Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 02 November 2026

Mbarara City vs Vipers: match statistics

Mbarara City crest
Mbarara City
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Vipers crest
Vipers

Mbarara City vs Vipers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mbarara City played Vipers in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 28 October 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Mbarara City: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Vipers: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mbarara City scores 0.33 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Vipers scores 2.17 and concedes 0.33. League average: 2.24 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mbarara City 17%, Vipers 17%. Over 2.5: Mbarara City 17%, Vipers 50%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Vipers has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.42. Mbarara City: 9.8 shots per match, Vipers: 9.3.

Match halves

Mbarara City: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.00. Vipers: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.33.

Goals by minute

Mbarara City: 16-30 (1 goals). Vipers: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.24 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Vipers sit 5th and are unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 3 wins and scoring 13 goals; Mbarara City are 13th and have won just 1 of their last 5 games, scoring 2 goals in that run. Away from home, the visitors have won both of their matches so far, averaging 4.5 goals and conceding none, although such a small sample calls for caution. Mbarara City remain unbeaten at home and have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches, increasing the likelihood of a closely contested game. However, the difference in attacking efficiency is clear: the hosts average 0.67 goals at home and have failed to score in 67% of those matches, while Vipers have scored in every away appearance. The teams' average xG in these conditions is closer—1.43 for the hosts compared with 1.54 for the visitors—but current form and finishing ability point to a Vipers win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest indicator in favor of BTTS - No is Vipers’ effective defense: the visitors have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches so far and conceded an average of just 0.2 goals across their last 5 games. Mbarara City scored only 0.4 goals per game over the same period and failed to score in 50% of their matches this season, making the hosts more likely to finish the match without a goal. Vipers have a clearly stronger attack, averaging 2.6 goals in their last 5 matches compared with Mbarara City’s 0.4. A Goal/Goal outcome cannot be ruled out, as the hosts’ average xG is 1.63 and Vipers allow opponents chances worth an average of 1.31 xG. Even so, BTTS landed in only 20% of each team’s last 5 matches, strengthening the case for BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Vipers have averaged 2.6 goals over their last 5 matches, while Mbarara City have scored just 0.4 goals per game over the same period. The visitors have recently averaged 1.66 xG compared with the hosts’ 1.30 xG, supporting the expectation of an attacking advantage for them, although this does not justify directly extrapolating their scoring average to this match. At least 2 goals have been scored in 100% of Vipers’ matches this season, compared with only 50% of Mbarara City’s, while the league average is 2.12 goals. Therefore, Over 1.5 goals is a stronger pick than Over 2.5: it requires just 2 goals to land, and the projected total is 2.60.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Vipers led at the break in both of their matches so far this season and won both, while Mbarara City were trailing at half-time in 2 of their 4 games. In their last five matches, the visitors went into the break with a lead three times, compared with just once for the hosts, which supports the case for Vipers to lead at half-time. The full-time result also favours the visitors: across their last five appearances, they scored an average of 2.6 goals and conceded 0.2, compared with Mbarara City's 0.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded. Vipers also averaged 1.6 goals after the break over this period, giving them a strong basis to maintain or extend their lead. However, the 2/2 pick still carries some uncertainty, as the visitors' season data covers only two matches and the teams' average xG figures are close: 1.54 for Vipers versus 1.63 for the hosts.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Mbarara CityVipers
5Shots4
Mbarara CityVipers
5Shots on target3
Mbarara CityVipers
1.23xG1.28
Mbarara CityVipers
2Corners10
Mbarara CityVipers
74Dangerous attacks110
Mbarara CityVipers
11Fouls15
Mbarara CityVipers
0Cards0
Mbarara CityVipers

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mbarara CityVipers
0.33Goals scored / match2.17
Mbarara CityVipers
0.83Goals conceded / match0.33
Mbarara CityVipers
49%Average possession65%
Mbarara CityVipers
3.83Shots on target / match4.67
Mbarara CityVipers

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.83Shots per match9.33
Mbarara CityVipers
3.83Shots on target4.67
Mbarara CityVipers
3.4%Shot conversion23.2%
Mbarara CityVipers
49%Possession65%
Mbarara CityVipers
1.42xG for1.6
Mbarara CityVipers
1.24xG against1.03
Mbarara CityVipers

Shooting quality

Mbarara City: BalancedVipers: Efficient finishing
Mbarara CityVipers
Accuracy (shots on target)39%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.090.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vipers is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Mbarara City · 2.2 pts / match - Vipers

Mbarara City
DDLWL
Season result split
17% W33% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-3
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Vipers
WWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W33% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vipers is 558% better for: goals scored per match.

0.33 goals / match - Mbarara City · 2.17 goals / match - Vipers

Vipers is 152% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Mbarara City · 0.33 goals / match - Vipers

Mbarara City scoring profile: more difficult

Mbarara City scores in 17% of matches (1 of 6 matches), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).

Vipers scoring profile: strong

Vipers scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Mbarara City keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

2Goals scored (season)13
Mbarara CityVipers
5Goals conceded (season)2
Mbarara CityVipers
1.17Average goals in match2.5
Mbarara CityVipers
2Goals scored (last 5)13
Mbarara CityVipers
4Goals conceded (last 5)1
Mbarara CityVipers

How often they score at least...

17%1 goal67%
Mbarara CityVipers
17%2 goals50%
Mbarara CityVipers
0%3 goals50%
Mbarara CityVipers
0%4 goals33%
Mbarara CityVipers

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal33%
Mbarara CityVipers
17%2 goals0%
Mbarara CityVipers
0%3 goals0%
Mbarara CityVipers
0%4 goals0%
Mbarara CityVipers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Mbarara CityVipers
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mbarara CityVipers
0%Scored in both halves50%
Mbarara CityVipers

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Mbarara CityVipers
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
Mbarara CityVipers
20%BTTS - last 520%
Mbarara CityVipers

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Mbarara CityVipers
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Mbarara CityVipers
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Mbarara CityVipers

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Mbarara CityVipers
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Mbarara CityVipers
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Mbarara CityVipers

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vipers is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Mbarara City · 1.67 pts / match - Vipers

Mbarara City - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Vipers - half-time state
50% leading17% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.67
Mbarara CityVipers
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.83
Mbarara CityVipers
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Mbarara CityVipers
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.17
Mbarara CityVipers
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Mbarara CityVipers
83%No goal before half-time50%
Mbarara CityVipers

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)2.33
Mbarara CityVipers
0Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
Mbarara CityVipers
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Mbarara CityVipers
0.5Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Mbarara CityVipers
50%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Mbarara CityVipers
100%No goal after half-time33%
Mbarara CityVipers

Mbarara City - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Vipers - second-half results

67% W33% D0% L
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mbarara City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.80.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Vipers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+4+8
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mbarara City
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Vipers
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
11%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
27%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mbarara City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
27%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Vipers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
211%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
27%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mbarara CityLigaVipers
Average goals in match▼ 1.172.24▲ 2.50
Both teams scored▼ 17%38%▼ 17%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 17%41%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 33%39%▲ 67%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%59%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%70%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.24
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
1.03
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Mbarara City 0 - 0 - 2 Vipers. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mbarara City vs Vipers?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Mbarara City 1:0 Vipers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Mbarara City and Vipers?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Mbarara City won 0, Vipers won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Mbarara City vs Vipers?

Mbarara City score 0.33 goals per game on average and Vipers 2.17. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Mbarara City's matches and 17% of Vipers's.

What form are Mbarara City and Vipers in?

Over the last 5 games Mbarara City have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Vipers 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mbarara City vs Vipers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mbarara City vs Vipers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.