MP vs PK-35: match statistics
MP vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
MP played PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
MP: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. PK-35: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
MP scores 1.10 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. PK-35 scores 1.70 and concedes 0.70. League average: 2.48 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: MP 50%, PK-35 40%. Over 2.5: MP 45%, PK-35 45%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
PK-35 has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.35. MP: 11.4 shots per match, PK-35: 11.9.
Match halves
MP: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.45. PK-35: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.10.
Goals by minute
MP: 31-45+ (8 goals). PK-35: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PK-35 sit 2nd, having won 12 of 20 matches and lost only 3, while MP have a record of 6 wins and 11 defeats. The visitors are particularly strong away from home: they win 78% of their matches, score an average of 1.67 goals and concede just 0.11 per game, keeping a clean sheet in 89% of their appearances. At home, MP score an average of 1.33 goals but allow opponents an xG of 1.56 and concede 1.44 goals, creating favourable conditions for PK-35 to exploit their 14% conversion rate. Recent form also favours the visitors, who have averaged 1.6 points and conceded 6 goals across their last five matches, whereas MP have earned 0.8 points per game and allowed opponents to score 11 times. PK-35’s defensive superiority and exceptionally high away efficiency point to the visitors as the most likely winners.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal signal clearly supports the BTTS - No option: PK-35 kept a clean sheet in 89% of matches and had not a single BTTS game, while the league average for BTTS stands at 44%. MP scores 1.73 goals per home game and has an xG of 1.52, but the opponent conceded only 0.11 goals per match on average, significantly limiting the hosts’ chances. PK-35 has an attacking potential of 1.67 goals and an xG of 1.44, but MP keeps a clean sheet in only 18% of matches, making the most realistic scenario an away goal with the hosts failing to score. The last five appearances increase the BTTS risk, as both teams recorded a 60% rate during that period and MP conceded 2.2 goals on average; however, this sample is weaker than PK-35’s very strong full-season defensive profile. The “No” pick has a slight edge because it also covers outcomes where only one team scores, not exclusively a goalless draw.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
PK-35 has a very solid defensive profile in the competition, conceding just 0.11 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 89% of its fixtures. MP does average 1.73 goals at home, but its last five matches produced only 8 goals scored, alongside a lack of stability after conceding 11 goals. The combined xG figures point to a more moderate scenario, with MP averaging 1.52 xG and PK-35 1.44 xG, supporting a projection of around 2.40 goals. On a season-long basis, PK-35 finished below 3.5 goals in as many as 89% of matches, while the figure for MP stands at 64%. This makes Under 3.5 the stronger edge, as even if both teams score, reaching the high threshold of four goals would require a significantly more open game than the visitors' defensive profile suggests.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a PK-35 win, as both teams were level at the break in 44% and 55% of their matches, respectively, while PK-35 conceded an average of just 0.11 goals before half-time. The visitors have been significantly more effective over the season as a whole: they have won 78% of their matches and average 2.44 points per game, compared with MP’s 45% win rate and 1.73 points per match. PK-35’s defence has conceded an average of only 0.11 goals per game and kept a clean sheet in 89% of its appearances, which significantly reduces the hosts’ chances of maintaining a favourable result. After the break, the visitors score an average of 1.11 goals and concede none, whereas MP have scored only 0.2 goals after half-time across their last five matches. Current form also supports the away side: PK-35 have lost only 20% of their last five matches, while MP have lost as many as 60%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| MP | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
PK-35 is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - MP · 1.6 pts / match - PK-35
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PK-35 is 55% better for: goals scored per match.
1.1 goals / match - MP · 1.7 goals / match - PK-35
PK-35 is 114% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - MP · 0.7 goals / match - PK-35
MP scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 matches).
PK-35 scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MP
Over / Under - PK-35
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PK-35 is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - MP · 1.55 pts / match - PK-35
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
PK-35 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 3.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
MP
PK-35
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| MP | Liga | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.60 | 2.48 | • 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 45% | 45% | • 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 31% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 63% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): MP 0 - 0 - 2 PK-35. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of MP vs PK-35?
The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 0:3 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between MP and PK-35?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches MP won 0, PK-35 won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before MP vs PK-35?
MP score 1.10 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.70. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of MP's matches and 40% of PK-35's.
What form are MP and PK-35 in?
Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and PK-35 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs PK-35?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MP vs PK-35: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


