Ukraine - Ukrainian Premier LeagueCherkasy ArenaData current as of 15 October 2026

LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka: match statistics

LNZ Cherkasy crest
LNZ Cherkasy
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Kudrivka crest
Kudrivka

LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

LNZ Cherkasy played Kudrivka in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Cherkasy Arena. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

LNZ Cherkasy: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Kudrivka: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

LNZ Cherkasy scores 0.71 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Kudrivka scores 0.71 and concedes 2.57. League average: 2.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: LNZ Cherkasy 14%, Kudrivka 57%. Over 2.5: LNZ Cherkasy 43%, Kudrivka 71%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

LNZ Cherkasy has higher xG: 1.18 vs 0.49. LNZ Cherkasy: 8.3 shots per match, Kudrivka: 2.3.

Match halves

LNZ Cherkasy: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.14. Kudrivka: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.14.

Goals by minute

LNZ Cherkasy: 0-15 (2 goals). Kudrivka: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ukrainian Premier League: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

LNZ Cherkasy have a clear advantage over Kudrivka: they sit 8th, while the visitors are 16th, and have won 2 of their 3 home matches. Kudrivka have lost their last 5 games, conceding 15 goals in the process, compared with just 5 conceded by the hosts over the same period. The contrast is particularly pronounced in home and away form: LNZ average 1.67 goals scored and 0.67 conceded at home, while Kudrivka score 0.75 and concede as many as 3 goals per game away. The hosts also create better chances, posting a home xG of 1.06 compared with the visitors’ away xG of 0.42; Kudrivka average just 2 shots per game. Although LNZ have won only 1 of their last 5 matches, Kudrivka’s defensive struggles and losing streak point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to at least one team failing to score: LNZ Cherkasy have failed to find the net in 67% of their matches, while both teams scored in only 20% of their last five games. Kudrivka do have BTTS - Yes in 75% of their matches, but their attacking potential is limited by an average xG of 0.42 and just 2 shots per game. LNZ allow opponents chances worth an average of 0.60 xG, making it even harder for the visitors to score. On the other hand, Kudrivka concede an average of 3.0 goals, so a goal from the hosts is a realistic prospect, even though they score just 0.67 goals per game on average. Therefore, a one-sided scoring scenario—where only one team finds the net—is more likely than both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this threshold has been cleared in 67% of LNZ Cherkasy’s matches and 75% of Kudrivka’s. The visitors concede an average of 3.0 goals per season and have shipped 15 goals in their last five matches, giving the hosts a chance to score more than once. However, the forecast is tempered by LNZ’s modest attack, with the team averaging 0.67 goals, while Kudrivka score 0.75 per match. Both teams also have low average xG — 0.63 for the hosts and 0.42 for the visitors — so the 2.5-goal line offers no equally clear edge. An estimated total of 2.40 goals favors the lower line, although Kudrivka’s poor defense leaves room for a higher-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: LNZ Cherkasy were level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches and did not trail at half-time in any of them. A home win after the break is supported by Kudrivka’s poor form, having lost all 5 of their last matches and conceded an average of 2.0 goals in the second half during that run. LNZ also have the edge in chance creation: their average xG is 0.63 compared with the visitors’ 0.42, while Kudrivka’s average xG conceded is 1.35, against 0.60 for the hosts. However, the X/1 scenario calls for caution, as LNZ have failed to score after the break in each of their last 5 matches; despite this, the visitors’ defensive vulnerability means a late home win remains the strongest single pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
3Shots2
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
2Shots on target1
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.65xG0.5
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
9Corners5
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
43Dangerous attacks40
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
-1Fouls-1
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
2Cards1
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.71Goals scored / match0.71
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1.14Goals conceded / match2.57
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
43%Average possession46%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
3.57Shots on target / match1.14
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.29Shots per match2.29
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
3.57Shots on target1.14
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
8.6%Shot conversion31.3%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
43%Possession46%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1.18xG for0.49
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.9xG against1.1
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

Shooting quality

LNZ Cherkasy: BalancedKudrivka: Counter-attacking
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
Accuracy (shots on target)43%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.62

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

LNZ Cherkasy is 600% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 0.2 pts / match - Kudrivka

LNZ Cherkasy
WLDWL
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.96Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Kudrivka
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W29% D71% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-5
0.29 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 away
0-1-3
LDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 0.58Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

LNZ Cherkasy is 125% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.14 goals / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 2.57 goals / match - Kudrivka

LNZ Cherkasy scoring profile: mixed

LNZ Cherkasy scores in 29% of matches (2 of 7 matches), while Kudrivka keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

Kudrivka scoring profile: mixed

Kudrivka scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while LNZ Cherkasy keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

5Goals scored (season)5
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
8Goals conceded (season)18
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1.86Average goals in match3.29
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
5Goals scored (last 5)4
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
5Goals conceded (last 5)13
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

How often they score at least...

29%1 goal57%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
29%2 goals14%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
14%3 goals0%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0%4 goals0%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal71%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
29%2 goals71%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
29%3 goals57%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0%4 goals29%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time43%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0%BTTS in both halves14%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
14%Scored in both halves14%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
20%BTTS - last 560%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

29%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

LNZ Cherkasy is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.57 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy · 0.86 pts / match - Kudrivka

LNZ Cherkasy - half-time state
29% leading71% draw0% trailing
Kudrivka - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.57Points per match (1st half)0.86
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.57
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.86
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.57Average goals (1st half)1.43
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
100%Clean sheet before half-time43%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
71%No goal before half-time43%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per match (2nd half)0.43
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
0.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.14
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1.14Goals conceded (2nd half)1.71
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.86
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
43%Clean sheet after half-time29%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka
86%No goal after half-time86%
LNZ CherkasyKudrivka

LNZ Cherkasy - second-half results

14% W29% D57% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.1

Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kudrivka - second-half results

0% W43% D57% L
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

LNZ Cherkasy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+4-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Kudrivka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-7
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

LNZ Cherkasy
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
4
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Kudrivka
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
0
3
46-60
1
4
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
17%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
31%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

LNZ Cherkasy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Kudrivka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
192%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).

Teams vs league

LNZ CherkasyLigaKudrivka
Average goals in match▼ 1.862.34▲ 3.29
Both teams scored▼ 14%39%▲ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 43%46%▲ 71%
Clean sheets▲ 43%38%▼ 29%
Goal before half-time▼ 29%64%▲ 71%
Goal after half-time• 71%71%• 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LNZ CherkasyGoalTalles Brener de Paula
  2. LNZ CherkasyYellow cardArtur Ryabov
  3. LNZ CherkasyYellow cardArtur Ryabov
  4. LNZ CherkasySubstitutionOn: Alexander DrambayevOff: Mark Assinor
  5. LNZ CherkasyGoalGennady Pasich
  6. LNZ CherkasySubstitutionOn: Gennady PasichOff: Tedi Cara
  7. KudrivkaYellow cardDmitro Semenov
  8. KudrivkaGoalRaymond Frimpong OwusuAssist: Mykola Vechurko
  9. LNZ CherkasySubstitutionOn: Andrii KitelaOff: Vitaliy Roman
  10. LNZ CherkasySubstitutionOn: Bohdan SlyubykOff: Papa Ndiaga Yade

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): LNZ Cherkasy 1 - 0 - 1 Kudrivka. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka?

The Ukrainian Premier League match finished LNZ Cherkasy 2:1 Kudrivka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between LNZ Cherkasy and Kudrivka?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches LNZ Cherkasy won 1, Kudrivka won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka?

LNZ Cherkasy score 0.71 goals per game on average and Kudrivka 0.71. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 14% of LNZ Cherkasy's matches and 57% of Kudrivka's.

What form are LNZ Cherkasy and Kudrivka in?

Over the last 5 games LNZ Cherkasy have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kudrivka 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka?

The statistical background for LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.