Finland - YkkösliigaMustapekka AreenaData current as of 06 September 2026

PK-35 vs JäPS: match statistics

PK-35 crest
PK-35
3 : 0half-time 2:0
JäPS crest
JäPS

PK-35 vs JäPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PK-35 played JäPS in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 21 August 2026. Venue: Mustapekka Areena. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

PK-35: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. JäPS: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

PK-35 scores 1.63 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. JäPS scores 0.95 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.46 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PK-35 42%, JäPS 26%. Over 2.5: PK-35 42%, JäPS 42%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

PK-35 has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.20. PK-35: 11.8 shots per match, JäPS: 9.5.

Match halves

PK-35: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.11. JäPS: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

PK-35: 76-90+ (10 goals). JäPS: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.46 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 2.40, BTTS 20%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PK-35 sit 2nd, while JäPS are fifth, and over the course of the season the hosts have won 11 of 19 matches, suffering just 3 defeats. At home, PK-35 average 1.6 goals and create chances worth 1.54 xG, clearly outperforming JäPS away from home, where the averages stand at 0.89 goals and 1.12 xG. The visitors struggle for consistency on the road: they have lost 56% of their away fixtures, concede an average of 1.78 goals, and fail to score in 33% of such matches. However, JäPS have tightened up defensively in their last five games, conceding only 3 goals, with a record of 3 wins and 2 defeats, which increases the likelihood of a closely contested match. Despite this, PK-35 average 12 shots at home, including 4.5 on target, compared with JäPS’s 9.22 attempts and 3 shots on target, so the hosts should have the better chance of securing a win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to a scenario in which at least one side fails to score: PK-35 recorded BTTS in only 10% of their matches this season and kept a clean sheet in 60% of games. JäPS average just 0.89 goals per match, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of their last five appearances, despite averaging 1.0 goal scored. The home side are the favourites to find the net, as JäPS concede an average of 1.78 goals and their average xG allowed to opponents stands at a high 1.80. At the same time, the visitors’ defence has recently improved to just 0.6 goals conceded per match, increasing the likelihood of a 1:0 result or another win in which one team fails to score. PK-35’s 60% BTTS rate in their recent matches supports a goal for JäPS, but the hosts’ clearly weaker season data and the visitors’ low attacking efficiency favour BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to a moderate number of goals: PK-35 score an average of 1.00 goal, while JäPS score 0.89, with the league average standing at 2.45 goals per match. However, the hosts have a favorable attacking matchup, as their average xG is 1.26, while JäPS allow opponents 1.80 xG per game. On the other hand, JäPS have conceded only 0.60 goals per match in their last five games, and PK-35 have kept a clean sheet in 60% of their matches this season, which limits the projection for the away side's goals. The 3.5 line is particularly well protected, as PK-35 matches have finished below it in 90% of cases and JäPS matches in 67%; therefore, the edge is with Under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

PK-35 has a clearer home profile: they have won 60% of their matches, scoring 1.0 goal per game and conceding just 1.0, while JäPS have lost 56% of their matches and allowed opponents an average of 1.78 goals. The hosts have more frequently taken the lead at the break, doing so in 5 of 10 matches (50%), compared with 2 of 9 for JäPS (22%). Their first-half defence is particularly solid, conceding an average of 0.2 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 80% of matches, while the visitors failed to score in the first half in 67% of their appearances. PK-35’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances: the hosts create an average of 1.26 xG, compared with the 1.80 xG allowed by JäPS, and register 3.8 shots on target versus their opponents’ 3.0. JäPS’s recent form, with 3 wins in 5 matches and just 0.6 goals conceded per game, increases the chances of a draw or a turnaround, but the most likely individual outcome remains PK-35 leading at half-time and maintaining that advantage through full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

35Possession (%)65
PK-35JäPS
14Shots13
PK-35JäPS
6Shots on target4
PK-35JäPS
1.55xG1.36
PK-35JäPS
5Corners6
PK-35JäPS
35Dangerous attacks36
PK-35JäPS
4Fouls15
PK-35JäPS
0Cards2
PK-35JäPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.63Goals scored / match0.95
PK-35JäPS
0.74Goals conceded / match1.37
PK-35JäPS
44%Average possession44%
PK-35JäPS
4.21Shots on target / match3.42
PK-35JäPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.79Shots per match9.53
PK-35JäPS
4.21Shots on target3.42
PK-35JäPS
13.8%Shot conversion9.9%
PK-35JäPS
44%Possession44%
PK-35JäPS
1.48xG for1.2
PK-35JäPS
1.34xG against1.58
PK-35JäPS

Shooting quality

PK-35: Counter-attackingJäPS: Balanced
PK-35JäPS
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

JäPS is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - PK-35 · 1.8 pts / match - JäPS

PK-35
WDLWD
Season result split
58% W26% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-3
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
JäPS
WWLWL
Season result split
47% W5% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-1-9
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PK-35 is 72% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - PK-35 · 0.95 goals / match - JäPS

PK-35 is 85% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.74 goals / match - PK-35 · 1.37 goals / match - JäPS

PK-35 scoring profile: strong

PK-35 scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 47% (9 of 19 matches).

JäPS scoring profile: mixed

JäPS scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 47% (9 of 19 matches).

31Goals scored (season)18
PK-35JäPS
14Goals conceded (season)26
PK-35JäPS
2.37Average goals in match2.32
PK-35JäPS
7Goals scored (last 5)5
PK-35JäPS
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
PK-35JäPS

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal68%
PK-35JäPS
37%2 goals21%
PK-35JäPS
32%3 goals5%
PK-35JäPS
11%4 goals0%
PK-35JäPS

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal53%
PK-35JäPS
11%2 goals37%
PK-35JäPS
5%3 goals21%
PK-35JäPS
5%4 goals16%
PK-35JäPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
PK-35JäPS
5%BTTS in both halves0%
PK-35JäPS
26%Scored in both halves11%
PK-35JäPS

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
PK-35JäPS
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
PK-35JäPS
60%BTTS - last 520%
PK-35JäPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
PK-35JäPS
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
PK-35JäPS
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
PK-35JäPS

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
PK-35JäPS
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
PK-35JäPS
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
PK-35JäPS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PK-35 - half-time state
32% leading53% draw16% trailing
JäPS - half-time state
37% leading42% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.53
PK-35JäPS
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.53
PK-35JäPS
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
PK-35JäPS
0.84Average goals (1st half)0.84
PK-35JäPS
74%Clean sheet before half-time68%
PK-35JäPS
63%No goal before half-time58%
PK-35JäPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.84Points per match (2nd half)1.16
PK-35JäPS
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
PK-35JäPS
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)1.05
PK-35JäPS
1.53Average goals (2nd half)1.47
PK-35JäPS
63%Clean sheet after half-time53%
PK-35JäPS
32%No goal after half-time63%
PK-35JäPS

PK-35 - second-half results

47% W42% R11% P
28
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding181%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JäPS - second-half results

26% W37% R37% P
29
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PK-35 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
JäPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PK-35
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
9
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

JäPS
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
0
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
7
61-75
2
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.34
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PK-35

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

JäPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

PK-35LigaJäPS
Average goals in match 2.372.46 2.32
Both teams scored 42%44% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%44% 42%
Clean sheets 47%31% 47%
Goal before half-time 53%63% 63%
Goal after half-time 74%72% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.46
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JäPSGoalJesse Nikki
  2. JäPSYellow cardJesse Nikki
  3. JäPSYellow cardVeka Ketonen
  4. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Herkko KuosaOff: Emil Pallas
  5. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Liam LokakeOff: Emu Kawakita
  6. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Irfan SadikOff: Ayuub Ahmed-Nur
  7. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Reza HeidariOff: Oscar Dahlfors
  8. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Jermu VirtanenOff: Julius Salo
  9. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Aleksi SainioOff: Henrik Ölander

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): PK-35 3 - 1 - 1 JäPS. Average goals 2.40, both teams scored in 20% matches.

JäPS
0 : 5
PK-35
JäPS
1 : 0
PK-35
Pallokerho-35 ry
0 : 0
Järvenpään Palloseura
Järvenpään Palloseura
1 : 4
Pallokerho-35 ry
Pallokerho-35 ry
1 : 0
Järvenpään Palloseura

FAQ

What was the result of PK-35 vs JäPS?

The Ykkösliiga match finished PK-35 3:0 JäPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PK-35 and JäPS?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches PK-35 won 3, JäPS won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PK-35 vs JäPS?

PK-35 score 1.63 goals per game on average and JäPS 0.95. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 42% of PK-35's matches and 26% of JäPS's.

What form are PK-35 and JäPS in?

Over the last 5 games PK-35 have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and JäPS 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PK-35 vs JäPS?

The statistical background for PK-35 vs JäPS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.