Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 03 November 2026

NEC vs UPDF: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

NEC vs UPDF: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

NEC play UPDF in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 3 November 2026.

Current form

NEC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. UPDF: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

NEC scores 2.00 and concedes 0.56 goals per match. UPDF scores 0.50 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: NEC 44%, UPDF 25%. Over 2.5: NEC 44%, UPDF 25%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

NEC has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.14. NEC: 9.4 shots per match, UPDF: 5.8.

Match halves

NEC: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 1.11. UPDF: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

NEC: 31-45+ (5 goals). UPDF: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.19 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match0.5
NECUPDF
0.56Goals conceded / match0.88
NECUPDF
51%Average possession44%
NECUPDF
4.89Shots on target / match3
NECUPDF

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.44Shots per match5.75
NECUPDF
4.89Shots on target3
NECUPDF
21.2%Shot conversion8.7%
NECUPDF
51%Possession44%
NECUPDF
1.66xG for1.14
NECUPDF
1.39xG against1.24
NECUPDF

Shooting quality

NEC: Efficient finishingUPDF: Balanced
NECUPDF
Accuracy (shots on target)52%52%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

NEC is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - NEC · 1.2 pts / match - UPDF

NEC
DWLWW
Season result split
67% W22% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-1
2.22 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
UPDF
WWLLL
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NEC is 300% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - NEC · 0.5 goals / match - UPDF

NEC is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.56 goals / match - NEC · 0.88 goals / match - UPDF

NEC scoring profile: strong

NEC scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while UPDF keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 matches).

UPDF scoring profile: more difficult

UPDF scores in 38% of matches (3 of 8 matches), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 matches).

18Goals scored (season)4
NECUPDF
5Goals conceded (season)7
NECUPDF
2.56Average goals in match1.38
NECUPDF
9Goals scored (last 5)3
NECUPDF
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
NECUPDF

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal38%
NECUPDF
56%2 goals13%
NECUPDF
33%3 goals0%
NECUPDF
22%4 goals0%
NECUPDF

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal63%
NECUPDF
11%2 goals25%
NECUPDF
0%3 goals0%
NECUPDF
0%4 goals0%
NECUPDF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time13%
NECUPDF
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NECUPDF
44%Scored in both halves0%
NECUPDF

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
NECUPDF
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NECUPDF
40%BTTS - last 520%
NECUPDF

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
NECUPDF
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
NECUPDF
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NECUPDF

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
NECUPDF
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time13%
NECUPDF
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
NECUPDF

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

NEC is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - NEC · 1.38 pts / match - UPDF

NEC - half-time state
56% leading33% draw11% trailing
UPDF - half-time state
25% leading63% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.38
NECUPDF
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.5
NECUPDF
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
NECUPDF
1.22Average goals (1st half)0.75
NECUPDF
67%Clean sheet before half-time75%
NECUPDF
44%No goal before half-time63%
NECUPDF

After half-time (2nd half)

2.11Points per match (2nd half)0.5
NECUPDF
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)0
NECUPDF
0.22Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
NECUPDF
1.33Average goals (2nd half)0.63
NECUPDF
78%Clean sheet after half-time50%
NECUPDF
33%No goal after half-time100%
NECUPDF

NEC - second-half results

56% W44% D0% L
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UPDF - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

NEC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.80
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
UPDF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

NEC
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
0
16-30
5
0
31-45
4
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

UPDF
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-75%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.83
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
174%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

UPDF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

NECLigaUPDF
Average goals in match▲ 2.562.19▼ 1.38
Both teams scored▲ 44%41%▼ 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 44%41%▼ 25%
Clean sheets▲ 56%37%• 38%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%61%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time• 67%68%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.19
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): NEC 1 - 1 - 0 UPDF. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

When do NEC and UPDF play?

NEC face UPDF on 3 November 2026 in Uganda Premier League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between NEC and UPDF?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches NEC won 1, UPDF won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before NEC vs UPDF?

NEC score 2.00 goals per game on average and UPDF 0.50. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 44% of NEC's matches and 25% of UPDF's.

What form are NEC and UPDF in?

Over the last 5 games NEC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and UPDF 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NEC vs UPDF?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.