, Royal Antwerp FC 71%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Royal Antwerp FC has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.67. KVC Westerlo: 15.3 shots per match, Royal Antwerp FC: 15.1.

Match halves

KVC Westerlo: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.00. Royal Antwerp FC: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

KVC Westerlo: 0-15 (6 goals). Royal Antwerp FC: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KVC Westerlo are favourites primarily on the strength of their recent results: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 12 goals, while Royal Antwerp FC have failed to win any of their 5 games, scoring 6 and conceding 14. At home, Westerlo average 2.33 goals per match and convert 18% of their shots, while Antwerp average 1.33 goals away from home with a 9% conversion rate. The visitors can still create chances, however — their away xG stands at 1.75, compared with the hosts’ 1.52 at home. That matters given Westerlo’s defensive frailties: they concede an average of 3 goals at home and are yet to keep a clean sheet. Even so, the hosts’ recent form and Antwerp’s 2 defeats in 3 away games point towards a home win, although the risk of conceding remains high.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has landed in 75% of Westerlo’s matches, and the hosts have yet to keep a clean sheet; they concede an average of 2.75 goals, which bodes well for Antwerp to score. Westerlo score an average of 1.75 goals, while Antwerp have conceded as many as 2.8 goals per match across their last five games, making a goal from the hosts likely as well. The attacking potential of both sides is backed up by average xG figures of 1.69 for Westerlo and 1.75 for Antwerp. Caution is warranted, however, as BTTS has landed in only 33% of the visitors’ matches, and they have failed to score in 33% of them; even so, Westerlo’s weaker defence tips the assessment towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Westerlo matches average 4.50 goals, with the team scoring 1.75 and conceding 2.75 per game. In their last five appearances, the hosts averaged 2.4 goals, while Antwerp conceded 2.8, strengthening the case for Westerlo to score. The visitors could also find the net: their average xG is 1.75, while Westerlo allows opponents chances worth 1.87 xG. Over 1.5 goals has landed in 100% of Westerlo matches and 67% of Antwerp matches, making Over 1.5 the strongest pick. Although the data also supports Over 2.5, with 3.4 goals projected, the 1.5 line offers a significantly greater margin of safety.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Westerlo were level at the break in 2 of their 4 home matches, while Antwerp did so in 2 of their 3 away fixtures; the hosts have yet to lead at half-time on home soil. After the interval, the balance shifts in Westerlo’s favour: they have averaged 1.4 goals in the second half across their last five matches, while Antwerp have conceded an average of 2.2 over that period. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while the visitors have won none and lost 4, strengthening the case for a Westerlo win despite an evenly matched start. However, the X/1 pick remains moderately risky, as Westerlo led at the break 3 times in their last five matches, making 1/1 almost equally well supported.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
4 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
13Shots14
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
7Shots on target3
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.71xG1.44
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
3Corners3
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
56Dangerous attacks48
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
17Fouls11
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
2Cards5
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
2.14Goals scored / match1.57
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
2.29Goals conceded / match2.14
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
50%Average possession49%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
5.29Shots on target / match5.43
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.29Shots per match15.14
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
5.29Shots on target5.43
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
14%Shot conversion10.4%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
50%Possession49%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.67xG for1.72
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.73xG against1.96
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

Shooting quality

KVC Westerlo: AttackingRoyal Antwerp FC: Attacking
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KVC Westerlo is 900% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - KVC Westerlo · 0.2 pts / match - Royal Antwerp FC

KVC Westerlo
LDWWW
Season result split
43% W14% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-3
1.43 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Royal Antwerp FC
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
29% W14% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
WLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 2.21BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KVC Westerlo is 36% better for: goals scored per match.

2.14 goals / match - KVC Westerlo · 1.57 goals / match - Royal Antwerp FC

Royal Antwerp FC is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.29 goals / match - KVC Westerlo · 2.14 goals / match - Royal Antwerp FC

KVC Westerlo scoring profile: very strong

KVC Westerlo scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Royal Antwerp FC keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

Royal Antwerp FC scoring profile: strong

Royal Antwerp FC scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while KVC Westerlo keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

15Goals scored (season)11
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
16Goals conceded (season)15
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
4.43Average goals in match3.71
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
12Goals scored (last 5)6
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
8Goals conceded (last 5)14
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal71%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
71%2 goals43%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
29%3 goals29%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
29%4 goals14%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal86%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
71%2 goals57%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
43%3 goals43%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
29%4 goals29%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

43%BTTS at half-time29%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
14%BTTS in both halves14%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
57%Scored in both halves29%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
40%BTTS - last 560%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
71%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time86%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KVC Westerlo is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / match - KVC Westerlo · 1 pts / match - Royal Antwerp FC

KVC Westerlo - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing
Royal Antwerp FC - half-time state
14% leading57% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.14Goals scored (1st half)0.43
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
2Average goals (1st half)1
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
43%Clean sheet before half-time43%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
14%No goal before half-time57%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)1
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
1.43Goals conceded (2nd half)1.57
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
2.43Average goals (2nd half)2.71
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
29%Clean sheet after half-time29%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC
43%No goal after half-time43%
KVC WesterloRoyal Antwerp FC

KVC Westerlo - second-half results

43% W14% D43% L
12
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Royal Antwerp FC - second-half results

29% W14% D57% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KVC Westerlo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Royal Antwerp FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.62.2
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-7
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KVC Westerlo
ScoredConceded
6
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
3
31-45
3
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Royal Antwerp FC
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
4
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.07
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
139%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KVC Westerlo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
176%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Royal Antwerp FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

KVC WesterloLigaRoyal Antwerp FC
Average goals in match▲ 4.432.93▲ 3.71
Both teams scored▲ 57%41%▲ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 86%60%▲ 71%
Clean sheets▼ 29%31%▼ 14%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%79%▼ 71%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%86%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.93
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Royal Antwerp FCGoalIbrahim Salah
  2. KVC WesterloYellow cardThomas Van den Keybus
  3. KVC WesterloSubstitutionOn: Felix Emmanuel TsimbaOff: Thomas Van den Keybus
  4. Royal Antwerp FCRed cardMauricio Benítez
  5. KVC WesterloYellow cardIssai Sakamoto
  6. Royal Antwerp FCSubstitutionOn: Snayder Vladimir Porozo CaicedoOff: Michael Frey
  7. KVC WesterloGoalNorman BassetteAssist: Shunsuke Saito
  8. KVC WesterloGoalFelix Emmanuel TsimbaAssist: Norman Bassette
  9. KVC WesterloSubstitutionOn: Reda LaalaouiOff: Norman Bassette
  10. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardChristopher Gavin Scott
  11. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardSnayder Vladimir Porozo Caicedo
  12. Royal Antwerp FCSubstitutionOn: Yuto TsunashimaOff: Daam Wonnebald Foulon
  13. Royal Antwerp FCSubstitutionOn: Luis NarhOff: Semm Renders
  14. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardÁlvaro Cortés Moyano
  15. KVC WesterloGoalLasse Flø Borregaard
  16. KVC WesterloSubstitutionOn: Pape Daouda DionguOff: Cisse Sandra

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): KVC Westerlo 2 - 0 - 2 Royal Antwerp FC. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 25% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC?

The Pro League match finished KVC Westerlo 5:1 Royal Antwerp FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KVC Westerlo and Royal Antwerp FC?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KVC Westerlo won 2, Royal Antwerp FC won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC?

KVC Westerlo score 2.14 goals per game on average and Royal Antwerp FC 1.57. The Pro League average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 57% of KVC Westerlo's matches and 57% of Royal Antwerp FC's.

What form are KVC Westerlo and Royal Antwerp FC in?

Over the last 5 games KVC Westerlo have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Royal Antwerp FC 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC?

The statistical background for KVC Westerlo vs Royal Antwerp FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.