Austria - Bundesligajosko ARENAData current as of 30 August 2026

Ried vs Grazer AK: match statistics

Ried crest
Ried
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Grazer AK crest
Grazer AK

Ried vs Grazer AK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ried played Grazer AK in Bundesliga (Austria). The match was played on 21 August 2026. Venue: josko ARENA. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Ried: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match. Grazer AK: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ried scores 1.00 and concedes 2.33 goals per match. Grazer AK scores 0.67 and concedes 4.00. League average: 2.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ried 100%, Grazer AK 33%. Over 2.5: Ried 67%, Grazer AK 100%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Ried has higher xG: 1.85 vs 0.95. Ried: 15.7 shots per match, Grazer AK: 8.7.

Match halves

Ried: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33. Grazer AK: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Ried: 0-15 (1 goals). Grazer AK: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Bundesliga: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ried have a clear advantage in the home data: they average 2.17 xG and 18 shots per match, while Grazer AK generate just 0.66 xG and 6.5 shots away from home. The visitors are yet to score in away fixtures, failing to find the net in 100% of such matches and conceding an average of as many as 5.5 goals. Grazer AK’s defence allows opponents 3.03 xG away from home, which should favour the hosts, who have scored in every home game. Ried also have defensive issues, conceding an average of 2 goals at home and keeping no clean sheets, so the prospect of a goal for the visitors remains realistic. Grazer AK’s stronger recent form, with 3 wins in 5 matches compared to Ried’s 1 victory, reduces confidence in the pick, but the visitors’ extremely poor away numbers still point towards the home side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Grazer AK’s very poor away record: the team averages 0.0 goals, has an xG of just 0.66, and failed to score in 100% of these matches. Ried are clearly more dangerous in attack, averaging 2.0 goals, 1.52 xG, and 6.0 shots on target per match, while the visitors’ defense concedes as many as 5.5 goals with 3.03 xG allowed to opponents. However, Grazer AK’s last five matches offer some hope of a breakthrough, as the team averaged 1.8 goals scored, while Ried conceded 2.2 goals per game. Despite this, Grazer AK’s BTTS rate is only 0% in the current away data and 20% across their last five appearances, compared with the league average of 44%. Therefore, a Ried win with a clean sheet is more likely than both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Ried’s last five matches produced an average of 3.8 goals, while Grazer AK’s games averaged as many as 4.2 goals, clearly exceeding the league average of 2.78. The Over 2.5 goals line landed in 80% of Ried’s last five matches and in 100% of Grazer AK’s games during this period. The hosts averaged 1.6 goals scored, while Grazer AK conceded 2.4; meanwhile, the visitors scored 1.8 goals per game, with Ried conceding 2.2. The quality of chances also supports a goals market: Ried generate an average of 1.52 xG, while Grazer AK’s defence allows opponents 3.03 xG. Over 1.5 goals remains the strongest pick, as both teams have recorded at least two total goals in every match so far this season, while their current form points to even greater scoring potential.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Ried taking the lead at the break and maintaining their winning position: the hosts score an average of 2.0 goals in their home matches, while Grazer AK concede as many as 5.5 goals away from home. Ried have won 100% of their matches at home so far and led at half-time in every one of them, whereas the visitors were behind at the break in both away fixtures, conceding an average of 3.5 goals before half-time. The quality-of-chances advantage is also clear, with Ried averaging 1.52 xG compared with just 0.66 for Grazer AK, while the hosts record an average of 6.0 shots on target against 1.5 for their opponents. Grazer AK’s last five matches look better in terms of results, but their away defensive record and failure to score on the road suggest that the 1/1 scenario remains the most likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
RiedGrazer AK
17Shots15
RiedGrazer AK
3Shots on target3
RiedGrazer AK
1.69xG1.38
RiedGrazer AK
7Corners4
RiedGrazer AK
57Dangerous attacks31
RiedGrazer AK
15Fouls10
RiedGrazer AK
3Cards4
RiedGrazer AK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0.67
RiedGrazer AK
2.33Goals conceded / match4
RiedGrazer AK
52%Average possession42%
RiedGrazer AK
6Shots on target / match3
RiedGrazer AK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.67Shots per match8.67
RiedGrazer AK
6Shots on target3
RiedGrazer AK
6.4%Shot conversion7.7%
RiedGrazer AK
52%Possession42%
RiedGrazer AK
1.85xG for0.95
RiedGrazer AK
1.54xG against2.55
RiedGrazer AK

Shooting quality

Ried: AttackingGrazer AK: Balanced
RiedGrazer AK
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grazer AK is 203% better for: last-5 form.

0.33 pts / match - Ried · 1 pts / match - Grazer AK

Ried
DLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.3xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 67%
Grazer AK
LWL
Season result split
33% W0% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 4.0xG: 0.95Opponent xG: 2.55BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ried is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Ried · 0.67 goals / match - Grazer AK

Ried is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.33 goals / match - Ried · 4 goals / match - Grazer AK

Ried scoring profile: very strong

Ried scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Grazer AK keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Grazer AK scoring profile: strong

Grazer AK scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Ried keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

3Goals scored (season)2
RiedGrazer AK
7Goals conceded (season)12
RiedGrazer AK
3.33Average goals in match4.67
RiedGrazer AK
3Goals scored (last 5)2
RiedGrazer AK
7Goals conceded (last 5)12
RiedGrazer AK

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal33%
RiedGrazer AK
0%2 goals33%
RiedGrazer AK
0%3 goals0%
RiedGrazer AK
0%4 goals0%
RiedGrazer AK

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
RiedGrazer AK
67%2 goals67%
RiedGrazer AK
33%3 goals67%
RiedGrazer AK
33%4 goals33%
RiedGrazer AK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

67%BTTS at half-time0%
RiedGrazer AK
0%BTTS in both halves0%
RiedGrazer AK
0%Scored in both halves33%
RiedGrazer AK

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
RiedGrazer AK
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS67%
RiedGrazer AK
100%BTTS - last 533%
RiedGrazer AK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
RiedGrazer AK
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
RiedGrazer AK
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
RiedGrazer AK

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
RiedGrazer AK
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
RiedGrazer AK
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
RiedGrazer AK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grazer AK is 203% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.33 pts / match - Ried · 1 pts / match - Grazer AK

Ried - half-time state
0% leading33% draw67% trailing
Grazer AK - half-time state
33% leading0% draw67% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.33Points per match (1st half)1
RiedGrazer AK
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.33
RiedGrazer AK
1.67Goals conceded (1st half)2.33
RiedGrazer AK
2.33Average goals (1st half)2.67
RiedGrazer AK
0%Clean sheet before half-time33%
RiedGrazer AK
33%No goal before half-time67%
RiedGrazer AK

After half-time (2nd half)

0.67Points per match (2nd half)0.33
RiedGrazer AK
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
RiedGrazer AK
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.67
RiedGrazer AK
1Average goals (2nd half)2
RiedGrazer AK
33%Clean sheet after half-time0%
RiedGrazer AK
67%No goal after half-time67%
RiedGrazer AK

Ried - second-half results

0% W67% R33% P
1
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.33
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grazer AK - second-half results

0% W33% R67% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.7

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ried - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.330.67
Goals scored / match0.70.3
Goals conceded / match1.70.7
Average goals in match2.31.0
1 goal100%67%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals33%0%
Clean sheet0%33%
No goal33%67%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 33% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 67% - Half-time goals total: 2
Grazer AK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.33
Goals scored / match0.30.3
Goals conceded / match2.31.7
Average goals in match2.72.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals67%67%
3 goals33%33%
Clean sheet33%0%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference-6-4
Half-time: 33% leading - 0% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 33% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ried
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
3
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Grazer AK
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
144%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ried

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.85
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
233%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Grazer AK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
225%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

RiedLigaGrazer AK
Average goals in match 3.332.78 4.67
Both teams scored 100%44% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%50% 100%
Clean sheets 0%28% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%72% 100%
Goal after half-time 67%78% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+78%
Home attack advantage
+44%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
11%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Grazer AKYellow cardYannick Oberleitner
  2. Grazer AKYellow cardAnderson dos Santos Gomes
  3. Grazer AKYellow cardPeter Michorl
  4. RiedYellow cardNiama Pape Sissoko
  5. Grazer AKYellow cardBeres Owusu
  6. RiedSubstitutionOn: Martin RasnerOff: Yussef Nasrawe
  7. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Mark GrosseOff: Christian Lichtenberger
  8. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Souleyman MandeyOff: Peter Michorl
  9. RiedSubstitutionOn: Dejan RadonjicOff: Ante Bajic
  10. RiedYellow cardTino Kusanovic

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Ried 1 - 2 - 1 Grazer AK. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ried vs Grazer AK?

The Bundesliga match finished Ried 1:0 Grazer AK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ried and Grazer AK?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Ried won 1, Grazer AK won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ried vs Grazer AK?

Ried score 1.00 goals per game on average and Grazer AK 0.67. The Bundesliga average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Ried's matches and 33% of Grazer AK's.

What form are Ried and Grazer AK in?

Over the last 5 games Ried have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Grazer AK 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ried vs Grazer AK?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.