Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 17 October 2026

NEC vs Lugazi Municipal: match statistics

NEC crest
NEC
3 : 1half-time 0:0
Lugazi Municipal crest
Lugazi Municipal

NEC vs Lugazi Municipal: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

NEC played Lugazi Municipal in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 1 September 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

NEC: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Lugazi Municipal: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

NEC scores 2.00 and concedes 0.00 goals per match. Lugazi Municipal scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: NEC 0%, Lugazi Municipal 100%. Over 2.5: NEC 0%, Lugazi Municipal 100%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Lugazi Municipal has higher xG: 2.44 vs 1.18. NEC: 8.0 shots per match, Lugazi Municipal: 23.0.

Match halves

NEC: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00. Lugazi Municipal: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 2.00.

Goals by minute

NEC: 0-15 (1 goals). Lugazi Municipal: 61-75 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 1.56 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

NEC have won 3 of their last 5 matches and collected 9 points during that period, while Lugazi Municipal have recorded just 1 win and 5 points. The hosts have scored 4 goals in five matches, twice as many as their opponents, who have managed just 2 goals. However, Lugazi boast the more solid defensive record, conceding only 2 goals compared with NEC’s 6, which significantly increases the likelihood of a tight, low-scoring contest. NEC sit 12th, while the visitors are 9th, but the hosts’ better run of results and greater attacking efficiency point to a narrow victory. Lugazi’s two draws in their last five appearances mean that a stalemate remains a highly realistic alternative.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal comes from the recent goalscoring form: NEC have scored just 4 goals in their last 5 matches, while Lugazi Municipal have scored only 2, averaging 0.8 and 0.4 goals respectively. BTTS - Yes landed in just 20% of NEC’s last five matches and 0% of Lugazi Municipal’s last five. The visitors have conceded only 2 goals during this period, an average of 0.4 per match, further limiting the hosts’ chances of finishing their attacks successfully. Although Lugazi Municipal’s average xG is 0.97, the team has converted it into just 0.4 goals per match, making it more likely that at least one team will fail to score. Therefore, the recommended market is BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

NEC’s last five matches produced an average of 2.0 goals, while Lugazi Municipal averaged only 0.8 goals per game, clearly lowering the expected goal total. Over this period, the visitors scored just 2 goals and conceded 2, with none of their five matches featuring at least 3 goals. NEC scored 4 goals and conceded 6, with Over 2.5 goals landing in only 20% of their recent matches, while both teams scored in just 20% as well. Although the average xG suggests some attacking potential—1.02 for NEC and 0.97 for Lugazi Municipal—the actual finishing efficiency of both teams was lower. Therefore, Under 3.5 goals has the strongest statistical backing.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: NEC were level at the break in 50% of their recent matches, while Lugazi Municipal did so in as many as 80%. Both teams create little in the first half, with NEC averaging just 0.25 goals and the visitors 0.20, while Lugazi Municipal have conceded no goals before half-time. After the interval, NEC have greater potential, averaging 0.75 goals scored and only 0.25 conceded, whereas their opponents score just 0.20 goals. The hosts have won 60% of their last five matches and collected an average of 1.8 points per game, compared with Lugazi Municipal’s 20% win rate and 1.0 point per game. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by a NEC win, i.e. X/1, best combines the visitors’ cautious start with the hosts’ clear second-half advantage.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
NECLugazi Municipal
10Shots7
NECLugazi Municipal
8Shots on target4
NECLugazi Municipal
1.88xG1.23
NECLugazi Municipal
10Corners6
NECLugazi Municipal
94Dangerous attacks69
NECLugazi Municipal
13Fouls8
NECLugazi Municipal
0Cards0
NECLugazi Municipal

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match2
NECLugazi Municipal
0Goals conceded / match1
NECLugazi Municipal
40%Average possession60%
NECLugazi Municipal
3Shots on target / match6
NECLugazi Municipal

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match23
NECLugazi Municipal
3Shots on target6
NECLugazi Municipal
25%Shot conversion8.7%
NECLugazi Municipal
40%Possession60%
NECLugazi Municipal
1.18xG for2.44
NECLugazi Municipal
1.65xG against2.22
NECLugazi Municipal

Shooting quality

NEC: Counter-attackingLugazi Municipal: Dominant
NECLugazi Municipal
Accuracy (shots on target)38%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.670.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

NEC
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Lugazi Municipal
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.44Opponent xG: 2.22BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NEC scoring profile: very strong

NEC scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Lugazi Municipal keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Lugazi Municipal scoring profile: mixed

Lugazi Municipal scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).

2Goals scored (season)2
NECLugazi Municipal
0Goals conceded (season)1
NECLugazi Municipal
2Average goals in match3
NECLugazi Municipal
2Goals scored (last 5)2
NECLugazi Municipal
0Goals conceded (last 5)1
NECLugazi Municipal

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
NECLugazi Municipal
100%2 goals100%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%3 goals0%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%4 goals0%
NECLugazi Municipal

How often they concede at least...

0%1 goal100%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%2 goals0%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%3 goals0%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%4 goals0%
NECLugazi Municipal

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NECLugazi Municipal
100%Scored in both halves0%
NECLugazi Municipal

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%BTTS - last 5100%
NECLugazi Municipal

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NECLugazi Municipal

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time100%
NECLugazi Municipal

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

NEC is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / match - NEC · 1 pts / match - Lugazi Municipal

NEC - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
Lugazi Municipal - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)1
NECLugazi Municipal
1Goals scored (1st half)0
NECLugazi Municipal
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
NECLugazi Municipal
1Average goals (1st half)0
NECLugazi Municipal
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%No goal before half-time100%
NECLugazi Municipal

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)3
NECLugazi Municipal
1Goals scored (2nd half)2
NECLugazi Municipal
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
NECLugazi Municipal
1Average goals (2nd half)3
NECLugazi Municipal
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
NECLugazi Municipal
0%No goal after half-time0%
NECLugazi Municipal

NEC - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lugazi Municipal - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

NEC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.003.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Lugazi Municipal - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.003.00
Goals scored / match0.02.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.03.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

NEC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Lugazi Municipal
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
160%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.82
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
256%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Lugazi Municipal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
256%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+2.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

NECLigaLugazi Municipal
Average goals in match▲ 2.001.56▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 0%33%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%22%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▲ 100%39%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%56%▼ 0%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%56%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.56
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
0.78
Home goals / match
0.78
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
0%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Richard Basangwa⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NECGoalRichard Basangwa

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): NEC 2 - 0 - 0 Lugazi Municipal. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of NEC vs Lugazi Municipal?

The Uganda Premier League match finished NEC 3:1 Lugazi Municipal. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between NEC and Lugazi Municipal?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches NEC won 2, Lugazi Municipal won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before NEC vs Lugazi Municipal?

NEC score 2.00 goals per game on average and Lugazi Municipal 2.00. The Uganda Premier League average is 1.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 0% of NEC's matches and 100% of Lugazi Municipal's.

What form are NEC and Lugazi Municipal in?

Over the last 5 games NEC have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Lugazi Municipal 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NEC vs Lugazi Municipal?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.