Estonia - MeistriliigaPaide linnastaadionData current as of 15 October 2026

Paide vs Tammeka: match statistics

Paide crest
Paide
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Tammeka crest
Tammeka

Paide vs Tammeka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paide played Tammeka in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 14 October 2026. Venue: Paide linnastaadion. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Paide: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Tammeka: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paide scores 1.60 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. Tammeka scores 1.37 and concedes 1.57. League average: 3.10 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paide 63%, Tammeka 47%. Over 2.5: Paide 50%, Tammeka 57%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

Paide has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.56. Paide: 14.7 shots per match, Tammeka: 13.1.

Match halves

Paide: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.93. Tammeka: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Paide: 76-90+ (12 goals). Tammeka: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Meistriliiga: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 6-0-1. Average goals 2.43, BTTS 14%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Paide have the home advantage: they have won 57% of their home matches, while Tammeka have lost 47% of their away fixtures. The hosts concede an average of 1 goal per game at home, compared with 2 for the visitors away from home, which could prove decisive given the similar number of chances created. The teams’ average xG figures are comparable—1.78 for Paide and 1.73 for Tammeka—but the hosts convert shots into goals more often (10% versus 9%). In their last five matches, Paide recorded 3 wins and conceded 5 goals, while Tammeka won twice and conceded 13. This defensive disparity points to a Paide win, although the visitors’ attacking potential means an upset cannot be ruled out.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is marginally more likely, as Paide average 1.21 goals at home, while Tammeka concede 2.00 goals per away match. The visitors also have a case for scoring: they average 1.33 goals away from home and generate an xG of 1.73, while Paide allow opponents an xG of 1.62. Over their last 5 matches, both teams averaged 1.6 goals scored, although Tammeka conceded as many as 2.6 goals per match, which particularly strengthens the hosts' chances of finding the net. However, the signal is not decisive: the season-long rate of matches in which both teams scored is 50% for Paide and 47% for Tammeka, so the lean towards BTTS - Yes remains moderate.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 73% of Tammeka’s matches and 57% of Paide’s. Tammeka concede an average of 2.0 goals per match and have shipped 13 goals in their last five fixtures, boosting the hosts’ chances of getting on the scoresheet. The visitors can also contribute, having created chances worth an average of 1.73 xG, while Paide allow opponents 1.62 xG. The combined forecast stands at 3.15 goals, close to the league average of 3.14, but higher lines are less reliable: Over 2.5 goals has landed in 50% of Paide’s matches and 60% of Tammeka’s.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal in favor of Paide leading at the break is their recent form: the hosts were ahead at half-time in 3 of their 5 matches, while Tammeka were trailing at that point in 3 of their 5 games. During this period, the visitors conceded an average of 1.4 goals before the break, compared with just 0.2 for Paide, increasing the likelihood of an early home lead. Paide’s second-half record this season also supports them holding on to that lead: they score an average of 0.86 goals and concede 0.43, while Tammeka score 0.53 and concede 0.60. In their last five matches, the visitors conceded an average of 2.6 goals per game, compared with 1.0 for Paide, making a home win appear more likely. However, this is not a certain pick: Paide were level at half-time in 50% of their matches this season, so a draw at the break followed by a home win remains a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
PaideTammeka
13Shots13
PaideTammeka
3Shots on target6
PaideTammeka
1.64xG1.66
PaideTammeka
4Corners3
PaideTammeka
84Dangerous attacks57
PaideTammeka
11Fouls9
PaideTammeka
3Cards3
PaideTammeka

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match1.37
PaideTammeka
1.23Goals conceded / match1.57
PaideTammeka
54%Average possession50%
PaideTammeka
4.83Shots on target / match4.7
PaideTammeka

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.67Shots per match13.1
PaideTammeka
4.83Shots on target4.7
PaideTammeka
10.9%Shot conversion10.4%
PaideTammeka
54%Possession50%
PaideTammeka
1.76xG for1.56
PaideTammeka
1.6xG against1.62
PaideTammeka

Shooting quality

Paide: AttackingTammeka: Balanced
PaideTammeka
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Paide is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Paide · 1.2 pts / match - Tammeka

Paide
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W20% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-6-9
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-5
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.98Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Tammeka
LWLLW
Season result split
50% W7% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-2-13
1.57 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-1-7
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paide is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Paide · 1.37 goals / match - Tammeka

Paide is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.23 goals / match - Paide · 1.57 goals / match - Tammeka

Paide scoring profile: very strong

Paide scores in 87% of matches (26 of 30 matches), while Tammeka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

Tammeka scoring profile: very strong

Tammeka scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).

48Goals scored (season)41
PaideTammeka
37Goals conceded (season)47
PaideTammeka
2.83Average goals in match2.93
PaideTammeka
8Goals scored (last 5)8
PaideTammeka
4Goals conceded (last 5)12
PaideTammeka

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal73%
PaideTammeka
47%2 goals40%
PaideTammeka
20%3 goals20%
PaideTammeka
7%4 goals3%
PaideTammeka

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal67%
PaideTammeka
30%2 goals37%
PaideTammeka
10%3 goals27%
PaideTammeka
3%4 goals13%
PaideTammeka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time30%
PaideTammeka
7%BTTS in both halves3%
PaideTammeka
40%Scored in both halves27%
PaideTammeka

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
PaideTammeka
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
PaideTammeka
40%BTTS - last 540%
PaideTammeka

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
PaideTammeka
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
PaideTammeka
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time30%
PaideTammeka

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
PaideTammeka
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
PaideTammeka
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
PaideTammeka

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paide is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Paide · 1.1 pts / match - Tammeka

Paide - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing
Tammeka - half-time state
23% leading40% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.1
PaideTammeka
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.63
PaideTammeka
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)1.07
PaideTammeka
1.2Average goals (1st half)1.7
PaideTammeka
67%Clean sheet before half-time40%
PaideTammeka
47%No goal before half-time57%
PaideTammeka

After half-time (2nd half)

1.73Points per match (2nd half)1.67
PaideTammeka
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
PaideTammeka
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
PaideTammeka
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.23
PaideTammeka
47%Clean sheet after half-time63%
PaideTammeka
27%No goal after half-time43%
PaideTammeka

Paide - second-half results

50% W23% D27% L
45
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tammeka - second-half results

43% W37% D20% L
33
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding217%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Paide - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Tammeka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.0
Average goals in match2.21.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paide
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
8
7
16-30
6
3
31-45
9
2
46-60
7
8
61-75
12
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tammeka
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
10
14
16-30
9
12
31-45
5
2
46-60
6
6
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paide

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Tammeka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).

Teams vs league

PaideLigaTammeka
Average goals in match▼ 2.833.10▼ 2.93
Both teams scored▲ 63%57%▼ 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%64%▼ 57%
Clean sheets• 23%23%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%76%▼ 73%
Goal after half-time▲ 93%88%▼ 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.10
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TammekaYellow cardHerman Pedmanson
  2. TammekaYellow cardMoussa Felix Sambe
  3. TammekaSubstitutionOn: Laurits ÕunpuuOff: Herman Pedmanson
  4. PaideSubstitutionOn: Kristofer PihtOff: Dawda Darboe
  5. PaideYellow cardDaniel Luts
  6. TammekaYellow cardMoussa Felix Sambe
  7. TammekaSubstitutionOn: Robin Mathias MüürOff: Romet Silov
  8. PaideSubstitutionOn: Aleksandr ŠurõginOff: Martin Miller
  9. PaideYellow cardPa Abdou Cham

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Paide 6 - 0 - 1 Tammeka. Average goals 2.43, both teams scored in 14% matches.

Tammeka
0 : 2
Paide
Paide
0 : 1
Tammeka
Tammeka
1 : 4
Paide
Paide Linnameeskond
5 : 0
JK Tammeka Tartu
JK Tammeka Tartu
0 : 1
Paide Linnameeskond
JK Tammeka Tartu
0 : 2
Paide Linnameeskond
Paide Linnameeskond
1 : 0
JK Tammeka Tartu

FAQ

What was the result of Paide vs Tammeka?

The Meistriliiga match finished Paide 2:1 Tammeka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Paide and Tammeka?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Paide won 6, Tammeka won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.43 goals, with both teams scoring in 14% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Paide vs Tammeka?

Paide score 1.60 goals per game on average and Tammeka 1.37. The Meistriliiga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Paide's matches and 47% of Tammeka's.

What form are Paide and Tammeka in?

Over the last 5 games Paide have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Tammeka 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paide vs Tammeka?

The statistical background for Paide vs Tammeka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.