Racing vs Cerro Largo: match statistics
Racing vs Cerro Largo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Racing played Cerro Largo in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Venue: Parque Osvaldo Roberto. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Racing: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Cerro Largo: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Racing scores 1.24 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Cerro Largo scores 0.94 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.38 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Racing 44%, Cerro Largo 41%. Over 2.5: Racing 32%, Cerro Largo 29%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Racing has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.24. Racing: 12.4 shots per match, Cerro Largo: 9.5.
Match halves
Racing: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. Cerro Largo: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Racing: 76-90+ (11 goals). Cerro Largo: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.38 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing have a clear home advantage: they have won 59% of their home matches, while Cerro Largo have lost 53% of their away games. The hosts average 1.47 goals scored and 0.71 conceded at home, whereas the visitors score just 0.71 goals and concede 1.29 on the road. The difference in chance quality is reflected in the xG figures: Racing generate 1.56 xG at home, while Cerro Largo concede 1.55 xG away. In addition, the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 53% of their home matches, and the visitors have failed to score in 47% of their away games. However, the last five matches do not give Racing a form edge—both teams have recorded one win, one draw and three losses—so a draw remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest indicator that at least one team will fail to score is Cerro Largo’s attack: the visitors average 0.71 goals per match and have failed to score in 47% of their games. Racing concede an average of 0.94 goals, further reducing the visitors’ chances of scoring. Both teams have scored in 47% of Racing’s matches and just 35% of Cerro Largo’s, both below the league average of 50%. Across their last 5 matches, the visitors averaged 0.8 goals, while their xG fell to 0.79; Racing, meanwhile, averaged 1.4 goals. Although Racing have recently conceded 1.6 goals per match, Cerro Largo’s weaker finishing makes BTTS - No—the outcome in which at least one team fails to score—the more likely pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to under 3.5 goals: this outcome occurred in 88% of Racing’s matches and in 88% of Cerro Largo’s matches as well. The hosts average 1.18 goals scored and 0.94 conceded, while the visitors score just 0.71 and concede 1.29. The visitors’ limited attacking potential is further reflected in the fact that they failed to score in 47% of their matches and averaged 0.8 goals across their last five. Although Racing’s last five matches averaged 3.0 total goals, only 20% of Cerro Largo’s recent games went over 2.5 goals; therefore, the projected total of 2.20 goals supports under 3.5 more convincingly than the more demanding under 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: across their last five matches, both teams averaged just 0.2 first-half goals, and neither led at the break even once. Over the season, Racing were drawing at half-time in 41% of their matches, compared with 29% for Cerro Largo, so this scenario is far from certain, but the recent form of both sides lends it support. After the break, the advantage shifts towards the home side, who average 0.88 goals in the second half compared with the visitors’ 0.35, while Cerro Largo concede an average of 0.71 goals after half-time. Racing have also scored 10 goals between the 76th and 90th minutes, while Cerro Largo have conceded six in that period, further supporting the X/1 HT/FT pick. Risk remains significant, as both teams have earned just 0.8 points per game across their last five matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Racing | Cerro Largo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing is 32% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - Racing · 0.94 goals / match - Cerro Largo
Racing is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.88 goals / match - Racing · 1.12 goals / match - Cerro Largo
Racing scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Cerro Largo keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 34 matches).
Cerro Largo scores in 62% of matches (21 of 34 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 41% (14 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing
Over / Under - Cerro Largo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - Racing · 1.06 pts / match - Cerro Largo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Cerro Largo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Racing
Cerro Largo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Racing | Liga | Cerro Largo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.12 | 2.38 | ▼ 2.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 50% | ▼ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 44% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 29% | ▼ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 67% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 73% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Racing 2 - 2 - 0 Cerro Largo. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing vs Cerro Largo?
The Primera División match finished Racing 3:1 Cerro Largo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Racing and Cerro Largo?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Racing won 2, Cerro Largo won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Cerro Largo?
Racing score 1.24 goals per game on average and Cerro Largo 0.94. The Primera División average is 2.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Racing's matches and 41% of Cerro Largo's.
What form are Racing and Cerro Largo in?
Over the last 5 games Racing have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Cerro Largo 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Cerro Largo?
The statistical background for Racing vs Cerro Largo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


