Negele Arsi Ketema vs Hadiya Hosaena: match statistics
Negele Arsi Ketema vs Hadiya Hosaena: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Negele Arsi Ketema played Hadiya Hosaena in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Negele Arsi Ketema: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Hadiya Hosaena: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Negele Arsi Ketema scores 0.96 and concedes 0.70 goals per match. Hadiya Hosaena scores 0.89 and concedes 1.07. League average: 1.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Negele Arsi Ketema 37%, Hadiya Hosaena 52%. Over 2.5: Negele Arsi Ketema 22%, Hadiya Hosaena 33%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Negele Arsi Ketema has higher xG: 1.18 vs 1.05. Negele Arsi Ketema: 7.2 shots per match, Hadiya Hosaena: 5.8.
Match halves
Negele Arsi Ketema: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.52. Hadiya Hosaena: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Negele Arsi Ketema: 76-90+ (8 goals). Hadiya Hosaena: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.80 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Negele Arsi Ketema sit 2nd in the table while Hadiya Hosaena are 11th; the hosts have scored 26 goals this season versus the visitors’ 24, giving them positional and offensive edge. In attack the hosts create more chances: on average 2.77 shots on target at home and xG 1.10 with 0.92 goals scored, whereas the visitors away register 1.85 shots on target, xG 0.99 and 0.77 goals per match. Defensively the visitors have the advantage: Hadiya concede only 0.69 goals away and keep a clean sheet in 54% of matches, versus 0.77 conceded by the hosts and 38% clean sheets. In the last 5 rounds the hosts are 1W-3D-1L (4 goals scored, 1.2 points per game) and the visitors 1W-2D-2L (5 goals scored, 1.0 point per game), indicating similar form. Considering the higher league position and superiority in chance creation (2.77 shots on target vs 1.85), I give a slight edge to the hosts and tip them to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Negele Arsi Ketema has a season BTTS rate of 71%, while Hadiya Hosaena sits at 31%, but both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches, indicating an increased likelihood of both teams scoring. The home side averages 1.0 goals per game with an xG of 1.11, whereas the visitors concede 0.69 goals on average and have an xG against of 1.31 — the xG comparison 1.11 vs 1.31 suggests Negele has a real chance to score. Conversely, Hadiya keeps a clean sheet in 54% of matches and concedes only 0.69 goals on the season, and the league shows 78% of matches with a clean sheet and an average of 1.79 goals per match, which limits BTTS frequency. In the last 5 matches the home team scored 4 and conceded 5, and the visitors scored 5 and conceded 7, demonstrating both teams’ ability to score and concede. Considering the home advantage in shooting (2.36 shots on target and 16% conversion vs 1.85 and 15% for the opponents), I assign a moderate BTTS - Yes probability of 60%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Home side xG 1.11 and 1.00 goals per match on average; away side xG 0.99 and 0.77 goals on average; xG against 1.43 for home and 1.31 for away, which in a simplified model yields expected 1.21 goals for home and 1.21 for away (total 2.42). Season metrics show home had 86% of matches over 1.5 goals, away 38%; for Over 2.5 it's 50% vs 15%, and Over 3.5 only 14% vs 8%. A Poisson model for total 2.42 gives probability of Over 1.5 about 69.6% (rounded to 70%), Over 2.5 about 43.5% and Over 3.5 about 22.5%. Additionally, home average 6.36 shots and 2.36 on target vs away 5.23 and 1.85, and homes have 71% of matches with BTTS vs 31% for away, which increases chance of at least two goals. Consequently I recommend Over 1.5 as the best line (side: over, line: 1.5) based on the combination of xG (1.11 vs 0.99), seasonal over1.5 rates (86% vs 38%) and the model signal (~70%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario appears to be a half-time draw with an away win at full-time (X/2). Hadiya Hosaena won 46% of matches this season versus just 14% for Negele Arsi Ketema and averages 1.69 points per match compared to 0.79 for the hosts, which gives a clear advantage to the visitors. A draw at the break is common for both teams (the hosts were level at half-time in 50% of matches, the visitors in 54%), so the probability of an X at half-time is around 52%. After the break the visitors are stronger defensively — they concede on average 0.31 goals after half-time and keep a clean sheet in second halves in 85% of cases, while the hosts concede on average 0.57 goals after the break — this increases the likelihood of a turnaround in favor of the visitors after half-time. Additionally, xG is similar (1.11 for the hosts vs 0.99 for the visitors), so the visitors’ points advantage and defensive stability provide the strongest signal for an X/2 outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Negele Arsi Ketema | Hadiya Hosaena | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Negele Arsi Ketema is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Negele Arsi Ketema · 1 pts / match - Hadiya Hosaena
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Negele Arsi Ketema is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
0.96 goals / match - Negele Arsi Ketema · 0.89 goals / match - Hadiya Hosaena
Negele Arsi Ketema is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.7 goals / match - Negele Arsi Ketema · 1.07 goals / match - Hadiya Hosaena
Negele Arsi Ketema scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while Hadiya Hosaena keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
Hadiya Hosaena scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Negele Arsi Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 44% (12 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Negele Arsi Ketema
Over / Under - Hadiya Hosaena
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Negele Arsi Ketema is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.52 pts / match - Negele Arsi Ketema · 0.96 pts / match - Hadiya Hosaena
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Negele Arsi Ketema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Hadiya Hosaena - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Negele Arsi Ketema
Hadiya Hosaena
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Negele Arsi Ketema | Liga | Hadiya Hosaena | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.67 | 1.80 | ▲ 1.96 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 42% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 22% | 28% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 39% | ▼ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 48% | 55% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 63% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Negele Arsi KetemaGoalKitika Jemma
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Negele Arsi Ketema 1 - 0 - 0 Hadiya Hosaena. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Negele Arsi Ketema vs Hadiya Hosaena?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Negele Arsi Ketema 1:1 Hadiya Hosaena. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Negele Arsi Ketema vs Hadiya Hosaena?
Negele Arsi Ketema score 0.96 goals per game on average and Hadiya Hosaena 0.89. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Negele Arsi Ketema's matches and 52% of Hadiya Hosaena's.
What form are Negele Arsi Ketema and Hadiya Hosaena in?
Over the last 5 games Negele Arsi Ketema have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Hadiya Hosaena 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Negele Arsi Ketema vs Hadiya Hosaena?
The statistical background for Negele Arsi Ketema vs Hadiya Hosaena — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


