Finland - YkkösliigaMikkelin UrheilupuistoData current as of 03 September 2026

MP vs PK-35: match statistics

MP crest
MP
0 : 3half-time 0:3
PK-35 crest
PK-35

MP vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

MP played PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

MP: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. PK-35: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

MP scores 1.10 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. PK-35 scores 1.70 and concedes 0.70. League average: 2.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MP 50%, PK-35 40%. Over 2.5: MP 45%, PK-35 45%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

PK-35 has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.35. MP: 11.4 shots per match, PK-35: 11.9.

Match halves

MP: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.45. PK-35: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.10.

Goals by minute

MP: 31-45+ (8 goals). PK-35: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PK-35 sit 2nd, having won 12 of 20 matches and lost only 3, while MP have a record of 6 wins and 11 defeats. The visitors are particularly strong away from home: they win 78% of their matches, score an average of 1.67 goals and concede just 0.11 per game, keeping a clean sheet in 89% of their appearances. At home, MP score an average of 1.33 goals but allow opponents an xG of 1.56 and concede 1.44 goals, creating favourable conditions for PK-35 to exploit their 14% conversion rate. Recent form also favours the visitors, who have averaged 1.6 points and conceded 6 goals across their last five matches, whereas MP have earned 0.8 points per game and allowed opponents to score 11 times. PK-35’s defensive superiority and exceptionally high away efficiency point to the visitors as the most likely winners.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal signal clearly supports the BTTS - No option: PK-35 kept a clean sheet in 89% of matches and had not a single BTTS game, while the league average for BTTS stands at 44%. MP scores 1.73 goals per home game and has an xG of 1.52, but the opponent conceded only 0.11 goals per match on average, significantly limiting the hosts’ chances. PK-35 has an attacking potential of 1.67 goals and an xG of 1.44, but MP keeps a clean sheet in only 18% of matches, making the most realistic scenario an away goal with the hosts failing to score. The last five appearances increase the BTTS risk, as both teams recorded a 60% rate during that period and MP conceded 2.2 goals on average; however, this sample is weaker than PK-35’s very strong full-season defensive profile. The “No” pick has a slight edge because it also covers outcomes where only one team scores, not exclusively a goalless draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

PK-35 has a very solid defensive profile in the competition, conceding just 0.11 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 89% of its fixtures. MP does average 1.73 goals at home, but its last five matches produced only 8 goals scored, alongside a lack of stability after conceding 11 goals. The combined xG figures point to a more moderate scenario, with MP averaging 1.52 xG and PK-35 1.44 xG, supporting a projection of around 2.40 goals. On a season-long basis, PK-35 finished below 3.5 goals in as many as 89% of matches, while the figure for MP stands at 64%. This makes Under 3.5 the stronger edge, as even if both teams score, reaching the high threshold of four goals would require a significantly more open game than the visitors' defensive profile suggests.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a PK-35 win, as both teams were level at the break in 44% and 55% of their matches, respectively, while PK-35 conceded an average of just 0.11 goals before half-time. The visitors have been significantly more effective over the season as a whole: they have won 78% of their matches and average 2.44 points per game, compared with MP’s 45% win rate and 1.73 points per match. PK-35’s defence has conceded an average of only 0.11 goals per game and kept a clean sheet in 89% of its appearances, which significantly reduces the hosts’ chances of maintaining a favourable result. After the break, the visitors score an average of 1.11 goals and concede none, whereas MP have scored only 0.2 goals after half-time across their last five matches. Current form also supports the away side: PK-35 have lost only 20% of their last five matches, while MP have lost as many as 60%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
MPPK-35
9Shots11
MPPK-35
2Shots on target4
MPPK-35
1.25xG1.37
MPPK-35
10Corners6
MPPK-35
75Dangerous attacks55
MPPK-35
9Fouls6
MPPK-35
0Cards1
MPPK-35

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.1Goals scored / match1.7
MPPK-35
1.5Goals conceded / match0.7
MPPK-35
50%Average possession44%
MPPK-35
3.95Shots on target / match4.3
MPPK-35

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.4Shots per match11.9
MPPK-35
3.95Shots on target4.3
MPPK-35
9.6%Shot conversion14.3%
MPPK-35
50%Possession44%
MPPK-35
1.35xG for1.48
MPPK-35
1.52xG against1.34
MPPK-35

Shooting quality

MP: BalancedPK-35: Counter-attacking
MPPK-35
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PK-35 is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - MP · 1.6 pts / match - PK-35

MP
DWLLL
Season result split
30% W15% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-11
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
PK-35
DLWDW
Season result split
60% W25% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-3
2.05 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-1-1
Last 5 away
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PK-35 is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - MP · 1.7 goals / match - PK-35

PK-35 is 114% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - MP · 0.7 goals / match - PK-35

MP scoring profile: mixed

MP scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 matches).

PK-35 scoring profile: very strong

PK-35 scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

22Goals scored (season)34
MPPK-35
30Goals conceded (season)14
MPPK-35
2.6Average goals in match2.4
MPPK-35
8Goals scored (last 5)9
MPPK-35
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
MPPK-35

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal80%
MPPK-35
30%2 goals40%
MPPK-35
10%3 goals35%
MPPK-35
0%4 goals10%
MPPK-35

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal50%
MPPK-35
40%2 goals10%
MPPK-35
25%3 goals5%
MPPK-35
5%4 goals5%
MPPK-35

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time10%
MPPK-35
5%BTTS in both halves5%
MPPK-35
10%Scored in both halves30%
MPPK-35

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
MPPK-35
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
MPPK-35
60%BTTS - last 560%
MPPK-35

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
MPPK-35
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
MPPK-35
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
MPPK-35

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
MPPK-35
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
MPPK-35
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
MPPK-35

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PK-35 is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - MP · 1.55 pts / match - PK-35

MP - half-time state
35% leading35% draw30% trailing
PK-35 - half-time state
35% leading50% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)1.55
MPPK-35
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.6
MPPK-35
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
MPPK-35
1.3Average goals (1st half)0.9
MPPK-35
55%Clean sheet before half-time75%
MPPK-35
55%No goal before half-time60%
MPPK-35

After half-time (2nd half)

0.85Points per match (2nd half)1.9
MPPK-35
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)1.1
MPPK-35
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
MPPK-35
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.5
MPPK-35
50%Clean sheet after half-time65%
MPPK-35
65%No goal after half-time30%
MPPK-35

MP - second-half results

10% W55% R35% P
28
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PK-35 - second-half results

50% W40% R10% P
31
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match1.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.80.4
Average goals in match3.20.6
1 goal100%20%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet0%80%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
PK-35 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MP
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
3
4
16-30
8
2
31-45
0
6
46-60
2
3
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

PK-35
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
10
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

PK-35

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

MPLigaPK-35
Average goals in match 2.602.48 2.40
Both teams scored 50%44% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%45% 45%
Clean sheets 20%31% 50%
Goal before half-time 70%63% 55%
Goal after half-time 55%72% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PK-35Yellow cardJasper Pikkuhookana
  2. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Liam LokakeOff: Maximo Tolonen
  3. MPSubstitutionOn: Miko KoivuniemiOff: Santeri Stenius
  4. MPSubstitutionOn: Eero YlönenOff: Akon Kuek
  5. MPSubstitutionOn: Aoi ChishimaOff: Santtu Seppänen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): MP 0 - 0 - 2 PK-35. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of MP vs PK-35?

The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 0:3 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between MP and PK-35?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches MP won 0, PK-35 won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before MP vs PK-35?

MP score 1.10 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.70. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of MP's matches and 40% of PK-35's.

What form are MP and PK-35 in?

Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and PK-35 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs PK-35?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MP vs PK-35: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.