Finland - YkkösliigaMikkelin UrheilupuistoData current as of 03 November 2026

MP vs JIPPO: match statistics

MP crest
MP
1 : 0half-time 1:0
JIPPO crest
JIPPO

MP vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MP played JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

MP: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. JIPPO: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

MP scores 1.09 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. JIPPO scores 1.39 and concedes 0.87. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MP 48%, JIPPO 43%. Over 2.5: MP 43%, JIPPO 39%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

JIPPO has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.38. MP: 11.7 shots per match, JIPPO: 13.5.

Match halves

MP: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.48. JIPPO: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.91.

Goals by minute

MP: 76-90+ (9 goals). JIPPO: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JIPPO sit 4th, while MP are seventh, and the visitors’ overall season record (11 wins and 5 losses) clearly surpasses that of the hosts, who have lost 12 of their 23 matches. The last five games also favor JIPPO: the visitors have collected 9 points and conceded just 5 goals, whereas MP have earned 4 points and conceded 10. Away from home, JIPPO average 1.73 goals per match compared with MP’s 1.18 goals at home, while the visitors’ conversion rate stands at 15% versus 9% for the hosts. JIPPO’s defense also looks more reliable, conceding 1.09 goals per away match and keeping a clean sheet in 36% of games, while MP concede an average of 1.55 goals and record clean sheets in just 18% of matches. MP have a slightly higher home xG of 1.45 compared with JIPPO’s 1.40 away from home, but their weaker recent form and significantly lower conversion rate point to a greater chance of an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - No is driven primarily by MP’s profile: both teams scored in just 33% of their matches, while MP themselves failed to score in 42% of games. JIPPO concede an average of 1.09 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 36% of appearances, increasing the likelihood that the hosts will fail to beat the goalkeeper despite their high xG of 1.87. The visitors should create chances, as they score an average of 1.73 goals, while MP have conceded 2.0 goals per match across their last five games. However, the recent run of both teams produces BTTS in only 40% of matches, compared with a league average of 45%, so the data does not support a scenario in which both sides score. The most likely outcome is that at least one team will fail to score, particularly MP.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals, as MP’s matches finished below this line in 83% of cases, compared with 73% for JIPPO. At home, MP concede an average of just 0.67 goals and keep a clean sheet in 42% of matches, limiting the visitors’ attacking potential despite their average of 1.73 goals scored. JIPPO have a solid defence, conceding an average of 1.09 goals, while MP score only 1.08 goals per home match. Recent form raises the projection to 2.50 goals, as MP conceded 10 goals in their last five appearances, but both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals in only 40% of their last five matches. Additionally, neither team has conceded more than 3 goals in a single match this season, making a scenario with at least four goals clearly less likely.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point, as MP were level at the break in 58% of their matches, while JIPPO recorded a half-time draw in 60% of their last five games. The hosts’ cautious approach is supported by an average of just 0.25 goals scored before the break and clean sheets in 75% of matches at that stage, although their current form is poor: they were trailing at half-time in 80% of their last five games and conceded an average of 2.0 goals during that period. JIPPO have clearly greater potential to secure the full-time result, winning 55% of their matches this season compared with MP’s 42%, while recording three victories in their last five fixtures and averaging 1.6 goals per game. The second half is likely to be decisive, with the visitors averaging 1.6 goals scored across their last five appearances, compared with just 0.4 for MP. Therefore, the HT/FT scenario of a half-time draw followed by a JIPPO win has the strongest foundation.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
MPJIPPO
8Shots11
MPJIPPO
2Shots on target3
MPJIPPO
0.93xG1.42
MPJIPPO
1Corners3
MPJIPPO
38Dangerous attacks72
MPJIPPO
10Fouls9
MPJIPPO
3Cards1
MPJIPPO

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.09Goals scored / match1.39
MPJIPPO
1.48Goals conceded / match0.87
MPJIPPO
51%Average possession54%
MPJIPPO
3.91Shots on target / match5.04
MPJIPPO

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.65Shots per match13.48
MPJIPPO
3.91Shots on target5.04
MPJIPPO
9.3%Shot conversion10.3%
MPJIPPO
51%Possession54%
MPJIPPO
1.38xG for1.65
MPJIPPO
1.55xG against1.09
MPJIPPO

Shooting quality

MP: BalancedJIPPO: Balanced
MPJIPPO
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JIPPO is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - MP · 1.8 pts / match - JIPPO

MP
LLLWD
Season result split
30% W17% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-12
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
JIPPO
LWWLW
Season result split
48% W30% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-5
1.74 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JIPPO is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - MP · 1.39 goals / match - JIPPO

JIPPO is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.48 goals / match - MP · 0.87 goals / match - JIPPO

MP scoring profile: strong

MP scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).

JIPPO scoring profile: very strong

JIPPO scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

25Goals scored (season)32
MPJIPPO
34Goals conceded (season)20
MPJIPPO
2.57Average goals in match2.26
MPJIPPO
6Goals scored (last 5)8
MPJIPPO
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
MPJIPPO

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal70%
MPJIPPO
30%2 goals43%
MPJIPPO
9%3 goals26%
MPJIPPO
0%4 goals0%
MPJIPPO

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal61%
MPJIPPO
39%2 goals17%
MPJIPPO
26%3 goals9%
MPJIPPO
4%4 goals0%
MPJIPPO

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time4%
MPJIPPO
4%BTTS in both halves4%
MPJIPPO
13%Scored in both halves9%
MPJIPPO

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
MPJIPPO
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
MPJIPPO
40%BTTS - last 540%
MPJIPPO

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
MPJIPPO
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
MPJIPPO
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
MPJIPPO

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
MPJIPPO
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
MPJIPPO
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
MPJIPPO

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MP is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.35 pts / match - MP · 1.26 pts / match - JIPPO

MP - half-time state
35% leading30% draw35% trailing
JIPPO - half-time state
26% leading48% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.35Points per match (1st half)1.26
MPJIPPO
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.48
MPJIPPO
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
MPJIPPO
1.35Average goals (1st half)0.91
MPJIPPO
52%Clean sheet before half-time70%
MPJIPPO
57%No goal before half-time70%
MPJIPPO

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.57
MPJIPPO
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
MPJIPPO
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
MPJIPPO
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.35
MPJIPPO
57%Clean sheet after half-time61%
MPJIPPO
61%No goal after half-time52%
MPJIPPO

MP - second-half results

17% W52% D30% L
31
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JIPPO - second-half results

39% W39% D22% L
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match2.00.0
Average goals in match2.80.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%100%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-6+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
JIPPO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.42.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-2+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MP
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
0
6
46-60
2
3
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
5
4
31-45
6
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+66%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

MPLigaJIPPO
Average goals in match• 2.572.56▼ 2.26
Both teams scored▲ 48%44%• 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 43%46%▼ 39%
Clean sheets▼ 22%31%▲ 39%
Goal before half-time▲ 74%65%▼ 57%
Goal after half-time▼ 57%74%▼ 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MPYellow cardAkseli Tervaniemi
  2. JIPPOYellow cardJuho Lehtiranta
  3. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Jyri KiuruOff: Lassi Forss
  4. MPYellow cardSanttu Seppänen
  5. MPSubstitutionOn: Peetu KerminenOff: Akseli Tervaniemi
  6. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Aleksi TarvonenOff: Victor de Paula
  7. MPSubstitutionOn: Santeri SteniusOff: Ebuka Obioha Samson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): MP 0 - 0 - 2 JIPPO. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of MP vs JIPPO?

The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 1:0 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MP and JIPPO?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MP won 0, JIPPO won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MP vs JIPPO?

MP score 1.09 goals per game on average and JIPPO 1.39. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 48% of MP's matches and 43% of JIPPO's.

What form are MP and JIPPO in?

Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and JIPPO 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs JIPPO?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.