Picerno vs Catania: match statistics
Picerno vs Catania: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Picerno played Catania in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match was played on 15 September 2026. Venue: Stadio Comunale Donato Curcio. Final score: 2:4.
Current form
Picerno: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match. Catania: 1-0-3, 0.75 points/match.
Goal statistics
Picerno scores 2.25 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Catania scores 1.50 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.05 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Picerno 50%, Catania 50%. Over 2.5: Picerno 50%, Catania 75%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Picerno has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.47. Picerno: 13.5 shots per match, Catania: 10.3.
Match halves
Picerno: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.25. Catania: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Picerno: 76-90+ (3 goals). Catania: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group C: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Picerno are unbeaten in the league, with 3 wins and a 9:3 goal record, while they have scored 12 goals and collected 13 points in their last five matches. At home, the hosts have won both games, averaging 3.5 goals from 6.5 shots on target per match, with a solid xG of 1.78. Catania have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, including their only away fixture to date, and are yet to score on the road while conceding an average of 2 goals. Although the visitors average 59% possession away from home, this translates into just 8 shots and 4 shots on target, so Picerno’s superior efficiency should give them a clear advantage. The hosts’ defence is not flawless, allowing opponents an xG of 1.59, which gives Catania a limited chance of securing a draw, but the main scenario remains a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Picerno has strong attacking potential at home: they average 2.5 goals, generate an xG of 1.56, and record 5.5 shots on target per match. However, the key argument against BTTS - Yes is Catania, who have yet to score in their away data, have a 0% scoring rate, and have not recorded a single match in which they scored. The visitors’ BTTS rate is 0%, while Picerno keep a clean sheet in 50% of their home matches. Catania’s last five games provide a slightly more positive signal, as the team averaged 1.0 goal with an xG of 1.65, but they also lost four of those five matches and conceded as many as 1.8 goals per game. The more likely scenario is therefore that Picerno will exploit their opponents’ defensive weaknesses, while at least one team—most notably Catania—will fail to score. This supports BTTS - No, which means that at least one team does not score; it does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Picerno are in excellent attacking form: they have averaged 2.4 goals in their last 5 matches, while they have scored 2.5 goals per game in their home fixtures so far. Catania have conceded an average of 1.8 goals in their last five appearances, which clearly strengthens the prospect of at least two goals from the hosts or an open game. The 1.5 line has been surpassed in 100% of both teams’ matches to date, while the league average stands at a high 3.1 goals. Picerno have averaged 1.63 xG in their last five matches, while Catania, despite their weaker results, have generated 1.65 xG and could therefore also contribute to the goals. Over 1.5 is the safest choice, as it combines the line’s perfect historical hit rate with a projected 2.90 goals in the match.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Picerno are in significantly better form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals and conceding just 1.0, while Catania have lost 4 of their last 5 games and conceded an average of 1.8 goals. The hosts were leading at the break in 40% of their last five matches, whereas Catania were trailing at half-time in 80% of theirs, scoring an average of just 0.2 goals in the first halves. Picerno’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances: their average xG is 1.56 compared with 1.22 for their opponents, and they record 5.5 shots on target per match versus Catania’s 4.0. After the break, the hosts have scored an average of 1.4 goals in their last five appearances and won the second half in 80% of those matches, which favours maintaining or extending their lead. The most likely HT/FT outcome is therefore 1/1, with Picerno taking the lead before half-time and securing the win by full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Picerno | Catania | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Picerno is 200% better for: last-5 form.
2.25 pts / match - Picerno · 0.75 pts / match - Catania
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Picerno is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
2.25 goals / match - Picerno · 1.5 goals / match - Catania
Picerno is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Picerno · 1.5 goals / match - Catania
Picerno scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Catania keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
Catania scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Picerno keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Picerno
Over / Under - Catania
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Picerno is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Picerno · 0.75 pts / match - Catania
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Picerno - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Catania - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.75 | 2.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.75 | 1.75 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 50% |
| No goal | 75% | 25% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Picerno
Catania
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Picerno | Liga | Catania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.25 | 3.05 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 24% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | • 75% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Picerno 1 - 0 - 1 Catania. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Picerno vs Catania?
The Serie C Group C match finished Picerno 2:4 Catania. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Picerno and Catania?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Picerno won 1, Catania won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Picerno vs Catania?
Picerno score 2.25 goals per game on average and Catania 1.50. The Serie C Group C average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Picerno's matches and 50% of Catania's.
What form are Picerno and Catania in?
Over the last 5 games Picerno have a 3-0-1 record (2.25 points per game) and Catania 1-0-3 (0.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Picerno vs Catania?
The statistical background for Picerno vs Catania — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


