Latvia - VirsligaSporta komplekss ĶeizarmežsData current as of 23 October 2026

Riga vs Auda: match statistics

Riga crest
Riga
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Auda crest
Auda

Riga vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga played Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 11 September 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Riga: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Auda: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga scores 2.93 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Auda scores 1.61 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga 61%, Auda 50%. Over 2.5: Riga 82%, Auda 46%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Riga has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.67. Riga: 17.1 shots per match, Auda: 14.0.

Match halves

Riga: half-time lead 64%, second-half goals 1.46. Auda: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Riga: 76-90+ (19 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 6-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 71%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Riga are clearly stronger at home: they have won 86% of their home matches, suffered no defeats there, and average 3.07 goals per game. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, posting an xG of 2.13 compared with Auda’s 1.61, while averaging 18.5 shots and 6.21 shots on target per match. However, Auda arrive on a strong five-match unbeaten run, with 3 wins and 2 draws, having conceded just 3 goals. The visitors’ away defence is solid, conceding an average of 0.92 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 46% of matches, but Riga possess greater attacking potential and average 65% possession at home. Riga’s recent form has been less consistent, as they have scored 10 goals but conceded 9 across their last five appearances; nevertheless, home advantage and their season-long efficiency point towards a Riga victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS figures are moderate: Riga records BTTS in 47% of matches, while Auda does so in 54%, against a league average of 55%. Both defenses regularly keep clean sheets—40% of Riga’s matches and as many as 46% of Auda’s—which clearly supports a scenario in which at least one side fails to score. Auda is also in excellent defensive form, conceding just 3 goals in its last 5 matches, an average of 0.6 per game, while its average xG conceded stands at only 0.56. Riga has recently averaged 2.0 goals scored, but its opponent has the potential to contain the hosts, while Auda may face a team that concedes only 1.0 goal per match over the season. Although both teams generate approximately 1.72 and 1.61 xG respectively, the more stable defensive data and Auda’s low percentage of matches without scoring—only 8%—give a slight edge to the BTTS - No pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Riga averages 1.8 goals per match, but Auda concede only 0.92, and in their last five games they have allowed opponents just 0.6 goals. However, both teams create enough chances, with average xG of 1.72 for Riga and 1.61 for Auda, supporting a forecast of around 2.60 goals. The 2.5-goal line is finely balanced: 53% of Riga’s matches finished Over 2.5, compared with only 38% of Auda’s. The strongest signal is Under 3.5, which occurred in 80% of Riga’s matches and 85% of Auda’s, with just 20% and 15% of games respectively producing at least four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Riga led at half-time in 8 of 15 matches, or 53% of games, whereas Auda did so in just 4 of 13, equivalent to 31%. The hosts score an average of 0.87 goals before the break, compared with Auda’s 0.62, while the Riga side also records more shots on target over the full match: 4.87 versus 4.46. Riga has greater attacking potential as measured by xG, 1.72 compared with 1.61, as well as better shot conversion, at 13% versus the opponents’ 10%. However, Auda are difficult to beat, conceding an average of just 0.92 goals and only 0.6 goals per match across their last five games, so draw or turnaround scenarios remain relevant. Despite Auda’s strong current form, Riga’s advantage in the first halves and home advantage provide the strongest support for the HT/FT 1/1 outcome, with the hosts leading at the break and winning the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
RigaAuda
12Shots12
RigaAuda
4Shots on target3
RigaAuda
1.35xG1.33
RigaAuda
5Corners3
RigaAuda
44Dangerous attacks50
RigaAuda
16Fouls14
RigaAuda
1Cards2
RigaAuda

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.93Goals scored / match1.61
RigaAuda
1Goals conceded / match0.96
RigaAuda
64%Average possession61%
RigaAuda
6.5Shots on target / match4.68
RigaAuda

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.11Shots per match13.96
RigaAuda
6.5Shots on target4.68
RigaAuda
17.1%Shot conversion11.5%
RigaAuda
64%Possession61%
RigaAuda
2.03xG for1.67
RigaAuda
0.96xG against1.08
RigaAuda

Shooting quality

Riga: DominantAuda: Balanced
RigaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)38%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 63% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Riga · 2.6 pts / match - Auda

Riga
WWDLD
Season result split
71% W21% D7% L
Season (W-D-L)
20-6-2
2.36 pts / match · goal difference +54
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-3-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Auda
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
61% W18% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-5-6
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 0.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 82% better for: goals scored per match.

2.93 goals / match - Riga · 1.61 goals / match - Auda

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 96% of matches (27 of 28 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 89% of matches (25 of 28 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 matches).

82Goals scored (season)45
RigaAuda
28Goals conceded (season)27
RigaAuda
3.93Average goals in match2.57
RigaAuda
14Goals scored (last 5)7
RigaAuda
8Goals conceded (last 5)1
RigaAuda

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal89%
RigaAuda
86%2 goals43%
RigaAuda
64%3 goals14%
RigaAuda
32%4 goals4%
RigaAuda

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal57%
RigaAuda
25%2 goals25%
RigaAuda
14%3 goals11%
RigaAuda
0%4 goals4%
RigaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time21%
RigaAuda
11%BTTS in both halves0%
RigaAuda
57%Scored in both halves32%
RigaAuda

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
RigaAuda
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
RigaAuda
80%BTTS - last 520%
RigaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
RigaAuda
64%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
RigaAuda
36%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
RigaAuda

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
RigaAuda
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
RigaAuda
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
RigaAuda

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.11 pts / match - Riga · 1.64 pts / match - Auda

Riga - half-time state
64% leading18% draw18% trailing
Auda - half-time state
43% leading36% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.11Points per match (1st half)1.64
RigaAuda
1.46Goals scored (1st half)0.75
RigaAuda
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
RigaAuda
1.96Average goals (1st half)1.25
RigaAuda
61%Clean sheet before half-time64%
RigaAuda
25%No goal before half-time39%
RigaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

2.04Points per match (2nd half)1.61
RigaAuda
1.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
RigaAuda
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
RigaAuda
1.96Average goals (2nd half)1.32
RigaAuda
64%Clean sheet after half-time61%
RigaAuda
21%No goal after half-time39%
RigaAuda

Riga - second-half results

57% W32% D11% L
59
Half-time points
41
Half-time goals
+27
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
+27
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 64% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Auda - second-half results

39% W43% D18% L
46
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match1.21.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.82.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
15
5
16-30
18
4
31-45
11
7
46-60
11
4
61-75
19
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +16 - wins late phases.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
7
5
16-30
11
6
31-45
9
5
46-60
7
3
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
85%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.90
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
177%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

RigaLigaAuda
Average goals in match▲ 3.932.94▼ 2.57
Both teams scored▲ 61%55%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 82%55%▼ 46%
Clean sheets▲ 39%25%▲ 43%
Goal before half-time▲ 86%74%• 75%
Goal after half-time• 82%83%▼ 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AudaYellow cardYouba Traore
  2. AudaYellow cardRalfs Kragliks
  3. RigaYellow cardAndrés Salazar Osorio

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Riga 6 - 1 - 0 Auda. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 71% matches.

Auda
0 : 2
Riga
Riga
4 : 1
Auda
Auda
1 : 2
Riga
Riga FC
6 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
1 : 3
Riga FC
FK Auda Riga
1 : 3
Riga FC
Riga FC
2 : 2
FK Auda Riga

FAQ

What was the result of Riga vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished Riga 2:2 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Auda?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Riga won 6, Auda won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 71% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Auda?

Riga score 2.93 goals per game on average and Auda 1.61. The Virsliga average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Riga's matches and 50% of Auda's.

What form are Riga and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games Riga have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Auda 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Auda?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.