Latvia - VirsligaRTU stadionsData current as of 04 November 2026

Rīgas FS vs Super Nova: match statistics

Rīgas FS crest
Rīgas FS
4 : 0half-time 3:0
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

Rīgas FS vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rīgas FS played Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 15 October 2026. Venue: RTU stadions. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Rīgas FS: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Super Nova: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rīgas FS scores 2.42 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.00 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.87 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rīgas FS 48%, Super Nova 55%. Over 2.5: Rīgas FS 58%, Super Nova 48%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Rīgas FS has higher xG: 1.98 vs 1.25. Rīgas FS: 16.4 shots per match, Super Nova: 10.0.

Match halves

Rīgas FS: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.39. Super Nova: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Rīgas FS: 76-90+ (17 goals). Super Nova: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.87 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 6-0-0. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 83%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rīgas FS is the clear favorite in this fixture: at home they average 3.00 goals per game (56 goals this season) and register a higher xG — 1.88 versus Super Nova’s 1.20, indicating superior chance quality. The hosts average 15.64 shots per game with 5.82 on target, while the visitors manage only 8.92 shots and 3.5 on target; shot conversion is 19% vs 11%, so Rīgas converts chances more frequently. Defensively Rīgas concedes 0.73 goals per home game and have allowed just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, whereas Super Nova concedes 1.08 on the road and have shipped 9 goals in their last five fixtures, highlighting defensive issues for the visitors. Additionally, the hosts have won all of their last 5 matches (10 goals scored) compared to the visitors’ record of 3 wins and 2 losses (8 goals), and the percentage of matches without a goal is 9% for Rīgas and 33% for Super Nova, which increases the probability of a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Signals are mixed: seasonally Rīgas FS has BTTS at 82% and Super Nova 42%, with the league average at 55%, which on the season favors BTTS. However, in the last 5 matches the picture is reversed — the home side has BTTS only 20% while the visitors 80%; Rīgas FS in this period scored 10 and conceded 1 (avg 2.0 scored and 0.2 conceded) with recent xG 2.36 vs xG against 0.88. Super Nova in their last five games scored 8 and conceded 9 (1.6-1.8) with recent xG_for 1.63 and xG_against 1.69, meaning they can create chances but are defensively vulnerable. Considering that the hosts’ recent form is 5 wins with a 10-1 record and a significant suppression of the opponent’s chances (xG against 0.88 vs 1.63 xG created by the visitors), the stronger and more recent signal appears to be No BTTS; I propose 65% for "no" and 35% for "yes".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Rīgas FS in the last 5 matches scores on average 2.0 goals and concedes 0.2, with xG 2.36 in attack and 0.88 in defense; Super Nova in the last 5 averages 1.6 scored and 1.8 conceded, with xG 1.63 (attack) and 1.69 (defense). Combining one team’s attack with the other’s defense ((2.36+1.69)/2 and (1.63+0.88)/2) yields a projection of about 2.03 goals for Rīgas FS and 1.25 for Super Nova, totalling ~3.28 goals. Seasonal stats confirm a tendency for goals: Rīgas FS has 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, home teams have 64% of matches over 2.5, and the league averages 2.95 goals per match. Given these figures, Over 1.5 is the strongest signal (high confidence), Over 2.5 has a moderate edge given the expected 3.28 goals, while Over 3.5 is less justified (seasonally 27% for hosts and 0% for visitors). Therefore I recommend betting on Over 1.5 as the best line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and an away win at full-time (X/2). Both teams have similar xG: hosts 1.17 vs visitors 1.20, however the hosts concede on average 1.89 goals per match compared to 1.48 for the visitors, giving the away side a defensive advantage. Season-long metrics show the visitors have won 50% of matches and accumulate 1.58 points per game, while the hosts have only an 18% win rate and 0.73 points per game, so I expect Super Nova to take the initiative after the break. A draw at the break is also the most common half-time outcome — hosts were level at the interval in 45% of matches and the visitors in 58% — and the average first-half goals are low: 0.64 (home) vs 0.5 (away), which favors a low-scoring first half. Although the hosts led at half-time in 100% of their last five matches, the visitors’ superior efficiency and better defense (seasonal goals conceded: 2.0 hosts vs 1.08 visitors) lead me to forecast an X/2 HT/FT.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
15Shots9
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
8Shots on target2
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.88xG0.97
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
9Corners3
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
54Dangerous attacks37
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
8Fouls7
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1Cards1
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Rīgas FSSuper Nova
2.42Goals scored / match1
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.77Goals conceded / match1.32
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
60%Average possession46%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
6.1Shots on target / match3.74
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.35Shots per match9.97
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
6.1Shots on target3.74
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
14.8%Shot conversion10%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
60%Possession46%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.98xG for1.25
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.95xG against1.68
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Shooting quality

Rīgas FS: DominantSuper Nova: Balanced
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)37%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rīgas FS is 22% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Rīgas FS · 1.8 pts / match - Super Nova

Rīgas FS
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
77% W16% D6% L
Season (W-D-L)
24-5-2
2.48 pts / match · goal difference +51
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.03Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Super Nova
WWLLW
Season result split
35% W16% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-15
1.23 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS is 142% better for: goals scored per match.

2.42 goals / match - Rīgas FS · 1 goals / match - Super Nova

Rīgas FS is 71% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.77 goals / match - Rīgas FS · 1.32 goals / match - Super Nova

Rīgas FS scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS scores in 94% of matches (29 of 31 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 26% (8 of 31 matches).

Super Nova scoring profile: strong

Super Nova scores in 74% of matches (23 of 31 matches), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 48% (15 of 31 matches).

75Goals scored (season)31
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
24Goals conceded (season)41
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
3.19Average goals in match2.32
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
10Goals scored (last 5)4
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal74%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
65%2 goals23%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
45%3 goals3%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
23%4 goals0%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal74%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
16%2 goals39%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
10%3 goals10%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0%4 goals6%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time26%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
45%Scored in both halves10%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
60%BTTS - last 520%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.84 pts / match - Rīgas FS · 1.03 pts / match - Super Nova

Rīgas FS - half-time state
52% leading29% draw19% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
16% leading55% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.84Points per match (1st half)1.03
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.03Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.45Average goals (1st half)1.19
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
68%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
35%No goal before half-time61%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

2.13Points per match (2nd half)1.35
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
0.35Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.13
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
71%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova
26%No goal after half-time55%
Rīgas FSSuper Nova

Rīgas FS - second-half results

58% W39% D3% L
57
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
66
Second-half points
+32
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - second-half results

39% W19% D42% L
32
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding219%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rīgas FS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.20
Goals scored / match0.41.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+7
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rīgas FS
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
12
6
16-30
12
5
31-45
12
4
46-60
14
3
61-75
17
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
5
7
16-30
6
13
31-45
5
7
46-60
1
3
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rīgas FS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
151%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Rīgas FSLigaSuper Nova
Average goals in match▲ 3.192.87▼ 2.32
Both teams scored▼ 48%55%• 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 58%53%▼ 48%
Clean sheets▲ 48%25%• 26%
Goal before half-time▲ 81%74%▼ 58%
Goal after half-time▼ 74%81%▲ 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.87
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Roberts SavaļnieksOff: Dmitrijs Zelenkovs
  2. Super NovaYellow cardRaivis Ķiršs
  3. Rīgas FSGoalJānis IkaunieksAssist: Darko Lemajić
  4. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Shina KumaterOff: Herdi Prenga
  5. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Mārtiņš ĶigursOff: Lasha Odisharia
  6. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Aram BaghdasaryanOff: Ralfs Šitjakovs
  7. Rīgas FSYellow cardShina Kumater
  8. Rīgas FSGoalDuje Korač

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Rīgas FS 6 - 0 - 0 Super Nova. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 83% matches.

Super Nova
1 : 2
Rīgas FS
Rīgas FS
2 : 0
Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 3
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
4 : 1
SK Super Nova
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
2 : 1
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 2
FK Rīgas Futbola skola

FAQ

What was the result of Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 4:0 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and Super Nova?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 6, Super Nova won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?

Rīgas FS score 2.42 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.00. The Virsliga average is 2.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Rīgas FS's matches and 55% of Super Nova's.

What form are Rīgas FS and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Super Nova 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?

The statistical background for Rīgas FS vs Super Nova — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.