Qingdao Jonoon vs Wuhan Three Towns: match statistics
Qingdao Jonoon vs Wuhan Three Towns: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Qingdao Jonoon played Wuhan Three Towns in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Qingdao Tiantai Stadium. Final score: 1:5.
Current form
Qingdao Jonoon: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Wuhan Three Towns: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Qingdao Jonoon scores 1.33 and concedes 1.92 goals per match. Wuhan Three Towns scores 1.36 and concedes 1.73. League average: 3.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Qingdao Jonoon 67%, Wuhan Three Towns 64%. Over 2.5: Qingdao Jonoon 58%, Wuhan Three Towns 50%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Wuhan Three Towns has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.36. Qingdao Jonoon: 12.7 shots per match, Wuhan Three Towns: 12.8.
Match halves
Qingdao Jonoon: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.79. Wuhan Three Towns: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Qingdao Jonoon: 76-90+ (8 goals). Wuhan Three Towns: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Qingdao Jonoon have home advantage, winning 45% of their matches on home soil and averaging 1.55 goals, but their current form is alarming: they have lost their last five games, scoring just 2 goals in the process. Wuhan Three Towns have lost only once in their last five appearances, recording 3 draws and a 6:6 goal difference, which stands in clear contrast to the hosts’ run. However, the visitors have not won a single away game this season, while as many as 55% of their matches on the road have ended in draws, making it difficult to confidently back them for victory. Qingdao create slightly better chances at home, with an average xG of 1.39 compared with Wuhan’s 1.22 away from home, but both teams have defensive problems and rarely keep clean sheets. A draw appears to be the most likely outcome, probably with both teams scoring.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is strengthened by Wuhan Three Towns’ very weak defence: the team concedes an average of 2.27 goals per match and has not kept a single clean sheet this season. Qingdao Jonoon create chances worth an average of 1.61 xG at home, attempt 14.91 shots per match and should exploit their opponents’ defensive vulnerability despite averaging just 0.4 goals scored across their last five matches. The visitors have recorded BTTS in 82% of their matches, while Qingdao have conceded 10 goals in their last five fixtures—2.0 per match—which clearly boosts Wuhan’s chances of scoring. The hosts’ attacking form reduces confidence in the pick; however, the combination of the visitors’ zero clean sheets and Wuhan’s 60% BTTS rate in their last five matches gives a slight edge to the BTTS - Yes scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The Over 1.5 goals line is strongly supported by seasonal trends: at least two goals were scored in 73% of Qingdao Jonoon matches and in as many as 91% of Wuhan Three Towns fixtures. Wuhan have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches, while their average of 2.27 goals conceded away from home clearly supports the hosts to score. However, Qingdao have been in weaker scoring form, averaging just 0.4 goals per match over their last five outings, which is why Over 2.5 does not carry the same clear edge despite the hosts’ high xG of 1.61. The visitors have recently created chances worth an average of 1.61 xG, while Qingdao conceded 2.0 goals per game during this period, raising the projection for the away side to 1.38 goals. The combined projection of 2.60 goals indicates a strong safety margin for Over 1.5, whereas a four-goal or higher outcome remains less likely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is Wuhan Three Towns leading at the break and the match ending in a draw, as the visitors have been ahead at half-time in 60% of their last five matches, without losing a single half-time result. Qingdao Jonoon are in a clear slump: they have lost all five of their most recent matches, scoring just 0.4 goals per game and going into half-time behind in as many as 60% of cases. Season-long first-half data still favour the hosts, but current form reverses this picture, with Wuhan having conceded no goals before the break in their last five appearances, while Qingdao conceded an average of 1.0 goal during that period. After the interval, however, the likelihood of an equaliser increases: Wuhan have drawn the second half in 45% of their league matches, while as many as 55% of their games overall have ended in draws, despite the team still not having recorded a win. The hosts also have greater long-term potential, with an xG of 1.61 compared with the opponents' 1.22, supporting the possibility of recovering from a one-goal deficit, but not guaranteeing a complete turnaround.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Qingdao Jonoon | Wuhan Three Towns | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wuhan Three Towns is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.92 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.73 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns
Qingdao Jonoon scores in 71% of matches (17 of 24 matches), while Wuhan Three Towns keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).
Wuhan Three Towns scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Qingdao Jonoon keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qingdao Jonoon
Over / Under - Wuhan Three Towns
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wuhan Three Towns is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.32 pts / match - Wuhan Three Towns
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qingdao Jonoon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wuhan Three Towns - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Qingdao Jonoon
Wuhan Three Towns
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Qingdao Jonoon | Liga | Wuhan Three Towns | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.25 | 3.10 | • 3.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 64% | • 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 58% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 20% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 88% | ▼ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Qingdao Jonoon 2 - 0 - 1 Wuhan Three Towns. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Qingdao Jonoon vs Wuhan Three Towns?
The Chinese Super League match finished Qingdao Jonoon 1:5 Wuhan Three Towns. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Qingdao Jonoon and Wuhan Three Towns?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Qingdao Jonoon won 2, Wuhan Three Towns won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Qingdao Jonoon vs Wuhan Three Towns?
Qingdao Jonoon score 1.33 goals per game on average and Wuhan Three Towns 1.36. The Chinese Super League average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Qingdao Jonoon's matches and 64% of Wuhan Three Towns's.
What form are Qingdao Jonoon and Wuhan Three Towns in?
Over the last 5 games Qingdao Jonoon have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Wuhan Three Towns 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qingdao Jonoon vs Wuhan Three Towns?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Qingdao Jonoon vs Wuhan Three Towns: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


