Paide vs Kuressaare: match statistics
Paide vs Kuressaare: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Paide played Kuressaare in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Venue: Paide linnastaadion. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Paide: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Kuressaare: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Paide scores 1.60 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Kuressaare scores 0.95 and concedes 1.65. League average: 3.11 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Paide 70%, Kuressaare 50%. Over 2.5: Paide 55%, Kuressaare 55%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Paide has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.43. Paide: 13.7 shots per match, Kuressaare: 11.4.
Match halves
Paide: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.80. Kuressaare: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Paide: 31-45+ (6 goals). Kuressaare: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Meistriliiga: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 3-3-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 83%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Paide are the favourites for this match: they sit 4th in the table versus Kuressaare’s 9th position and win 56% of home games, while the visitors have only a 20% away win rate. The hosts display better form — in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, averaging 2.0 points per game, whereas Kuressaare in their last five have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with only 0.8 points per game. In attack Paide score 1.33 goals at home on average versus the visitors’ 1.00 goals away, and defensively the hosts concede 1.00 goal at home versus 1.9 conceded by Kuressaare on the road; the difference in average xG against (1.5 for Paide vs 2.12 for Kuressaare) further indicates greater defensive vulnerability for the visitors. Despite a similar number of attempts (around 12 shots per game and 3–3.7 on target), Paide have higher efficiency (11% conversion vs 8% for Kuressaare) and a substantially lower risk of failing to score (11% FTS vs 40% FTS for the visitors), while the away side have no clean sheets on the road (0% CS). On this basis I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I forecast BTTS - Yes because Kuressaare have no clean sheets (0% clean sheets) and concede on average 1.9 goals per game, while Paide have averaged 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches (10 goals in 5 games). Seasonally Paide score 0.9 goals and have BTTS in 40% of matches, whereas Kuressaare score 1.0 goal and have BTTS in 60% of matches, so historically the greater propensity for BTTS is on Kuressaare’s side. xG and defensive metrics confirm this picture: Paide have xG 1.36 while Kuressaare concede 2.12 xG; conversely Kuressaare have xG 1.50 and Paide concede 1.92 xG, indicating both teams generate approximately 1.3–1.5 xG and are prone to conceding. In the league BTTS occurs in 57% of matches, average goals are 3.11, and over 2.5 stats linked to BTTS are 40% for Paide and 50% for Kuressaare, which further supports a both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering Paide’s form in the last 5 (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss) and Kuressaare’s lack of clean sheets, I rate BTTS 65% vs 35% and pick Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect an open match with at least 2–3 goals: predicted xG is Paide 1.50 and Kuressaare 1.55, totaling 3.05 xG. Season xG are 1.36 (Paide) and 1.50 (Kuressaare), and in the last 5 matches both teams have xG 1.65 and 1.59 (combined 3.24), indicating increased offensive activity. Season percentages for Over 1.5 are 60% for Paide and 80% for Kuressaare (average 70%), so Over 1.5 is very likely. For the 2.5 line we have 50% and 60% on the season and 60% in the last 5 matches with a league average of 66% Over 2.5, therefore I assess Over 2.5 at about 60% and select this line as the best. Over 3.5 has weak backing (20% and 30% on the season, average 25%), so it’s not worth the risk.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Paide led at the break in 30% of their home matches, while Kuressaare were trailing at half-time in 60% of their away games; Paide average 0.5 goals by half-time whereas Kuressaare concede 0.8 on average, which provides a strong signal for the home side to lead at the break (I estimate ~45%). Over the full match Paide have better form and points value: season-long home points average 1.1 versus Kuressaare’s 0.7 per match, and in the last 5 fixtures Paide won 60% while Kuressaare only 20%. It should be noted, however, that the visitors generate higher attacking xG (1.50 versus the home 1.36) and in second halves they earn an average of 1.2 points compared to the home side’s 0.6, which increases the chance of a turnaround after the break. Overall the strongest scenario is Paide leading at half-time and maintaining the win to full-time (1/1) and therefore this outcome received the highest weight (29%); meaningful alternatives are X/1 (14%) and 2/2 (11%), reflecting the visitors’ potential for a second-half comeback.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Paide | Kuressaare | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Paide is 400% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Paide · 0.4 pts / match - Kuressaare
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Paide is 68% better for: goals scored per match.
1.6 goals / match - Paide · 0.95 goals / match - Kuressaare
Paide is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Paide · 1.65 goals / match - Kuressaare
Paide scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while Kuressaare keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 matches).
Kuressaare scores in 50% of matches (10 of 20 matches), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Paide
Over / Under — Kuressaare
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paide is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.55 pts / match - Paide · 0.95 pts / match - Kuressaare
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Paide - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kuressaare - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Paide
Kuressaare
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).
Teams vs league
| Paide | Liga | Kuressaare | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.00 | 3.11 | ▼ 2.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 59% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 67% | ▼ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 23% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 75% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 88% | ▼ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Paide 3 - 3 - 0 Kuressaare. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 83% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Paide vs Kuressaare?
The Meistriliiga match finished Paide 1:0 Kuressaare. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Paide and Kuressaare?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Paide won 3, Kuressaare won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Paide vs Kuressaare?
Paide score 1.60 goals per game on average and Kuressaare 0.95. The Meistriliiga average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Paide's matches and 50% of Kuressaare's.
What form are Paide and Kuressaare in?
Over the last 5 games Paide have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Kuressaare 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paide vs Kuressaare?
The statistical background for Paide vs Kuressaare — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


