MP vs EIF: match statistics
MP vs EIF: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
MP played EIF in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
MP: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. EIF: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
MP scores 1.06 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. EIF scores 1.33 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.46 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: MP 50%, EIF 44%. Over 2.5: MP 44%, EIF 56%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
EIF has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.29. MP: 10.8 shots per match, EIF: 11.2.
Match halves
MP: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.50. EIF: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
MP: 76-90+ (7 goals). EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.46 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
MP have a clear home advantage: they have won 50% of their home matches, while EIF have won just 11% of their away games and lost as many as 67%. The hosts average 1.50 goals at home, whereas the visitors concede 2.33 goals per away match, with a negative goal difference of -12. MP are also more clinical, converting 13% of their shots compared with EIF’s 9%, although both teams produce a similar number of shots on target—around 3.6 per match. EIF’s form over the last five games is slightly better, with 7 points and only 4 goals conceded, but their away trend and poor defensive record throughout the season favour the hosts. A closely contested match is expected, but MP’s greater consistency at home should give them the edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No outcome is more likely, primarily due to EIF’s limited attacking efficiency: the visitors score an average of 1.00 goals per season and only 0.80 in their last five matches. MP keep a clean sheet in 44% of matches, while EIF fail to score in 33% of their appearances, strengthening the scenario in which the home side do not concede. The hosts should, however, have good conditions to find the net, as they average 1.67 goals at home, while EIF concede as many as 2.33 goals per match. EIF’s xG over their last five matches, at 1.66, supports BTTS, but their BTTS rate during this period is only 20%, compared with 80% for MP. MP’s seasonal BTTS percentage is just 33%, below the league average of 43%, which is why the “No” pick has slightly stronger support in the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
MP average 1.67 goals at home, while EIF concede as many as 2.33 goals per away match, which clearly strengthens the hosts’ chances of scoring. Both teams have recorded at least 2 goals in 67% of their league matches, while a minimum of 3 goals was scored in 56% of their games. The xG model also does not point to a tight match: MP’s average xG is 1.44 and EIF’s is 1.39, with a combined projection of 2.70 goals. The strongest signal is Over 1.5, as MP have scored at least once in 78% of their matches, while EIF have conceded in 78% of their appearances, making the scenario of at least two goals clearly more likely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
MP have a clear advantage in their season results: they win 67% of their matches and score an average of 1.67 goals, while EIF win just 11% of their games and concede as many as 2.33 goals per match. The signal for the home side to lead at the break is strong, as MP were ahead at half-time in 4 of 9 matches, while EIF went into the interval trailing in 6 of 9. MP’s defence concedes an average of just 0.11 goals before the break, whereas the visitors allow as many as 1.11 goals in this phase, clearly supporting the 1/1 scenario. Caution is warranted based on the last five matches, in which EIF averaged 1.4 points and conceded only 0.8 goals; however, the long-term quality gap and MP’s first-half advantage still point towards them maintaining their lead until full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| MP | EIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
EIF is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - MP · 1.4 pts / match - EIF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
EIF is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - MP · 1.33 goals / match - EIF
MP is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - MP · 1.67 goals / match - EIF
MP scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).
EIF scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MP
Over / Under - EIF
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MP is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - MP · 1.11 pts / match - EIF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
EIF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
MP
EIF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| MP | Liga | EIF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.39 | 2.46 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 45% | • 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 44% | 45% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 31% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 72% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): MP 1 - 0 - 1 EIF. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of MP vs EIF?
The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 0:2 EIF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between MP and EIF?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches MP won 1, EIF won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before MP vs EIF?
MP score 1.06 goals per game on average and EIF 1.33. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of MP's matches and 44% of EIF's.
What form are MP and EIF in?
Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and EIF 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs EIF?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.