Hungary - NB IData current as of 15 October 2026

Paksi SE vs MTK: match statistics

Paksi SE crest
Paksi SE
3 : 0half-time 1:0
MTK crest
MTK

Paksi SE vs MTK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paksi SE played MTK in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Paksi SE: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. MTK: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paksi SE scores 2.00 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. MTK scores 1.88 and concedes 1.75. League average: 3.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paksi SE 75%, MTK 88%. Over 2.5: Paksi SE 63%, MTK 88%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Paksi SE has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.73. Paksi SE: 13.6 shots per match, MTK: 13.3.

Match halves

Paksi SE: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 1.00. MTK: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.13.

Goals by minute

Paksi SE: 46-60 (5 goals). MTK: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-0. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Paksi SE have a slight home advantage: they average 2.5 goals per match at home with an xG of 2.24, while MTK average 2 goals and an xG of 1.57 away from home. The hosts average 16.75 shots at home, compared with 10.67 for the visitors away, suggesting more chances for Paksi despite MTK’s higher shot conversion rate (19% vs. 15%). Paksi’s case is also strengthened by the recent head-to-head record: they have won three of the last five meetings, compared with two wins for MTK. However, the risk of a draw remains significant, as all three of MTK’s away matches so far have ended level. Both teams concede an average of 2 goals per match in these circumstances, so Paksi’s edge in chance creation does not guarantee a win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams score regularly: Paksi SE average 1.8 goals and MTK 2.0, with neither side having failed to score in any match so far. BTTS has landed in 80% of the home side’s matches and 100% of the away side’s, well above the league average of 66%. The defensive numbers further support goals at both ends: Paksi concede an average of 1.6 goals, while MTK concede 2.0, and the visitors have yet to keep a clean sheet. In their last five matches, both teams averaged 1.6 goals per game, with average xG of 2.03 and 1.81 respectively, confirming their potential to create chances. Although BTTS in the home side’s matches fell to 60% over this period, it remained at 80% for the visitors, making BTTS - Yes the most likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Paksi average 1.8 goals scored and 1.6 conceded at home, while MTK average 2.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded away, pointing to scoring potential on both sides. In Paksi’s home matches and MTK’s away matches so far, the 1.5-goal line has been exceeded in 100% of cases. The xG figures also support further goals: Paksi average 1.82 xG against 1.72 conceded by MTK, while MTK average 1.57 xG against 1.38 conceded by the hosts. The Over 2.5 goals line also looks promising, but it has landed in 100% of Paksi’s home matches and 67% of MTK’s away games, making Over 1.5 goals the clearly stronger pick. The forecast of 3.60 total goals supports this assessment, though it does not determine the outcome of any single match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: Paksi SE were level at the break in 3 of the 5 included home matches, while MTK were level in 3 of their last 5 games. The hosts average just 0.4 goals before half-time, although MTK average 1.33 goals in that period, so an away lead at the break cannot be ruled out. After the break, the advantage shifts towards Paksi SE, who average 1.4 goals compared with MTK's 0.67 and won the second half in 60% of the included home matches. Recent results support this: the hosts averaged 2.0 points across five matches, compared with the visitors' 1.4, while their xG stands at 1.82 versus MTK's 1.57. Therefore, the scenario of a draw at half-time followed by a home win at full-time has the strongest backing in the data.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Paksi SEMTK
20Shots8
Paksi SEMTK
7Shots on target2
Paksi SEMTK
2.39xG1.17
Paksi SEMTK
6Corners4
Paksi SEMTK
90Dangerous attacks71
Paksi SEMTK
13Fouls15
Paksi SEMTK
3Cards3
Paksi SEMTK

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.88
Paksi SEMTK
2.13Goals conceded / match1.75
Paksi SEMTK
49%Average possession52%
Paksi SEMTK
6.5Shots on target / match7.13
Paksi SEMTK

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.63Shots per match13.25
Paksi SEMTK
6.5Shots on target7.13
Paksi SEMTK
14.7%Shot conversion14.2%
Paksi SEMTK
49%Possession52%
Paksi SEMTK
1.88xG for1.73
Paksi SEMTK
1.57xG against1.51
Paksi SEMTK

Shooting quality

Paksi SE: Efficient finishingMTK: Efficient finishing
Paksi SEMTK
Accuracy (shots on target)48%54%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Paksi SE is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Paksi SE · 1 pts / match - MTK

Paksi SE
LWDLW
Season result split
38% W25% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-3
1.38 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 at home
2-1-1
WDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.95Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
MTK
DWDLL
Season result split
25% W38% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-3
1.13 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 away
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paksi SE is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Paksi SE · 1.88 goals / match - MTK

MTK is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.13 goals / match - Paksi SE · 1.75 goals / match - MTK

Paksi SE scoring profile: very strong

Paksi SE scores in 100% of matches (8 of 8 matches), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 100% of matches (8 of 8 matches), while Paksi SE keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).

16Goals scored (season)15
Paksi SEMTK
17Goals conceded (season)14
Paksi SEMTK
4.13Average goals in match3.63
Paksi SEMTK
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Paksi SEMTK
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
Paksi SEMTK

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Paksi SEMTK
75%2 goals63%
Paksi SEMTK
13%3 goals25%
Paksi SEMTK
13%4 goals0%
Paksi SEMTK

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal88%
Paksi SEMTK
63%2 goals63%
Paksi SEMTK
38%3 goals25%
Paksi SEMTK
25%4 goals0%
Paksi SEMTK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time50%
Paksi SEMTK
25%BTTS in both halves13%
Paksi SEMTK
38%Scored in both halves38%
Paksi SEMTK

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Paksi SEMTK
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Paksi SEMTK
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Paksi SEMTK

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Paksi SEMTK
63%Min. 2 goals before half-time63%
Paksi SEMTK
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Paksi SEMTK

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Paksi SEMTK
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Paksi SEMTK
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Paksi SEMTK

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MTK is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / match - Paksi SE · 1.25 pts / match - MTK

Paksi SE - half-time state
13% leading50% draw38% trailing
MTK - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per match (1st half)1.25
Paksi SEMTK
1Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Paksi SEMTK
1.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
Paksi SEMTK
2.25Average goals (1st half)1.63
Paksi SEMTK
50%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Paksi SEMTK
38%No goal before half-time38%
Paksi SEMTK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.63
Paksi SEMTK
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
Paksi SEMTK
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Paksi SEMTK
1.88Average goals (2nd half)2
Paksi SEMTK
38%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Paksi SEMTK
25%No goal after half-time25%
Paksi SEMTK

Paksi SE - second-half results

25% W63% D13% L
7
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding292%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MTK - second-half results

50% W13% D38% L
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Paksi SE - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
MTK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paksi SE
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
5
0
46-60
1
3
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

MTK
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
3
46-60
4
1
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
121%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
82%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paksi SE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

Paksi SELigaMTK
Average goals in match▲ 4.133.20▲ 3.63
Both teams scored▲ 75%67%▲ 88%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 63%61%▲ 88%
Clean sheets▲ 25%18%▼ 13%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%67%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 88%82%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per match
67%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MTKYellow cardVilius Armalas
  2. Paksi SEGoalÁkos KinyikAssist: János Szabó
  3. Paksi SEYellow cardBalász Balogh
  4. Paksi SEYellow cardJános Szabó
  5. Paksi SESubstitutionOn: Kevin HorváthOff: Balász Balogh
  6. MTKSubstitutionOn: Benedek VarjuOff: Vilius Armalas
  7. Paksi SEGoalKevin HorváthAssist: Barna Tóth
  8. Paksi SEYellow cardBarna Tóth
  9. MTKYellow cardSoma Szuhodovszki
  10. Paksi SESubstitutionOn: Gergő GyurkitsOff: Jozsef Windecker
  11. Paksi SEGoalMilan PetőAssist: Barna Tóth
  12. MTKYellow cardBenedek Varju

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Paksi SE 3 - 0 - 0 MTK. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Paksi SE vs MTK?

The NB I match finished Paksi SE 3:0 MTK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Paksi SE and MTK?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Paksi SE won 3, MTK won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Paksi SE vs MTK?

Paksi SE score 2.00 goals per game on average and MTK 1.88. The NB I average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Paksi SE's matches and 88% of MTK's.

What form are Paksi SE and MTK in?

Over the last 5 games Paksi SE have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and MTK 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paksi SE vs MTK?

The statistical background for Paksi SE vs MTK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.