Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk: match statistics
Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Patro Eisden played Beerschot-Wilrijk in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 23 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Patro Eisden: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Beerschot-Wilrijk: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Patro Eisden scores 1.38 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Beerschot-Wilrijk scores 1.63 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Patro Eisden 50%, Beerschot-Wilrijk 56%. Over 2.5: Patro Eisden 47%, Beerschot-Wilrijk 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Beerschot-Wilrijk has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.67. Patro Eisden: 14.9 shots per match, Beerschot-Wilrijk: 15.6.
Match halves
Patro Eisden: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.81. Beerschot-Wilrijk: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (12 goals). Beerschot-Wilrijk: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beerschot-Wilrijk are clear favorites: the visitors have 19 wins this season versus Patro Eisden’s 14 and a significantly better goal difference 52-31 (+21) compared to 44-40 (+4). In the last 5 matches Beerschot won 4 and scored 14 goals (2.8 per match) and averages 2.6 points per game, while Patro has 2 wins, 7 goals (1.4 per match) and 1.4 points per match. Away, Beerschot has a 63% win rate, scores 1.69 and concedes 1.00 per game with 44% clean sheets, whereas Patro at home wins 50% of fixtures, scores 1.44 and concedes 1.38 per match. The visitors also dominate possession (52% vs 39%), xG_for 1.79 versus the hosts’ 1.61 and have a lower share of goalless games (13% vs 25%), indicating superior control and offensive efficiency from Beerschot. Considering the stable run of 4 consecutive wins, better attacking and defensive metrics and possession edge, I forecast a victory for the visitors, although a draw remains possible.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS at 66% (Yes) vs 34% (No) due to prevailing offensive signals from both teams. Patro Eisden averages 1.56 goals scored and concedes 0.94 per match, while Beerschot-Wilrijk scores 1.69 and concedes 1.00; season BTTS rates are 63% for the home side and 50% for the away, against a league average of 55%, supporting Goal/Goal. In the last 5 matches Beerschot scored 14 goals (2.8 per match), whereas Patro conceded 8 goals (1.6 per match), and the teams’ xG are nearly identical (1.78 vs 1.79), confirming chance creation. A counterpoint is the higher clean sheet expected percentage for the visitors (44% vs 31% for home) and Patro’s lower BTTS in the last 5 matches (40%), but the visitors’ offensive edge and similar xG lead me to favor BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have high season rates of matches over 1.5 goals: Patro Eisden 75% and Beerschot‑Wilrijk 75%, while the league average is 2.82 goals per game, indicating a tendency toward scoring. Based on xG I estimate expected goals as the average of attack and opponent’s defense: (1.78 + 1.41)/2 ≈ 1.60 for the home side and (1.79 + 1.27)/2 ≈ 1.53 for the visitors, totaling about 3.13 goals. In the last 5 matches Beerschot scored 14 goals (2.8 avg) and Patro 7 goals (1.4 avg), and both teams have BTTS rates of 63% and 50% respectively, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Season-long over 2.5 rates are 50% for both teams, but in the last 5 matches it’s 60% (home) and 80% (away), so I assess Over 2.5 at approximately 66%. The strongest and most reliable signal is the 1.5 line (75%/75% plus xG≈3.13), therefore I recommend playing OVER 1.5 as the best choice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal comes from the away side's form: Beerschot led at the break in 60% of their last 5 matches and scored an average of 1.6 goals by half-time versus 0.2 for Patro Eisden. Over the season the away team collects on average 2.06 points per match compared to 1.94 for the home side, and in the last 5 matches they won 80% of games versus 40% for the hosts, which increases the probability of an eventual away victory. In the second half the visitors also perform better — averaging 1.94 points and winning 56% of second halves versus 1.5 points and 38% for the home team, with a high proportion of matches featuring goals after the break (88% for the away side, 81% for the hosts). Despite nearly identical xG (1.78 vs 1.79), these figures make the scenario of the visitors leading at the break and winning the match (2/2) the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Patro Eisden | Beerschot-Wilrijk | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 2.6 pts / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.63 goals / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 0.97 goals / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk
Patro Eisden scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while Beerschot-Wilrijk keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).
Beerschot-Wilrijk scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Patro Eisden
Over / Under - Beerschot-Wilrijk
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beerschot-Wilrijk is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.66 pts / match - Beerschot-Wilrijk
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Patro Eisden - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Beerschot-Wilrijk - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Patro Eisden
Beerschot-Wilrijk
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Patro Eisden | Liga | Beerschot-Wilrijk | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.63 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 54% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 26% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 66% | 71% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 79% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Patro Eisden 1 - 0 - 1 Beerschot-Wilrijk. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk?
The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 1:1 Beerschot-Wilrijk. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Patro Eisden and Beerschot-Wilrijk?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Patro Eisden won 1, Beerschot-Wilrijk won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk?
Patro Eisden score 1.38 goals per game on average and Beerschot-Wilrijk 1.63. The First Division B average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Patro Eisden's matches and 56% of Beerschot-Wilrijk's.
What form are Patro Eisden and Beerschot-Wilrijk in?
Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Beerschot-Wilrijk 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Patro Eisden vs Beerschot-Wilrijk: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.