Latvia - VirsligaSporta komplekss ĶeizarmežsData current as of 07 September 2026

Riga vs Auda: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Riga vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga play Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 11 September 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs.

Current form

Riga: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Auda: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga scores 3.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Auda scores 1.61 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.97 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga 59%, Auda 50%. Over 2.5: Riga 85%, Auda 46%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Riga has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.67. Riga: 17.1 shots per match, Auda: 14.0.

Match halves

Riga: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.48. Auda: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Riga: 76-90+ (19 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 6-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 71%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3Goals scored / match1.61
RigaAuda
1Goals conceded / match0.96
RigaAuda
63%Average possession60%
RigaAuda
6.44Shots on target / match4.68
RigaAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.15Shots per match13.96
RigaAuda
6.44Shots on target4.68
RigaAuda
17.5%Shot conversion11.5%
RigaAuda
63%Possession60%
RigaAuda
2.03xG for1.67
RigaAuda
0.97xG against1.08
RigaAuda

Shooting quality

Riga: DominantAuda: Balanced
RigaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)38%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.470.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Riga · 2.6 pts / match - Auda

Riga
WWWDL
Season result split
74% W19% R7% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-5-2
2.41 pts / match · goal difference +54
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-2-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.05Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Auda
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
61% W18% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-5-6
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 0.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 86% better for: goals scored per match.

3 goals / match - Riga · 1.61 goals / match - Auda

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 96% of matches (26 of 27 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 89% of matches (25 of 28 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 41% (11 of 27 matches).

81Goals scored (season)45
RigaAuda
27Goals conceded (season)27
RigaAuda
4Average goals in match2.57
RigaAuda
16Goals scored (last 5)7
RigaAuda
8Goals conceded (last 5)1
RigaAuda

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal89%
RigaAuda
89%2 goals43%
RigaAuda
67%3 goals14%
RigaAuda
33%4 goals4%
RigaAuda

How often they concede at least...

59%1 goal57%
RigaAuda
26%2 goals25%
RigaAuda
15%3 goals11%
RigaAuda
0%4 goals4%
RigaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time21%
RigaAuda
11%BTTS in both halves0%
RigaAuda
59%Scored in both halves32%
RigaAuda

BTTS and goal count

59%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
RigaAuda
26%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
RigaAuda
80%BTTS - last 520%
RigaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
RigaAuda
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
RigaAuda
37%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
RigaAuda

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
RigaAuda
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
RigaAuda
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
RigaAuda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.15 pts / match - Riga · 1.64 pts / match - Auda

Riga - half-time state
67% leading15% draw19% trailing
Auda - half-time state
43% leading36% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.15Points per match (1st half)1.64
RigaAuda
1.52Goals scored (1st half)0.75
RigaAuda
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
RigaAuda
2.04Average goals (1st half)1.25
RigaAuda
59%Clean sheet before half-time64%
RigaAuda
22%No goal before half-time39%
RigaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

2.07Points per match (2nd half)1.61
RigaAuda
1.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
RigaAuda
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
RigaAuda
1.96Average goals (2nd half)1.32
RigaAuda
67%Clean sheet after half-time61%
RigaAuda
22%No goal after half-time39%
RigaAuda

Riga - second-half results

59% W30% R11% P
58
Half-time points
41
Half-time goals
+27
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+27
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 74%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Auda - second-half results

39% W43% R18% P
46
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match1.22.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match2.02.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
15
5
16-30
18
4
31-45
11
6
46-60
10
4
61-75
19
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +16 - wins late phases.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
7
5
16-30
11
6
31-45
9
5
46-60
7
3
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
85%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.94
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.97
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
179%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

RigaLigaAuda
Average goals in match 4.002.97 2.57
Both teams scored 59%55% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 85%56% 46%
Clean sheets 41%24% 43%
Goal before half-time 89%75% 75%
Goal after half-time 81%83% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Riga 6 - 1 - 0 Auda. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 71% matches.

Auda
0 : 2
Riga
Riga
4 : 1
Auda
Auda
1 : 2
Riga
Riga FC
6 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
1 : 3
Riga FC
FK Auda Riga
1 : 3
Riga FC
Riga FC
2 : 2
FK Auda Riga

FAQ

When do Riga and Auda play?

Riga face Auda on 11 September 2026 in Virsliga at Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Auda?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Riga won 6, Auda won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 71% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Auda?

Riga score 3.00 goals per game on average and Auda 1.61. The Virsliga average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Riga's matches and 50% of Auda's.

What form are Riga and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games Riga have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Auda 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Auda?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.