Lithuania - A LygaPanevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionasData current as of 16 October 2026

Panevėžys vs Banga: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Panevėžys vs Banga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Panevėžys play Banga in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match date is 17 October 2026. Venue: Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas.

Current form

Panevėžys: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Banga: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Panevėžys scores 1.07 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Banga scores 1.37 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.65 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Panevėžys 48%, Banga 37%. Over 2.5: Panevėžys 52%, Banga 43%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Banga has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.26. Panevėžys: 10.4 shots per match, Banga: 12.4.

Match halves

Panevėžys: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.45. Banga: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Panevėžys: 31-45+ (10 goals). Banga: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 4-3-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 43%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(3.00)
(3.35)
(2.17)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.07Goals scored / match1.37
PanevėžysBanga
1.52Goals conceded / match0.93
PanevėžysBanga
46%Average possession47%
PanevėžysBanga
3.72Shots on target / match4.23
PanevėžysBanga

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.45Shots per match12.43
PanevėžysBanga
3.72Shots on target4.23
PanevėžysBanga
10.2%Shot conversion11%
PanevėžysBanga
46%Possession47%
PanevėžysBanga
1.26xG for1.44
PanevėžysBanga
1.69xG against1.28
PanevėžysBanga

Shooting quality

Panevėžys: BalancedBanga: Balanced
PanevėžysBanga
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Panevėžys is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Panevėžys · 1 pts / match - Banga

Panevėžys
LWWWL
Season result split
34% W17% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-14
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.96BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Banga
DDLLW
Season result split
43% W27% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-8-9
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Banga is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - Panevėžys · 1.37 goals / match - Banga

Banga is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Panevėžys · 0.93 goals / match - Banga

Panevėžys scoring profile: strong

Panevėžys scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Banga keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).

Banga scoring profile: strong

Banga scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 matches).

31Goals scored (season)41
PanevėžysBanga
44Goals conceded (season)28
PanevėžysBanga
2.59Average goals in match2.3
PanevėžysBanga
8Goals scored (last 5)4
PanevėžysBanga
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
PanevėžysBanga

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal63%
PanevėžysBanga
31%2 goals43%
PanevėžysBanga
10%3 goals20%
PanevėžysBanga
0%4 goals7%
PanevėžysBanga

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal63%
PanevėžysBanga
38%2 goals20%
PanevėžysBanga
24%3 goals10%
PanevėžysBanga
10%4 goals0%
PanevėžysBanga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
PanevėžysBanga
7%BTTS in both halves3%
PanevėžysBanga
17%Scored in both halves27%
PanevėžysBanga

BTTS and goal count

34%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
PanevėžysBanga
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
PanevėžysBanga
20%BTTS - last 540%
PanevėžysBanga

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
PanevėžysBanga
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
PanevėžysBanga
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
PanevėžysBanga

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
PanevėžysBanga
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
PanevėžysBanga
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
PanevėžysBanga

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Panevėžys is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / match - Panevėžys · 1.27 pts / match - Banga

Panevėžys - half-time state
41% leading24% draw34% trailing
Banga - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per match (1st half)1.27
PanevėžysBanga
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.57
PanevėžysBanga
0.72Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
PanevėžysBanga
1.34Average goals (1st half)1.03
PanevėžysBanga
52%Clean sheet before half-time60%
PanevėžysBanga
52%No goal before half-time63%
PanevėžysBanga

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.63
PanevėžysBanga
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
PanevėžysBanga
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
PanevėžysBanga
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.27
PanevėžysBanga
45%Clean sheet after half-time60%
PanevėžysBanga
66%No goal after half-time47%
PanevėžysBanga

Panevėžys - second-half results

24% W34% D41% L
43
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 34%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Banga - second-half results

47% W23% D30% L
38
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding159%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Banga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
9
0-15
6
5
16-30
10
7
31-45
6
6
46-60
0
6
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Banga
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
8
2
16-30
4
9
31-45
8
3
46-60
6
3
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.59
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Banga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

PanevėžysLigaBanga
Average goals in match• 2.592.65▼ 2.30
Both teams scored• 48%47%▼ 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 52%53%▼ 43%
Clean sheets▼ 21%32%▲ 37%
Goal before half-time▲ 79%69%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 76%78%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Panevėžys 4 - 3 - 0 Banga. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 43% matches.

Banga
0 : 3
Panevėžys
Panevėžys
1 : 0
Banga
Banga
0 : 1
Panevėžys
FK Banga Gargždai
2 : 2
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 0
FK Banga Gargždai
FK Banga Gargždai
1 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 1
FK Banga Gargždai

FAQ

When do Panevėžys and Banga play?

Panevėžys face Banga on 17 October 2026 in A Lyga at Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Panevėžys and Banga?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Panevėžys won 4, Banga won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Panevėžys vs Banga?

Panevėžys score 1.07 goals per game on average and Banga 1.37. The A Lyga average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Panevėžys's matches and 37% of Banga's.

What form are Panevėžys and Banga in?

Over the last 5 games Panevėžys have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Banga 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panevėžys vs Banga?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.